☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 7.5 🐛 CWE-770
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-31496

CVE-2025-31496 Denial of Service in Apollo
📅 PUBLISHED: 2025-04-07 20:34 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-23 20:20 UTC
[ OFFICIAL PATCH DEPLOYED ↓ ] FIX: LIKELY — 2 independent sources confirm fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.42%
👁️
0.42% probability
10.5× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
Patch available — upgrade to latest release
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
7.5
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-31496 is a high-severity denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability in the Apollo Compiler, a query-based compiler for the GraphQL query language. The flaw resides in the validation logic for deeply nested and reused named fragments. Prior to version 1.27.0, the compiler processed named fragments once per fragment spread during validation, leading to exponential resource consumption. An attacker can craft a malicious GraphQL query with deeply nested and reused fragments to exhaust CPU and memory resources, causing a denial of service. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High) and is fixed in version 1.27.0. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code is available at this time.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability affects the apollo-compiler package, which is distributed via npm and Rust’s crate registry. Organizations using Apollo Compiler in their GraphQL services should immediately update to version 1.27.0 or later. Since the package is a core dependency for GraphQL validation, any application that exposes a GraphQL endpoint using a vulnerable version is at risk. Supply chain security teams should verify that no downstream dependencies pin an affected version.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Base Score: 7.5 (High)
  • Attack Vector: Network (AV:N) – The vulnerability can be exploited remotely.
  • Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) – No special conditions required.
  • Privileges Required: None (PR:N) – No authentication needed.
  • User Interaction: None (UI:N) – No user action required.
  • Scope: Unchanged (S:U) – The impact is confined to the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality Impact: None (C:N) – No data exposure.
  • Integrity Impact: None (I:N) – No data modification.
  • Availability Impact: High (A:H) – Complete denial of service.

Threat Level: High. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable with low complexity and no authentication, making it attractive for DoS attacks against GraphQL services.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability lies in the validation phase of Apollo Compiler, specifically in how it handles named fragments in GraphQL queries. GraphQL allows the use of named fragments to reuse common field selections. When a query contains deeply nested fragment spreads that reference the same named fragment multiple times, the compiler’s validation logic processes each fragment spread independently, leading to exponential time complexity.

Root Cause: The validation algorithm does not cache or memoize the validation results for named fragments. Instead, it re-validates the fragment each time it is encountered in a spread. When fragments are nested deeply (e.g., fragment A spreads B, B spreads C, etc.) and reused at multiple levels, the number of validation operations grows exponentially with the depth of nesting.

Example of a Malicious Query:

query {
  field1 {
    ...FragA
  }
}

fragment FragA on Type {
  field2 {
    ...FragB
  }
}

fragment FragB on Type {
  field3 {
    ...FragA
  }
}

In this example, FragA and FragB reference each other, creating a cycle. The compiler’s validation may enter an infinite loop or consume excessive resources due to repeated processing.

Impact: An attacker can send a single crafted query to a GraphQL endpoint using a vulnerable Apollo Compiler, causing the server to consume all available CPU and memory, leading to a denial of service for legitimate users.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Vulnerable Code (Pre-1.27.0): The validation logic iterates over each fragment spread and recursively validates the referenced fragment without caching. This leads to exponential processing for deeply nested and reused fragments.

// Simplified vulnerable logic
fn validate_fragment(fragment: &Fragment, context: &mut ValidationContext) {
    for spread in &fragment.spreads {
        let referenced = context.get_fragment(spread.name);
        validate_fragment(referenced, context); // No caching
    }
}

Patched Code (1.27.0): The fix introduces a cache (e.g., a HashSet or HashMap) to track already-validated fragments. Before validating a fragment, the compiler checks if it has already been processed. If so, it skips re-validation, breaking the exponential chain.

// Simplified patched logic
fn validate_fragment(fragment: &Fragment, context: &mut ValidationContext, visited: &mut HashSet<FragmentId>) {
    if !visited.insert(fragment.id) {
        return; // Already validated
    }
    for spread in &fragment.spreads {
        let referenced = context.get_fragment(spread.name);
        validate_fragment(referenced, context, visited);
    }
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Attack Simulation)

Objective: Craft a malicious GraphQL query to trigger exponential resource consumption.

