☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]

CVE-2025-54969

CVE-2025-54969 CSRF in BAE SOCET GXP
📅 PUBLISHED: 2025-10-27 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-18 17:12 UTC
⏳ SCORE PENDING — ANALYSIS IN PROGRESS [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.13%
👁️
0.13% probability
3.3× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
VULNERABLE: UNKNOWN / CHECK VENDOR
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
SOON
PENDING NVD
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-54969 identifies a critical Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BAE Systems’ SOCET GXP, a geospatial intelligence (GEOINT) analysis platform. The vulnerability resides in the Job Status Service, which lacks CSRF protections. An attacker can trick an authenticated user into unknowingly submitting malicious requests, potentially leading to unauthorized job status changes, data manipulation, or service disruption. This vulnerability is particularly dangerous in high-security environments where SOCET GXP is used for defense and intelligence analysis. No public exploit code or proof-of-concept is currently available, but the risk is elevated due to the sensitive nature of the software.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to an open-source package manager (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). It affects a proprietary, closed-source application (BAE SOCET GXP). Therefore, supply chain security considerations are limited to the software vendor’s update distribution and integrity verification.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

CVSS Score: 0.0 (NVD) – However, based on the vulnerability description and impact, a more realistic score is 8.8 (High).

CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

  • Attack Vector (AV): Network – The attack is performed over the network.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low – No special conditions are required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None – The attacker does not need to be authenticated.
  • User Interaction (UI): Required – The victim must click a malicious link or visit a malicious site.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged – The vulnerability does not affect other components.
  • Confidentiality (C): High – Sensitive job data could be exposed.
  • Integrity (I): High – Job statuses and data can be modified.
  • Availability (A): High – Service disruption is possible.

Threat Level: High. The vulnerability is easy to exploit (social engineering) and can lead to severe consequences in a GEOINT environment.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The SOCET GXP Job Status Service is a web-based component that allows users to monitor and manage processing jobs. The service accepts HTTP requests to perform actions such as starting, stopping, or querying jobs. Due to the absence of CSRF tokens or origin validation, an attacker can craft a malicious HTML page or link that, when clicked by an authenticated user, sends forged requests to the Job Status Service.

Attack Flow:

  1. The attacker identifies a target user who is authenticated to the SOCET GXP web interface.
  2. The attacker creates a malicious webpage or email containing a hidden form or image tag that triggers a request to the Job Status Service (e.g., http://target-socet/jobstatus?action=stop&jobid=123).
  3. The victim, while authenticated, visits the malicious page.
  4. The victim’s browser automatically sends the forged request, including any session cookies, to the Job Status Service.
  5. The service processes the request as if it came from the legitimate user, performing the attacker’s desired action.

Impact: An attacker could stop critical processing jobs, modify job parameters, or extract job metadata, leading to operational disruption or intelligence leaks.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since SOCET GXP is proprietary, exact code snippets are not publicly available. However, the vulnerability is a classic CSRF issue.

Vulnerable Code (Conceptual):

# Vulnerable endpoint - no CSRF check
@app.route('/jobstatus', methods=['POST'])
def job_status():
    action = request.form['action']
    job_id = request.form['jobid']
    # Process action without verifying origin
    process_job_action(action, job_id)
    return "OK"

Patched Code (Conceptual):

# Patched endpoint - CSRF token validation
@app.route('/jobstatus', methods=['POST'])
def job_status():
    csrf_token = request.form.get('csrf_token')
    if not validate_csrf_token(csrf_token, session):
        return "CSRF validation failed", 403
    action = request.form['action']
    job_id = request.form['jobid']
    process_job_action(action, job_id)
    return "OK"

The patch introduces a CSRF token that is tied to the user’s session and must be included in every state-changing request. The server validates the token before processing the action.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Exploitation)

Prerequisites:

  • A target running SOCET GXP < 4.6.0.2 with the Job Status Service exposed.
  • An authenticated user session (cookies).

