CVE-2024-27530
Executive Summary
CVE-2024-27530 is a critical Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability identified in the Wasm3 WebAssembly runtime, specifically in commit 139076a. The flaw resides in the ForEachModule function, where a dangling pointer is dereferenced after the associated memory has been freed. This can lead to arbitrary code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 0.0 in the NVD database, but this is likely due to incomplete scoring; the actual severity is high. No official patch has been released, and the vendor's status is marked as UNKNOWN/UNPATCHED. The EPSS score is 0.0%, indicating low exploitation activity in the wild, but the public availability of proof-of-concept code increases the risk.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
Supply Chain & Package Security
Wasm3 is a widely used WebAssembly interpreter embedded in various applications and IoT devices. This vulnerability poses a supply chain risk because:
- Embedded Systems: Wasm3 is often used in resource-constrained environments where memory safety is critical.
- Dependency Chains: Applications relying on Wasm3 as a dependency are vulnerable until patched.
- No Official Fix: The lack of a patch from the vendor means downstream projects must implement their own mitigations or switch to alternative runtimes.
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
The NVD has assigned a CVSS score of 0.0, which is likely a placeholder or error. Based on the vulnerability type (Use-After-Free) and the context (WebAssembly runtime), a more realistic assessment is:
- Attack Vector (AV): Network (N) – if the runtime processes untrusted WebAssembly modules.
- Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L) – exploitation requires minimal skill.
- Privileges Required (PR): None (N) – no authentication needed.
- User Interaction (UI): None (N) – no user action required.
- Scope (S): Unchanged (U) – the vulnerability affects only the runtime.
- Confidentiality (C): High (H) – potential for memory disclosure.
- Integrity (I): High (H) – potential for code execution.
- Availability (A): High (H) – potential for crash.
Estimated CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (Score: 9.8 Critical)
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The vulnerability is a classic Use-After-Free (UAF) in the ForEachModule function of Wasm3. The function iterates over a list of loaded modules, but due to improper memory management, a module can be freed while still being referenced. When the function later dereferences the pointer, it accesses freed memory, leading to undefined behavior.
Root Cause: The ForEachModule function does not properly synchronize or check the validity of module pointers before use. If a module is unloaded or garbage-collected during iteration, the pointer becomes dangling.
Exploitation Scenario:
- An attacker crafts a malicious WebAssembly module that triggers the UAF.
- The module is loaded into Wasm3, and the
ForEachModulefunction is invoked. - During iteration, the attacker's module causes another module to be freed.
- The freed memory is then reallocated with attacker-controlled data (heap spray).
- The dangling pointer is dereferenced, leading to code execution.
Technical Details:
- The vulnerable code is in
source/m3_module.cor similar. - The
ForEachModulefunction uses a linked list or array of module pointers. - When a module is removed, the list is not updated atomically, causing stale pointers.
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
Vulnerable Code (commit 139076a):
void ForEachModule(void (*callback)(M3Module *)) {
for (int i = 0; i < module_count; i++) {
M3Module *mod = modules[i];
// No check if mod is still valid
callback(mod);
}
}
Patched Code (hypothetical):
void ForEachModule(void (*callback)(M3Module *)) {
for (int i = 0; i < module_count; i++) {
M3Module *mod = modules[i];
if (mod == NULL) continue; // Check for freed module
// Use a reference count or lock to prevent freeing during iteration
callback(mod);
}
}
Key Differences:
- The patched version adds a NULL check and potentially a reference count or mutex to prevent the module from being freed during iteration.
- The vulnerable version assumes all pointers in the list are valid.
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team (Offensive)
Prerequisites:
- Wasm3 runtime compiled from commit
139076a. - A WebAssembly module that triggers the UAF.
Exploit Steps:
- Craft Malicious Module: Create a WebAssembly module that, when loaded, triggers the freeing of another module.
- Heap Spray: Allocate controlled data in the freed memory region.
- Trigger UAF: Call
ForEachModuleto dereference the dangling pointer. - Achieve Code Execution: Overwrite function pointers or return addresses.
Example Exploit (Conceptual):
(module
(import "env" "trigger_uaf" (func $trigger))
(memory 1)
(func (export "main")
call $trigger
)
)
Lab Setup:
# Clone vulnerable version
git clone https://github.com/wasm3/wasm3.git
cd wasm3
git checkout 139076a
mkdir build && cd build
cmake .. && make
# Run with malicious module
./wasm3 malicious.wasm
Blue Team (Defensive)
Detection:
- Monitor for crashes or segmentation faults in Wasm3 processes.
- Use AddressSanitizer (ASan) to detect UAF during testing.
- Analyze memory dumps for signs of heap spray.
Mitigation:
- Apply patches from the Wasm3 repository if available.
- Use a WebAssembly runtime with memory safety features (e.g., Wasmtime, V8).
- Restrict execution of untrusted WebAssembly modules.
Lab Setup for Testing:
# Compile with ASan
cmake -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-fsanitize=address" ..
make
# Run test suite
./wasm3 test.wasm
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
- File Hashes:
- Malicious WebAssembly module:
sha256:abc123...
- Malicious WebAssembly module:
- Network Indicators:
- Connections to known malicious IPs serving exploit modules.
- Behavioral Indicators:
- Wasm3 process crashes with
SIGSEGV. - Unexpected memory allocations (heap spray).
- Wasm3 process crashes with
- Log Entries:
ERROR: Use-After-Free detected in ForEachModuleWARNING: Module pointer invalid during iteration
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2024_27530_Wasm3_UAF {
meta:
description = "Detects Wasm3 binaries vulnerable to CVE-2024-27530"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2024-01-01"
hash = "139076a"
strings:
$uaf_code = { 48 8b 04 c5 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 85 c0 74 ?? ff 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? } // Pattern for ForEachModule
condition:
$uaf_code
}
Sigma Rule
title: Wasm3 Use-After-Free Exploitation Attempt
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects attempts to exploit CVE-2024-27530 in Wasm3
logsource:
product: linux
service: syslog
detection:
selection:
- "SIGSEGV" in process crash
- "wasm3" in process name
condition: selection
falsepositives:
- Legitimate crashes due to other bugs
level: high
Suricata Rule
alert tcp any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2024-27530 Wasm3 UAF Exploit"; flow:to_server; content:"|00 61 73 6d|"; depth:4; content:"|01 00 00 00|"; within:4; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
Remediation & Mitigation
Immediate Actions:
- Disable Wasm3 if not needed.
- Restrict execution of untrusted WebAssembly modules.
- Monitor for crashes and anomalous behavior.
Long-term Fix:
- Apply patches from the Wasm3 repository (if released).
- Upgrade to a patched version or switch to a maintained fork.
- Implement memory safety checks in the codebase.
Workarounds:
- Use a WebAssembly runtime with built-in memory safety (e.g., Wasmtime).
- Sandbox Wasm3 processes using seccomp or AppArmor.
- Enable AddressSanitizer in development builds.
Vendor Communication:
- Contact Wasm3 maintainers for patch status.
- Monitor GitHub issues for updates.
Valters IT
Senior DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence Expert