Lab Setup:

  1. Deploy a vulnerable GraphQL service using Apollo Compiler version 1.26.0 or earlier.
  2. Use a tool like curl or a GraphQL client to send the malicious query.

Malicious Query Example:

query {
  a {
    ...F1
  }
}

fragment F1 on Query {
  b {
    ...F2
  }
}

fragment F2 on Query {
  c {
    ...F3
  }
}

fragment F3 on Query {
  d {
    ...F4
  }
}

# Continue nesting fragments F4 through F20, each referencing the next
# Finally, fragment F20 references F1 to create a cycle
fragment F20 on Query {
  z {
    ...F1
  }
}

Execution:

curl -X POST http://target/graphql -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"query": "query { a { ...F1 } } fragment F1 on Query { b { ...F2 } } ... (full nested query)"}'

Expected Result: The server CPU usage spikes to 100% and the service becomes unresponsive.

Blue Team (Defense & Detection)

Defensive Measures:

  • Update: Immediately upgrade Apollo Compiler to version 1.27.0 or later.
  • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on GraphQL queries to prevent abuse.
  • Query Complexity Analysis: Use tools like graphql-query-complexity to reject overly complex queries.
  • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy WAF rules to block queries with excessive nesting or fragment reuse.

Detection:

  • Monitor for GraphQL queries with high depth or fragment count.
  • Alert on CPU or memory spikes correlated with GraphQL requests.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network: GraphQL POST requests with deeply nested fragment definitions (depth > 10).
  • Logs: Server logs showing repeated validation of the same fragment IDs.
  • Performance: Sudden CPU or memory exhaustion on GraphQL servers.
  • Error Messages: Timeout or out-of-memory errors in application logs.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_31496_GraphQL_Fragment_DoS {
    meta:
        description = "Detects malicious GraphQL queries with deeply nested fragments targeting CVE-2025-31496"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        reference = "CVE-2025-31496"
    strings:
        $fragment = /fragment\s+\w+\s+on\s+\w+\s*\{[^}]*\.\.\.\w+/ nocase
        $deep_nest = /\.\.\.\w+.*\.\.\.\w+.*\.\.\.\w+/ nocase
    condition:
        #fragment > 5 and #deep_nest > 3
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2025-31496 GraphQL Fragment DoS Detection
id: 8a4b3c2d-1e5f-4a7b-9c8d-0e1f2a3b4c5d
status: experimental
description: Detects GraphQL queries with excessive fragment nesting indicating exploitation of CVE-2025-31496
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: apache
detection:
    selection:
        http.method: POST
        http.url|contains: "/graphql"
        http.body|re: 'fragment\s+\w+\s+on\s+\w+\s*\{[^}]*\.\.\.\w+'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate complex GraphQL queries
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2025-31496 GraphQL Fragment DoS Attempt"; flow:to_server; http.method; content:"POST"; http.uri; content:"/graphql"; http.request_body; content:"fragment"; pcre:"/fragment\s+\w+\s+on\s+\w+\s*\{[^}]*\.\.\.\w+/"; classtype:attempted-dos; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Patch: Upgrade Apollo Compiler to version 1.27.0 or later.
  2. Workaround: If immediate patching is not possible, implement input validation to reject queries with excessive fragment depth (e.g., depth > 10).
  3. Rate Limiting: Apply rate limiting per IP or session to GraphQL endpoints.

Long-Term Measures:

  • Query Cost Analysis: Integrate a query cost analysis library (e.g., graphql-query-complexity) to reject expensive queries.
  • Monitoring: Set up alerts for CPU/memory anomalies and GraphQL query patterns.
  • Security Audits: Regularly review dependencies for known vulnerabilities.

Valters IT Signature: This report was generated by Valters IT DevSecOps & CTI Expert System. All analysis is based on publicly available information and should be verified before action.

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-31496/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.