☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]

CVE-2024-37571

CVE-2024-37571 Buffer Overflow in Sas
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-06-26 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-23 20:35 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.36%
👁️
0.36% probability
9.0× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
VULNERABLE: UNKNOWN / CHECK VENDOR
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
4.3
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2024-37571 identifies a critical buffer overflow vulnerability in SAS Broker version 9.2 build 1495. The flaw resides in the handling of the _debug parameter, which can be exploited by sending a crafted payload. Successful exploitation could lead to a denial of service (DoS) or the leakage of sensitive information. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 0.0 (likely unassigned or placeholder), but the underlying CWE-120 (Buffer Overflow) indicates a serious memory corruption issue. No public exploit code or proof-of-concept is currently available, and no patch has been released by the vendor. The EPSS score is 0.0%, suggesting low active exploitation in the wild, but the risk remains high due to the potential for information disclosure and service disruption.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 0.0 (Unassigned/Placeholder)
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (likely, based on parameter injection)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (crafted payload)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None
  • User Interaction (UI): None
  • Scope (S): Unchanged
  • Confidentiality (C): High (information disclosure)
  • Integrity (I): None (DoS focus)
  • Availability (A): High (denial of service)

Threat Level: High. Although the CVSS score is 0.0, the nature of a buffer overflow in a network-facing service (SAS Broker) with potential for both DoS and information leakage elevates the risk. The lack of a patch and public exploit increases the urgency for defensive measures.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability is a classic stack-based buffer overflow in SAS Broker 9.2 build 1495. The _debug parameter is likely used for diagnostic purposes and is processed without proper bounds checking. An attacker can send a specially crafted HTTP request (or other protocol) to the SAS Broker service, where the _debug parameter value exceeds the allocated buffer size. This overwrites adjacent memory regions, including the return address on the stack.

Mechanism:

  1. The SAS Broker receives a request with a _debug parameter.
  2. The application copies the parameter value into a fixed-size stack buffer without validating its length.
  3. If the input exceeds the buffer size, it overwrites the stack frame, including the saved return address.
  4. When the function returns, execution jumps to an attacker-controlled address, leading to arbitrary code execution or a crash (DoS).
  5. Even without code execution, the overflow can corrupt memory, potentially leaking sensitive data from adjacent memory regions.

Attack Vector: Network-based, likely via HTTP or a proprietary protocol. The attacker does not need authentication.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Vulnerable Code (Conceptual):

void handle_debug(char *input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strcpy(buffer, input); // No bounds checking
    // Process debug info
}

Patched Code (Conceptual):

void handle_debug(char *input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strncpy(buffer, input, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0';
    // Process debug info
}

Explanation: The vulnerable code uses strcpy, which does not check the length of the source string. The patched version uses strncpy with a size limit and ensures null-termination. Since no official patch is available, this is a hypothetical fix.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Prerequisites:

  • SAS Broker 9.2 build 1495 running on a target system.
  • Network access to the service (e.g., port 80 or custom port).

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Reconnaissance: Identify the SAS Broker service and confirm the version.
  2. Craft Payload: Create a payload that overflows the _debug parameter buffer. For a DoS, a long string of 'A's may suffice. For information disclosure, include a pattern to read memory.
  3. Send Request: Use a tool like curl or a custom script to send the malicious request.

Example Payload (DoS):

curl -X GET "http://target:port/?_debug=$(python3 -c 'print("A"*1000)')"

Example Payload (Information Leak):

import socket

payload = b"_debug=" + b"A"*256 + b"%x%x%x%x"  # Format string to leak stack data
s = socket.socket()
s.connect(("target", port))
s.send(b"GET /?" + payload + b" HTTP/1.1\r\n\r\n")
print(s.recv(4096))
s.close()

Note: No public exploit exists; these are conceptual examples.

Blue Team

Detection & Response:

  • Monitor for unusually long _debug parameter values in logs.
  • Deploy WAF rules to block requests with _debug parameters exceeding a reasonable length (e.g., > 256 bytes).
  • Use network segmentation to limit exposure of SAS Broker services.
  • Enable stack canaries and ASLR on the host OS to mitigate exploitation.

Honeypot Setup:

  • Deploy a decoy SAS Broker instance to capture attacker payloads and analyze them.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network IOCs:

    • HTTP requests with _debug parameter values longer than 256 bytes.
    • Repeated connection attempts to SAS Broker port from unknown IPs.
    • Anomalous patterns in request bodies (e.g., long strings of 'A's or hex dumps).
  • Host IOCs:

    • SAS Broker process crashes (core dumps).
    • Unexpected memory access violations in application logs.
    • Presence of unusual files in the SAS Broker installation directory.
  • Log IOCs:

    • Log entries showing _debug parameter with excessive length.
    • Error messages related to buffer overflow or segmentation faults.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2024_37571_SAS_Broker_BufferOverflow {
    meta:
        description = "Detects SAS Broker buffer overflow attempts via _debug parameter"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        cve = "CVE-2024-37571"
    strings:
        $debug_param = "_debug="
        $long_string = /_debug=[A-Za-z0-9]{257,}/
    condition:
        $debug_param and $long_string
}

Sigma Rule

title: SAS Broker Buffer Overflow Attempt via _debug Parameter
id: 8a9b3c4d-5e6f-7a8b-9c0d-1e2f3a4b5c6d
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP requests with excessively long _debug parameter values targeting SAS Broker
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: apache
detection:
    selection:
        cs-uri-query|contains: "_debug="
        cs-uri-query|length: >= 257
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate debugging with long parameters (unlikely)
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2024-37571 SAS Broker Buffer Overflow Attempt"; flow:to_server; content:"_debug="; http_uri; pcre:"/_debug=[A-Za-z0-9]{257,}/"; classtype:attempted-dos; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Isolate SAS Broker 9.2 build 1495 from untrusted networks.
  2. Apply input validation at the network perimeter (WAF/IPS) to block oversized _debug parameters.
  3. Monitor logs for exploitation attempts.

Long-term Fix:

  • Vendor Patch: Await an official patch from SAS. Contact SAS support for updates.
  • Upgrade: If possible, upgrade to a newer, patched version of SAS Broker.
  • Code Hardening: If source code is available, implement bounds checking (e.g., strncpy instead of strcpy).

Workaround:

  • Disable the _debug parameter functionality if not needed, by modifying configuration files or using a reverse proxy to strip the parameter.

Valters IT

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2024-37571/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.