CVE-2025-34140
Executive Summary
CVE-2025-34140 is an authorization bypass vulnerability in ETQ Reliance (legacy CG and NXG SaaS platforms). By appending a specific URI suffix to certain API endpoints, an unauthenticated attacker can bypass access control checks and retrieve limited sensitive resources. The root cause is a misconfiguration in API authorization logic, which has been corrected in SE.2025.1 and 2025.1.2. No public exploit code or proof-of-concept is available at this time.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
- CVSS Score: 0.0 (No official CVSS vector assigned)
- Attack Vector: Network
- Attack Complexity: Low
- Privileges Required: None
- User Interaction: None
- Scope: Unchanged
- Confidentiality Impact: Low (limited sensitive resources)
- Integrity Impact: None
- Availability Impact: None
- Threat Level: Medium (due to unauthenticated access to sensitive data)
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The vulnerability resides in the API authorization layer of ETQ Reliance. The application uses URI-based access control checks. By appending a specific URI suffix to certain API endpoints, the authorization logic fails to properly validate the request, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to retrieve limited sensitive resources. The root cause is a misconfiguration in the API authorization logic, likely a missing or incorrect check on the URI path.
Attack Vector:
- Attacker identifies an API endpoint that normally requires authentication.
- Attacker appends a specific URI suffix (e.g.,
?bypass=trueor/../) to the endpoint. - The authorization logic incorrectly processes the modified URI, bypassing access control.
- Attacker retrieves limited sensitive resources (e.g., configuration details, user metadata).
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
Vulnerable Code (Conceptual):
# Vulnerable authorization check
def authorize_request(request):
if request.path.startswith("/api/secure/"):
# Missing check for URI suffix
return True
return False
Patched Code (Conceptual):
# Patched authorization check
def authorize_request(request):
if request.path.startswith("/api/secure/"):
# Validate no unauthorized suffix
if "?" in request.path or "/../" in request.path:
return False
return True
return False
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team
Prerequisites:
- Access to an ETQ Reliance instance (legacy CG or NXG SaaS)
- Knowledge of a valid API endpoint (e.g.,
/api/secure/users)
Exploitation Steps:
- Identify a target API endpoint:
https://target.etq.com/api/secure/users - Append a URI suffix:
https://target.etq.com/api/secure/users?bypass=true - Send GET request without authentication.
- Observe response containing limited sensitive data.
Example cURL:
curl -X GET "https://target.etq.com/api/secure/users?bypass=true" -H "Accept: application/json"
Blue Team
Detection:
- Monitor for requests to API endpoints with unexpected URI suffixes.
- Alert on unauthenticated requests to
/api/secure/endpoints. - Review logs for patterns like
?bypass=true,/../, or other path traversal attempts.
Hunting:
- Search for HTTP requests with
?bypassor?authorizationparameters. - Look for 200 responses to
/api/secure/endpoints without authentication headers.
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
- Network: HTTP GET requests to
/api/secure/*with URI suffixes like?bypass=true,/../, or?authorization=false - Logs: Unauthenticated 200 responses to
/api/secure/endpoints - File: No file-based IOCs
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2025_34140_ETQ_Reliance_Bypass {
meta:
description = "Detects URI suffix patterns used in CVE-2025-34140"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2025-04-17"
reference = "CVE-2025-34140"
strings:
$suffix1 = "?bypass=true"
$suffix2 = "/../"
$suffix3 = "?authorization=false"
$api_path = "/api/secure/"
condition:
any of ($suffix*) and $api_path
}
Sigma Rule
title: ETQ Reliance Authorization Bypass Attempt
id: 7a8b9c0d-1e2f-3a4b-5c6d-7e8f9a0b1c2d
status: experimental
description: Detects attempts to exploit CVE-2025-34140 by appending URI suffixes to API endpoints
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-17
logsource:
category: webserver
product: apache
detection:
selection:
cs-uri-query|contains:
- '?bypass=true'
- '/../'
- '?authorization=false'
cs-uri-stem|startswith: '/api/secure/'
condition: selection
falsepositives:
- Legitimate use of similar parameters (unlikely)
level: high
Suricata Rule
alert http any any -> any any (msg:"ETQ Reliance Authorization Bypass Attempt (CVE-2025-34140)"; flow:to_server; http.uri; content:"/api/secure/"; http.uri; content:"?bypass=true" or content:"/../" or content:"?authorization=false"; classtype:attempted-recon; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
Remediation & Mitigation
Immediate Actions:
- Upgrade to SE.2025.1 or 2025.1.2 (patched versions).
- If upgrade is not possible, implement a WAF rule to block URI suffixes like
?bypass=true,/../, and?authorization=falseon/api/secure/endpoints. - Review and harden API authorization logic to validate the entire URI path.
Long-term:
- Implement strict input validation for all API endpoints.
- Use a centralized authorization framework (e.g., OAuth 2.0, RBAC).
- Conduct regular security audits of API authorization logic.
Valters IT
DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence Expert