CVE-2016-15037
Executive Summary
CVE-2016-15037 is a problematic cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability found in the go4rayyan Scumblr application up to version 2.0.1a. The vulnerability resides in the Task Handler component, allowing an attacker to inject malicious scripts via remote manipulation. With a CVSS score of 2.4, the risk is low due to the requirement for user interaction, but the lack of a public patch status and the potential for exploitation in internal networks warrants attention. The vendor recommends upgrading to version 2.0.2, which includes a patch identified by commit 5c9120f2362ddb7cbe48f2c4620715adddc4ee35. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code is available at this time.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
Supply Chain & Package Security
This vulnerability affects the Scumblr application, which is a Ruby-based tool. While not a direct package manager issue (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby), the application may be distributed via GitHub or other repositories. Organizations using Scumblr should verify their version and apply the patch immediately to prevent supply chain risks from unpatched dependencies.
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
- CVSS Score: 2.4 (Low)
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack Vector: Network (AV:N)
- Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L)
- Privileges Required: None (PR:N)
- User Interaction: Required (UI:R)
- Scope: Changed (S:C)
- Confidentiality Impact: Low (C:L)
- Integrity Impact: None (I:N)
- Availability Impact: None (A:N)
Threat Level: Low. Exploitation requires user interaction (e.g., clicking a crafted link), and the impact is limited to low confidentiality loss. However, in a context where Scumblr is used internally for sensitive data, the risk may be elevated.
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The vulnerability is a classic stored or reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) issue in the Task Handler component of Scumblr. The component fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before rendering it in the browser. An attacker can craft a malicious payload (e.g., JavaScript code) that, when processed by the Task Handler, executes in the context of the victim's session.
Attack Flow:
- The attacker identifies a parameter in the Task Handler that is not sanitized.
- The attacker crafts a URL or input containing a malicious script (e.g.,
<script>alert('XSS')</script>). - The victim (e.g., a Scumblr user) interacts with the crafted input (e.g., clicks a link or views a task).
- The script executes, potentially stealing session cookies, redirecting the user, or performing actions on their behalf.
Root Cause: Lack of output encoding or input validation in the Task Handler component. The patch (commit 5c9120f2362ddb7cbe48f2c4620715adddc4ee35) likely introduces proper sanitization or escaping.
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
Vulnerable Code (Scumblr <= 2.0.1a):
# Example vulnerable handler (pseudo-code)
def task_handler
task_name = params[:task_name]
render html: "<div>Task: #{task_name}</div>"
end
Patched Code (Scumblr >= 2.0.2):
# Example patched handler (pseudo-code)
def task_handler
task_name = params[:task_name]
sanitized_name = ERB::Util.html_escape(task_name)
render html: "<div>Task: #{sanitized_name}</div>"
end
The patch introduces HTML escaping to neutralize script injection.
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team
Since no public exploit code is available, a manual test can be performed:
- Setup: Deploy Scumblr 2.0.1a in a lab environment (e.g., using Docker or a local Ruby setup).
- Craft Payload: Use a simple XSS payload:
<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>. - Inject: Submit the payload via a vulnerable parameter in the Task Handler (e.g., via a POST request or URL parameter).
- Trigger: Have a victim user view the affected task or page.
- Observe: The script executes, demonstrating the vulnerability.
Example cURL command:
curl -X POST http://target:3000/task_handler -d "task_name=<script>alert('XSS')</script>"
Blue Team
- Monitor: Look for unusual script tags in HTTP requests or responses, especially in the Task Handler endpoint.
- Harden: Apply the patch immediately. If patching is not possible, implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) rule to block common XSS patterns.
- Educate: Train users to avoid clicking suspicious links or interacting with untrusted input.
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
- Network: HTTP requests containing
<script>tags or encoded variants (e.g.,%3Cscript%3E) targeting the Task Handler endpoint. - Logs: Server logs showing unusual parameters in the Task Handler (e.g.,
task_name=<script>...). - File: Modified or injected JavaScript files in the Scumblr installation directory.
Example IOC:
GET /task_handler?task_name=%3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C/script%3E HTTP/1.1
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2016_15037_XSS_Scumblr {
meta:
description = "Detects XSS attempts targeting Scumblr Task Handler"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2025-04-10"
reference = "CVE-2016-15037"
strings:
$xss1 = "<script>" ascii wide nocase
$xss2 = "onerror=" ascii wide nocase
$xss3 = "javascript:" ascii wide nocase
$param = "task_name" ascii wide nocase
condition:
any of ($xss*) and $param
}
Sigma Rule
title: CVE-2016-15037 XSS Attempt on Scumblr Task Handler
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects XSS payloads in HTTP requests to Scumblr Task Handler
author: Valters IT
logsource:
category: webserver
product: apache
detection:
selection:
cs-method: 'GET'
cs-uri-query|contains: 'task_name='
cs-uri-query|contains|all:
- '<script>'
- 'onerror='
- 'javascript:'
condition: selection
falsepositives:
- Legitimate use of script tags in task names (unlikely)
level: medium
Suricata Rule
alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2016-15037 XSS Attempt on Scumblr Task Handler"; flow:to_server; content:"task_name="; http_uri; content:"<script>"; http_uri; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
Remediation & Mitigation
- Immediate: Upgrade Scumblr to version 2.0.2 or apply the patch from commit
5c9120f2362ddb7cbe48f2c4620715adddc4ee35. - Workaround: If patching is delayed, implement a WAF rule to block XSS patterns in the Task Handler endpoint.
- Long-term: Conduct a code review of all input handling components to ensure proper sanitization and output encoding.
- Monitoring: Enable logging and alerting for suspicious HTTP requests containing script tags.
Valters IT - DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence Expert