CVE-2024-45617
Executive Summary
CVE-2024-45617 is a vulnerability in the OpenSC suite, which includes OpenSC tools, PKCS#11 module, minidriver, and CTK. The flaw arises from insufficient or missing checks on return values of functions, leading to the use of uninitialized variables. An attacker can exploit this by presenting a crafted USB device or smart card that returns specially crafted responses to APDUs (Application Protocol Data Units). This can result in unexpected behavior, potentially leading to information disclosure, denial of service, or arbitrary code execution depending on the context. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 0.0, indicating incomplete scoring, but the underlying issue is serious due to the potential for memory corruption.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
Supply Chain & Package Security
OpenSC is a widely used open-source library for smart card communication. This vulnerability affects the supply chain of systems relying on smart card authentication, such as government IDs, banking, and enterprise access control. The lack of a patch increases risk for all downstream users.
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
- CVSS Score: 0.0 (Incomplete)
- Attack Vector (AV): Physical (requires crafted USB device or smart card)
- Attack Complexity (AC): Low
- Privileges Required (PR): None
- User Interaction (UI): Required (user must insert the device)
- Scope (S): Unchanged
- Confidentiality (C): High (potential memory leak)
- Integrity (I): High (potential memory corruption)
- Availability (A): High (potential crash)
- Threat Level: High (due to physical access and memory corruption potential)
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The vulnerability is rooted in the OpenSC library's handling of APDU responses from smart cards or USB devices. When a function that processes these responses is called, it may fail to check the return value. If the function fails (e.g., due to a malformed response), variables that were supposed to be initialized by that function remain uninitialized. Subsequent code then uses these uninitialized variables, leading to undefined behavior.
Technical Flow:
- An attacker crafts a malicious USB device or smart card.
- The device is inserted into a system running OpenSC.
- OpenSC sends an APDU command to the device.
- The device returns a specially crafted response that causes a function (e.g.,
sc_apdu_get_data) to fail. - The return value of the function is not checked, so the code proceeds.
- A variable that should have been populated with data from the response is left uninitialized.
- This uninitialized variable is used in a subsequent operation (e.g., memory copy, conditional check), leading to memory corruption or information disclosure.
Affected Components:
- OpenSC tools (e.g.,
opensc-tool,pkcs15-init) - PKCS#11 module
- minidriver
- CTK (Card Terminal Kernel)
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
Vulnerable Code Example (C):
int process_apdu(sc_card_t *card, u8 *buf, size_t len) {
int r;
u8 *data;
size_t data_len;
r = sc_apdu_get_data(card, buf, len, &data, &data_len);
// Missing check: if (r < 0) return r;
// data and data_len may be uninitialized if r < 0
memcpy(some_buffer, data, data_len); // Use of uninitialized data
return 0;
}
Patched Code Example:
int process_apdu(sc_card_t *card, u8 *buf, size_t len) {
int r;
u8 *data;
size_t data_len;
r = sc_apdu_get_data(card, buf, len, &data, &data_len);
if (r < 0) {
// Handle error
return r;
}
memcpy(some_buffer, data, data_len); // Safe now
return 0;
}
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team
Prerequisites:
- A programmable smart card or USB device (e.g., Java Card, FIDO2 token with custom firmware)
- OpenSC library installed on target system
- Physical access to the target
Exploitation Steps:
- Program the malicious device to return a malformed APDU response that triggers a function failure.
- Insert the device into the target system.
- Execute an OpenSC tool (e.g.,
opensc-tool -a) that processes APDUs. - The uninitialized variable may cause a crash (DoS) or leak memory contents.
Proof-of-Concept (Python using pyscard):
import smartcard.System as sys
from smartcard.util import toBytes
# Connect to reader
readers = sys.readers()
reader = readers[0]
connection = reader.createConnection()
connection.connect()
# Send a malformed APDU that causes a function to fail
# This is a simplified example; actual exploitation requires reverse engineering
apdu = toBytes("00 A4 04 00 0A FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF")
response, sw1, sw2 = connection.transmit(apdu)
print(f"Response: {response}, SW: {sw1:02X} {sw2:02X}")
Blue Team
Detection:
- Monitor for unusual smart card activity (e.g., repeated failed APDUs)
- Use endpoint detection and response (EDR) to detect crashes in OpenSC processes
- Implement application whitelisting for smart card tools
Mitigation:
- Disable automatic smart card handling if not needed
- Use a sandbox for smart card operations
- Apply memory protection (ASLR, DEP)
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
- File Hashes: (None available; monitor for modified OpenSC binaries)
- Process Names:
opensc-tool,pkcs15-init,opensc-explorer - Network: No network indicators (physical attack)
- Logs: System logs showing crashes in OpenSC processes (e.g., segfaults)
- Registry: (Windows)
HKLM\SOFTWARE\OpenSCmodifications
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2024_45617_OpenSC_Uninitialized_Variable {
meta:
description = "Detects vulnerable OpenSC code patterns with missing return value checks"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2025-04-10"
cve = "CVE-2024-45617"
strings:
$code1 = "sc_apdu_get_data" ascii wide nocase
$code2 = "sc_transmit_apdu" ascii wide nocase
$pattern1 = { 8B ?? 24 08 50 FF 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? 85 C0 74 ?? } // Example: call to function, missing check
condition:
$code1 or $code2 and #pattern1 > 0
}
Sigma Rule
title: CVE-2024-45617 OpenSC Uninitialized Variable Exploitation
id: 7a8b9c0d-1e2f-3a4b-5c6d-7e8f9a0b1c2d
status: experimental
description: Detects crashes or abnormal behavior in OpenSC processes indicative of exploitation
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
category: process_creation
product: windows
detection:
selection:
Image|endswith:
- '\opensc-tool.exe'
- '\pkcs15-init.exe'
- '\opensc-explorer.exe'
ExitCode: 0xC0000005 # Access violation
condition: selection
falsepositives:
- Legitimate crashes due to faulty hardware
level: high
Suricata Rule
alert tcp any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2024-45617 OpenSC APDU Exploitation Attempt"; flow:to_server; content:"|00 A4 04 00|"; depth:4; content:"|FF|"; within:10; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
Remediation & Mitigation
Immediate Actions:
- Disable OpenSC services if not required:
systemctl stop pcscd(Linux) or stopSCardSvr(Windows). - Restrict physical access to smart card readers.
- Monitor for crashes in OpenSC processes.
Long-term Fix:
- Apply patches from OpenSC maintainers when available.
- Implement input validation and return value checks in custom smart card applications.
- Use a memory-safe language (e.g., Rust) for new smart card tools.
Workaround:
- Use alternative smart card libraries (e.g.,
libpcsclitedirectly) with proper error handling.
Valters IT