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Craft a malicious HTML page that sends a POST request to the Job Status Service.
  2. Host the page on an attacker-controlled server or use a phishing email.
  3. Trick the victim into visiting the page while authenticated.

Example Malicious HTML:

<html>
<body>
<h1>Click me for a surprise!</h1>
<form action="http://target-socet/jobstatus" method="POST" id="csrf-form">
  <input type="hidden" name="action" value="stop">
  <input type="hidden" name="jobid" value="12345">
</form>
<script>
  document.getElementById('csrf-form').submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>

Note: No public exploit code is available. The above is a conceptual example.

Blue Team (Detection & Defense)

Detection:

  • Monitor for unusual POST requests to /jobstatus endpoints without a valid Referer header.
  • Alert on multiple job status changes from a single user in a short time frame.
  • Use web application firewalls (WAF) to block requests missing CSRF tokens.

Defense:

  • Immediate: Apply the vendor patch (upgrade to 4.6.0.2).
  • Compensating Controls: Implement a reverse proxy that adds CSRF validation or requires a custom header (e.g., X-Requested-By: SOCET).
  • User Training: Educate users about phishing and social engineering risks.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network IOCs:
    • HTTP requests to /jobstatus with Referer header missing or from an unexpected domain.
    • Repeated POST requests to /jobstatus from a single IP in a short period.
  • Host IOCs:
    • Unusual job status changes in SOCET GXP logs (e.g., jobs stopped without user action).
    • Browser history or cache containing links to external domains with suspicious form submissions.
  • Log IOCs:
    • Web server logs showing POST /jobstatus requests with no Origin or Referer header.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_54969_CSRF_Exploit {
    meta:
        description = "Detects CSRF exploit attempts against SOCET GXP Job Status Service"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        cve = "CVE-2025-54969"
    strings:
        $csrf_form = /<form[^>]*action=["']http:\/\/[^"']*\/jobstatus["']/
        $csrf_hidden = /<input[^>]*name=["'](action|jobid)["']/
        $auto_submit = /document\.getElementById\(['"]csrf-form['"]\)\.submit\(\)/
    condition:
        all of them
}

Sigma Rule

title: SOCET GXP CSRF Exploit Attempt
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects potential CSRF attacks against SOCET GXP Job Status Service
author: Valters IT
date: 2025/04/10
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: apache
detection:
    selection:
        cs-method: 'POST'
        c-uri: '/jobstatus'
        cs-referer: 
            - ''
            - 'null'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate requests from internal tools without Referer header
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
    msg:"CVE-2025-54969 SOCET GXP CSRF Exploit Attempt";
    flow:to_server,established;
    content:"POST"; http_method;
    content:"/jobstatus"; http_uri;
    pcre:"/Referer:\s*$/Hi";
    sid:10000001;
    rev:1;
    reference:cve,2025-54969;
    classtype:attempted-user;
    priority:1;
)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Upgrade to SOCET GXP version 4.6.0.2 or later.
  2. Verify the integrity of the update using vendor-provided checksums.

Compensating Controls (if patching is delayed):

  • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy rules to block requests to /jobstatus without a valid Referer or Origin header.
  • Reverse Proxy: Add a layer that requires a custom header (e.g., X-CSRF-Token) for all state-changing requests.
  • Session Hardening: Implement SameSite cookies (e.g., SameSite=Strict) to prevent cross-origin requests from including cookies.
  • Network Segmentation: Restrict access to the Job Status Service to trusted internal networks only.

Long-Term Recommendations:

  • Security Audits: Regularly audit web services for CSRF and other common vulnerabilities.
  • Developer Training: Ensure developers understand CSRF prevention techniques (tokens, double-submit cookies, etc.).
  • Incident Response: Update incident response playbooks to include CSRF-specific scenarios.

Valters IT
Securing Digital Frontiers

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-54969/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.