CVE-2024-42442
Executive Summary
CVE-2024-42442 is a critical memory buffer vulnerability in AMI AptioV BIOS firmware that allows an unauthenticated attacker to trigger an improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer over the network. Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary code execution outside of the intended System Management Mode (SMM), potentially compromising the entire platform at the firmware level. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.2 (High) and currently has no known public exploit, patch, or proof-of-concept. The EPSS score is 0.0%, indicating low exploitation likelihood in the wild, but the impact is severe due to the privileged execution context.
This vulnerability is not related to any WordPress plugin or component; it is a firmware-level issue in AMI AptioV BIOS.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
Supply Chain & Package Security
This vulnerability is not in an NPM, PyPI, Go, or Ruby package. It affects firmware distributed by AMI to OEMs, making supply chain risk significant. Organizations must verify the integrity of BIOS updates from their hardware vendors and ensure they are sourced from trusted channels.
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
- CVSS Score: 7.2 (High)
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack Vector: Network (AV:N) – exploitable remotely without physical access.
- Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) – no special conditions required.
- Privileges Required: None (PR:N) – no authentication needed.
- User Interaction: None (UI:N) – no user action required.
- Scope: Unchanged (S:U) – vulnerability does not affect other components.
- Confidentiality Impact: High (C:H) – full memory read possible.
- Integrity Impact: High (I:H) – arbitrary code execution.
- Availability Impact: High (A:H) – potential denial of service or system compromise.
Threat Level: Critical due to the ability to execute code outside SMM, bypassing OS-level security controls.
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The vulnerability resides in the AMI AptioV BIOS firmware, specifically in the System Management Mode (SMM) handler. SMM is a highly privileged execution environment in x86/x64 processors, typically used for power management and hardware control. The flaw involves improper restriction of operations within a memory buffer when processing network packets. An attacker can send a specially crafted network packet to the vulnerable system, causing a buffer overflow or underflow in SMM code. This allows the attacker to overwrite critical SMM data structures or inject malicious code that executes with SMM privileges, effectively bypassing all OS-level security mechanisms (e.g., kernel protections, hypervisors).
The vulnerability is classified under CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer). The root cause is likely insufficient bounds checking on network input data before copying it into a fixed-size buffer in SMM memory.
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
Since no patch is available, a generic comparison is provided based on typical buffer overflow patterns.
Vulnerable Code (Conceptual):
void smm_network_handler(uint8_t *packet, uint32_t length) {
uint8_t buffer[256];
// No bounds check on length
memcpy(buffer, packet, length);
// Process buffer...
}
Patched Code (Conceptual):
void smm_network_handler(uint8_t *packet, uint32_t length) {
uint8_t buffer[256];
if (length > sizeof(buffer)) {
// Reject oversized packet
return;
}
memcpy(buffer, packet, length);
// Process buffer...
}
The patched version adds a length check before copying data, preventing buffer overflow.
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team (Offensive)
Prerequisites:
- A vulnerable system with AMI AptioV BIOS (version unknown).
- Network access to the target (local or remote).
- No authentication required.
Exploitation Steps:
- Reconnaissance: Identify systems with AMI AptioV BIOS via network scanning (e.g., using Shodan dorks: "AMI AptioV").
- Craft Payload: Create a network packet that triggers the buffer overflow. Since no public exploit exists, this requires reverse engineering the SMM handler. A typical approach:
- Send a packet larger than the expected buffer size.
- Overwrite SMM return addresses or function pointers with shellcode.
- Deliver Payload: Send the crafted packet to the target's network interface (e.g., via UDP or TCP depending on the vulnerable service).
- Execute: The overflow causes the SMM to execute attacker-controlled code, granting full control over the system.
Example (Conceptual Python script):
import socket
target_ip = "192.168.1.100"
port = 1234 # Example port
# Craft oversized packet
payload = b"A" * 512 # Overflow buffer
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
sock.sendto(payload, (target_ip, port))
sock.close()
Note: This is a conceptual example; actual exploitation requires precise knowledge of the vulnerable handler.
Blue Team (Defensive)
Detection:
- Monitor for anomalous network traffic to/from BIOS management interfaces (e.g., ports commonly used by AMI firmware).
- Use host-based intrusion detection to monitor SMM memory accesses (requires specialized tools like Intel VT-x or AMD SVM).
- Implement network segmentation to isolate systems with AMI AptioV BIOS.
Mitigation:
- Apply firmware updates from hardware vendors as soon as available.
- Disable unnecessary network services in BIOS settings.
- Use hardware security modules (HSMs) to protect SMM integrity.
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
- Network: Unusually large network packets directed to BIOS management ports (e.g., UDP/TCP ports 623, 664, or custom ports).
- Host: Unexpected SMM code execution logs (if available via platform firmware monitoring).
- Memory: Overwritten SMM data structures (detectable via forensic memory analysis).
- File System: No file-based IOCs as the attack is firmware-level.
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2024_42442_AMI_AptioV {
meta:
description = "Detects potential exploitation of CVE-2024-42442 in AMI AptioV BIOS"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2025-04-10"
reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42442"
strings:
$smm_handler = "SMM" ascii wide nocase
$overflow_pattern = { 41 41 41 41 } // 'AAAA' pattern
condition:
$smm_handler and #overflow_pattern > 10
}
Sigma Rule
title: CVE-2024-42442 AMI AptioV BIOS Buffer Overflow
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects network packets targeting AMI AptioV BIOS management interfaces with oversized payloads
author: Valters IT
date: 2025/04/10
logsource:
category: network_connection
product: windows
detection:
selection:
DestinationPort:
- 623
- 664
PayloadLength: > 256
condition: selection
falsepositives:
- Legitimate firmware updates
level: high
Suricata Rule
alert udp any any -> any 623 (msg:"CVE-2024-42442 AMI AptioV BIOS Buffer Overflow Attempt"; content:"|41 41 41 41|"; offset:0; depth:512; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
Remediation & Mitigation
- Vendor Patch: Await official firmware update from AMI or hardware OEM. Contact vendor support for status.
- Workaround: Disable network-based BIOS management features (e.g., AMT, IPMI) if not required.
- Network Segmentation: Isolate systems with AMI AptioV BIOS on separate VLANs with strict access controls.
- Monitoring: Deploy detection rules (YARA, Sigma, Suricata) to identify exploitation attempts.
- Hardening: Enable Secure Boot and firmware integrity checks (e.g., Intel Boot Guard) to prevent unauthorized code execution.
- Incident Response: If compromise is suspected, perform forensic analysis of firmware memory and reflash BIOS from a trusted source.
Valters IT
Securing Digital Frontiers
What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.
💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE
Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database.
Access poc_code via API Pro.