☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N 🐛 CWE-200
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2024-4220

CVE-2024-4220 Information Disclosure in Beyondtrust
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-06-04 20:13 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-13 10:06 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.15%
👁️
0.15% probability
3.7× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1589
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 4.3
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: L Confidentiality Low
I: N Integrity None
A: N Availability None
4.3
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2024-4220 is an information disclosure vulnerability in BeyondTrust BeyondInsight, a privileged access management (PAM) solution. The flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to enumerate valid usernames by exploiting a weakness in the application's response handling. This enumeration can serve as a precursor to targeted brute-force or credential-stuffing attacks. The vulnerability affects all versions prior to 23.1. The CVSS score is 4.3 (Medium), and no public proof-of-concept (PoC) or exploit code has been released. The EPSS score is 0.0%, indicating a very low probability of exploitation in the wild at this time. The vendor has released a fix in version 23.1.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to an open-source package (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). It affects a proprietary enterprise software product, BeyondInsight. Supply chain risks are limited to the software's distribution and update mechanisms.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 4.3 (Medium)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N) – The vulnerability can be exploited remotely.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L) – No special conditions are required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N) – No authentication is needed.
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N) – No user action is required.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U) – The impact is confined to the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality (C): Low (L) – Limited information disclosure (usernames).
  • Integrity (I): None (N) – No data modification.
  • Availability (A): None (N) – No service disruption.

Threat Level: Medium. While the direct impact is limited to username enumeration, this information can be leveraged in subsequent attacks, increasing the overall risk.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in the authentication or user-facing API of BeyondInsight. The application fails to provide consistent responses for valid versus invalid usernames. An attacker can send crafted requests (e.g., to a login endpoint, password reset, or user lookup API) and observe differences in response time, HTTP status codes, or error messages. This discrepancy allows the attacker to build a list of valid usernames.

Root Cause: Improper handling of user enumeration attempts. The application should return identical responses for both valid and invalid usernames to prevent information leakage.

Attack Flow:

  1. Attacker identifies the BeyondInsight login or user enumeration endpoint.
  2. Attacker sends a series of requests with different usernames.
  3. Attacker analyzes responses (e.g., "User not found" vs. "Invalid password").
  4. Attacker compiles a list of valid usernames.
  5. Attacker uses the list for targeted brute-force or credential-stuffing attacks.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Vulnerable Code (Pre-23.1):

# Example of vulnerable logic
def check_user(username):
    user = database.get_user(username)
    if user:
        return "Invalid password"
    else:
        return "User not found"

Patched Code (23.1+):

# Example of patched logic
def check_user(username):
    user = database.get_user(username)
    # Always return the same generic message
    return "Invalid username or password"

The patched code returns a generic error message regardless of whether the username exists, eliminating the enumeration vector.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Offensive)

Lab Setup:

  • Target: A vulnerable instance of BeyondInsight (version < 23.1).
  • Attacker: Kali Linux with common tools (curl, Burp Suite, custom scripts).

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Identify the login endpoint (e.g., https://target/Login).
  2. Use a tool like Burp Suite or a custom Python script to send requests with different usernames.
  3. Analyze responses for differences.

Example Python Script:

import requests

target = "https://target/Login"
usernames = ["admin", "user1", "nonexistent", "root"]

for username in usernames:
    data = {"username": username, "password": "test"}
    response = requests.post(target, data=data)
    if "User not found" in response.text:
        print(f"Invalid: {username}")
    else:
        print(f"Valid: {username}")

Blue Team (Defensive)

Detection:

  • Monitor for multiple failed login attempts with different usernames from a single IP.
  • Look for patterns in HTTP responses (e.g., "User not found" vs. "Invalid password").
  • Use the detection rules provided below.

Mitigation:

  • Apply the vendor patch (upgrade to version 23.1 or later).
  • Implement rate limiting on authentication endpoints.
  • Use Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block enumeration attempts.
  • Enable logging and alerting for suspicious authentication behavior.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network:
    • Multiple HTTP POST requests to /Login or similar endpoints with varying usernames.
    • Responses containing "User not found" or similar distinct messages.
  • Logs:
    • Repeated authentication failures from a single IP address.
    • Log entries showing attempts with common usernames (admin, root, etc.).
  • System:
    • Unusual CPU or memory usage on the BeyondInsight server due to enumeration attempts.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2024_4220_Username_Enumeration {
    meta:
        description = "Detects BeyondInsight username enumeration attempts"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2024-08-01"
        reference = "CVE-2024-4220"
    strings:
        $s1 = "User not found" ascii wide nocase
        $s2 = "Invalid password" ascii wide nocase
    condition:
        any of ($s*) and #s1 > 5
}

Sigma Rule

title: BeyondInsight Username Enumeration Attempt
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects multiple requests with different usernames to BeyondInsight login
author: Valters IT
date: 2024-08-01
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: beyondtrust
detection:
    selection:
        cs-method: 'POST'
        cs-uri-stem: '/Login'
        sc-status: 200
    condition: selection | count(unique(cs-username)) > 5 by src_ip
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate user testing
level: medium

Suricata Rule

alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"CVE-2024-4220 BeyondInsight Username Enumeration"; flow:to_server,established; content:"POST"; http_method; content:"/Login"; http_uri; content:"username"; http_client_body; pcre:"/(User not found|Invalid password)/"; threshold: type both, track by_src, count 10, seconds 60; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Upgrade BeyondInsight to version 23.1 or later.
  2. If immediate patching is not possible, implement compensating controls:
    • Enable rate limiting on authentication endpoints.
    • Use a WAF to block enumeration patterns.
    • Monitor logs for suspicious activity.

Long-Term Measures:

  • Conduct regular security assessments of BeyondInsight.
  • Implement generic error messages for all authentication failures.
  • Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the impact of username enumeration.

Vendor Advisory:

  • BeyondTrust has released a fix in version 23.1. Apply the update as soon as possible.

Valters IT

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

BeyondInsight
BeyondTrust BeyondInsight
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2024-4220/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.