☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]

CVE-2025-31176

CVE-2025-31176 Denial of Service in Gnuplot
📅 PUBLISHED: 2025-03-27 15:06 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-17 01:07 UTC
[ OFFICIAL PATCH DEPLOYED ↓ ] FIX: LIKELY — 2 independent sources confirm fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.19%
👁️
0.19% probability
4.9× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
Country: USA License: Commercial
Patch available — upgrade to latest release
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
6.2
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-31176 describes a denial-of-service vulnerability in Gnuplot, a widely used portable command-line driven graphing utility. The flaw resides in the plot3d_points() function, which can be triggered to cause a segmentation fault, leading to a system crash. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 0.0, indicating that no official CVSS vector has been assigned, and the EPSS score is 0.0%, suggesting very low exploitation activity in the wild. No public proof-of-concept (PoC) code, exploit-db entries, or nuclei templates are currently available. The patch status is unknown, and no official fix has been released by the vendor.

This vulnerability is a classic memory safety issue that can be leveraged by an attacker to crash the Gnuplot application, potentially leading to a denial of service. Given the lack of a patch and the low exploitation probability, the immediate risk is limited, but organizations using Gnuplot in automated or critical workflows should monitor for updates.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 0.0 (Not yet assigned)
  • CVSS Vector: UNKNOWN
  • Attack Vector (AV): UNKNOWN
  • Attack Complexity (AC): UNKNOWN
  • Privileges Required (PR): UNKNOWN
  • User Interaction (UI): UNKNOWN
  • Scope (S): UNKNOWN
  • Confidentiality (C): UNKNOWN
  • Integrity (I): UNKNOWN
  • Availability (A): UNKNOWN
  • EPSS Score: 0.0% (Very low probability of exploitation)
  • Threat Level: Low (based on current information)

The lack of a CVSS vector and the low EPSS score suggest that this vulnerability is not currently a high-priority threat. However, the potential for a crash (denial of service) means it should not be ignored, especially in environments where Gnuplot is exposed to untrusted input.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability is located in the plot3d_points() function within Gnuplot's source code. This function is responsible for rendering 3D point plots. A segmentation fault (segfault) occurs when the function attempts to access memory that it is not permitted to, typically due to a null pointer dereference, buffer overflow, or use-after-free condition.

Root Cause Analysis:

  • The plot3d_points() function likely processes user-supplied data (e.g., from a data file or command-line input) to generate 3D plots.
  • A flaw in the input validation or memory management logic allows an attacker to craft a malicious input that causes the function to read or write to an invalid memory address.
  • This results in a segmentation fault, crashing the Gnuplot process.

Attack Vector:

  • An attacker could provide a specially crafted data file or command sequence to Gnuplot.
  • If Gnuplot is used in a server or automated pipeline (e.g., generating graphs from user-submitted data), this could be exploited remotely.
  • The crash could be used to disrupt services that depend on Gnuplot.

Impact:

  • Denial of Service (DoS): The primary impact is a crash of the Gnuplot application, potentially affecting any system or service relying on it.
  • No evidence of code execution or data exfiltration has been reported.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no official patch is available, a direct comparison cannot be made. However, based on the nature of the vulnerability, the fix would likely involve:

  • Adding input validation checks before processing data in plot3d_points().
  • Ensuring proper bounds checking on arrays or buffers.
  • Implementing null pointer checks before dereferencing pointers.
  • Using safer memory management functions (e.g., strncpy instead of strcpy).

Hypothetical vulnerable code pattern:

void plot3d_points(data_t *data) {
    // No check if data is NULL
    for (int i = 0; i < data->num_points; i++) {
        // Potential out-of-bounds access if num_points is incorrect
        point_t *p = &data->points[i];
        // ...
    }
}

Hypothetical patched code pattern:

void plot3d_points(data_t *data) {
    if (data == NULL) {
        return; // Handle null pointer
    }
    if (data->num_points > MAX_POINTS) {
        return; // Bounds check
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < data->num_points; i++) {
        point_t *p = &data->points[i];
        // ...
    }
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Exploitation)

Objective: Crash Gnuplot by triggering the vulnerability in plot3d_points().

Prerequisites:

  • Gnuplot installed on the target system.
  • Ability to pass a malicious data file or command to Gnuplot.

Steps:

  1. Create a malicious data file (e.g., malicious.dat) with crafted content designed to trigger the segfault.
  2. Run Gnuplot with the malicious file:
    gnuplot -e "plot 'malicious.dat' with points"
    
  3. Observe the crash (segmentation fault).

Note: Since no public PoC exists, the exact payload is unknown. The above is a generic approach.

Blue Team (Defense & Detection)

Detection:

  • Monitor for crashes of the gnuplot process (e.g., via system logs or process monitoring).
  • Look for unusual input files or command-line arguments passed to Gnuplot.
  • Use file integrity monitoring to detect creation of suspicious data files.

Mitigation:

  • Restrict access to Gnuplot to trusted users only.
  • If Gnuplot is used in a web application, sanitize all user input before passing it to Gnuplot.
  • Consider using a sandbox or container to isolate Gnuplot processes.
  • Monitor for updates from the Gnuplot project and apply patches when available.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Process Crash: Segmentation fault in gnuplot process.
  • Log Entries: System logs showing gnuplot terminated with signal SIGSEGV.
  • File Artifacts: Malicious data files (e.g., .dat, .plt) with unusual content.
  • Network Traffic: None expected (local vulnerability).

Example log entry:

kernel: [12345.678] gnuplot[1234]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f1234567890 sp 00007ff123456789 error 4 in libgnuplot.so[7f1234500000+2000]

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_31176_Gnuplot_Segfault {
    meta:
        description = "Detects potential exploitation of CVE-2025-31176 in Gnuplot"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31176"
    strings:
        $s1 = "plot3d_points" ascii wide nocase
        $s2 = "segfault" ascii wide nocase
        $s3 = "gnuplot" ascii wide nocase
    condition:
        any of ($s*) and filesize < 10MB
}

Sigma Rule

title: Gnuplot Segmentation Fault Detection
id: 8a9b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d
status: experimental
description: Detects segmentation faults in the gnuplot process, potentially indicating exploitation of CVE-2025-31176.
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
references:
    - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31176
logsource:
    product: linux
    service: syslog
detection:
    selection:
        - "gnuplot.*segfault"
        - "gnuplot.*SIGSEGV"
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate crashes due to other bugs
level: medium

Suricata Rule

alert tcp any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2025-31176 Gnuplot Potential Exploitation"; flow:to_server; content:"gnuplot"; nocase; content:"plot3d_points"; nocase; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Note: The Suricata rule is generic and may generate false positives. It should be tuned based on the environment.

Remediation & Mitigation

  1. Patch Status: No official patch is available. Monitor the Gnuplot project (http://www.gnuplot.info/) for updates.
  2. Workaround: Avoid using the plot3d_points() function with untrusted data. If possible, use alternative plotting functions.
  3. Access Control: Restrict execution of Gnuplot to trusted users and processes.
  4. Sandboxing: Run Gnuplot in a container or sandbox to limit the impact of a crash.
  5. Input Validation: If Gnuplot is used in a web application, implement strict input validation and sanitization before passing data to Gnuplot.
  6. Monitoring: Implement detection rules (YARA, Sigma, Suricata) to identify potential exploitation attempts.

Valters IT Signature


This report was generated by Valters IT Cyber Threat Intelligence Division.

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-31176/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.