☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 🐛 CWE-20
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-27131

CVE-2025-27131 Supply Chain Attack in Openharmony
📅 PUBLISHED: 2025-06-08 11:46 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-12 14:52 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.18%
👁️
0.18% probability
4.4× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1499
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 6.1
AV: L Attack Vector Local
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: N Confidentiality None
I: N Integrity None
A: H Availability High
6.1
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-27131 is a denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability in OpenHarmony v5.0.3 and prior versions. The flaw allows a local attacker to cause a system crash or resource exhaustion through improper input validation. With a CVSS score of 6.1 (Medium), the vulnerability requires local access and low privileges, making it a risk in multi-user or IoT environments where untrusted users have local shell access. No public exploit code or proof-of-concept is currently available, and the vendor has not released a patch.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

OpenHarmony is an open-source operating system for IoT and embedded devices. The vulnerability exists in the core OS kernel or system service layer, not in a specific package manager (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). However, organizations using OpenHarmony in their supply chain should assess exposure and apply mitigations.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • Attack Vector (AV): Local (L) – attacker must have local access.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L) – no special conditions required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): Low (L) – attacker needs basic user privileges.
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N) – no user action needed.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U) – impact confined to the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality (C): None (N) – no data exposure.
  • Integrity (I): None (N) – no data modification.
  • Availability (A): High (H) – system crash or resource exhaustion.

Threat Level: Medium. The vulnerability is not remotely exploitable and requires local access, but it can cause significant service disruption in shared or IoT environments.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability stems from improper input validation in a system service or kernel component of OpenHarmony. When a local attacker sends a specially crafted input (e.g., malformed IPC message, invalid system call argument, or oversized data), the component fails to sanitize the input, leading to a buffer overflow, infinite loop, or resource exhaustion. This results in a denial-of-service condition, potentially crashing the entire system or making it unresponsive.

Root Cause: Lack of bounds checking or input validation in the affected function. The component trusts user-supplied data without verifying its size or format, allowing an attacker to trigger undefined behavior.

Attack Vector: Local user with low privileges executes a malicious binary or script that interacts with the vulnerable service.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no patch is available, the following is a hypothetical comparison based on typical input validation fixes.

Vulnerable Code (C pseudocode):

void process_input(char *user_input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strcpy(buffer, user_input); // No bounds check
    // Process buffer...
}

Patched Code (C pseudocode):

void process_input(char *user_input) {
    char buffer[256];
    if (strlen(user_input) >= sizeof(buffer)) {
        return -1; // Reject oversized input
    }
    strcpy(buffer, user_input);
    // Process buffer...
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Exploitation)

No public exploit code exists. However, a local attacker could craft a proof-of-concept as follows:

  1. Identify the vulnerable service: Use ps or ls /proc to find system processes.
  2. Craft malicious input: Create a binary that sends an oversized or malformed IPC message to the target service.
  3. Trigger the vulnerability: Execute the binary as a low-privileged user.

Example PoC (Python):

import socket
import struct

# Assume vulnerable service listens on a Unix socket
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_UNIX, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.connect("/var/run/vuln_service.sock")
payload = b"A" * 4096  # Oversized input
sock.send(payload)
sock.close()

Blue Team (Detection & Hardening)

  • Monitor system logs: Look for crashes, segmentation faults, or service restarts.
  • Restrict local access: Use mandatory access controls (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) to limit user capabilities.
  • Apply resource limits: Use ulimit to restrict memory and file descriptor usage per user.
  • Enable kernel hardening: Use sysctl to enable ASLR, stack canaries, and other protections.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • System logs: Kernel panics, OOM killer messages, or service crashes in /var/log/messages or dmesg.
  • Process anomalies: Unexpected high CPU or memory usage by a low-privilege user process.
  • File artifacts: Malicious binaries or scripts in /tmp or user home directories.
  • Network indicators: Unusual IPC traffic on local sockets (e.g., Unix domain sockets).

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_27131_OpenHarmony_DoS {
    meta:
        description = "Detects potential exploit attempts for CVE-2025-27131"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-03-01"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-27131"
    strings:
        $s1 = "OpenHarmony" nocase
        $s2 = "process_input" nocase
        $s3 = "buffer overflow" nocase
    condition:
        any of ($s*) and filesize < 10MB
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2025-27131 OpenHarmony DoS Attempt
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
status: experimental
description: Detects local DoS attempts against OpenHarmony
author: Valters IT
logsource:
    product: linux
    service: syslog
detection:
    selection:
        - "kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request"
        - "kernel: segfault at"
        - "kernel: OOM killer"
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate kernel bugs
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert ip any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2025-27131 OpenHarmony DoS Attempt"; content:"|41 41 41 41|"; depth:100; reference:cve,2025-27131; classtype:attempted-dos; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

  • Immediate: Restrict local user access to the vulnerable system. Use chmod and chown to limit executable permissions.
  • Short-term: Monitor for vendor patches. Subscribe to OpenHarmony security advisories.
  • Long-term: Implement input validation in custom applications. Use fuzzing tools to identify similar vulnerabilities.
  • Workaround: If the vulnerable service is not critical, disable it via systemd or init scripts.

Valters IT – Securing your digital frontier.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

OpenHarmony
OpenHarmony 5.0.3

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-27131/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.