☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 🐛 CWE-20
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2025-6969

CVE-2025-6969 Denial of Service in Openharmony
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-03-16 07:10 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-12 14:52 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: <0.01%
👁️
<0.01% probability
<1× above the median CVE
Tier: LOW
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1499
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: China License: Open Source
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 5.0
AV: L Attack Vector Local
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: N Confidentiality None
I: N Integrity None
A: H Availability High
5.0
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-6969 is a denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability in OpenHarmony v5.1.0 and prior versions. The flaw allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service through improper input validation. With a CVSS score of 5.0 (Medium), the vulnerability requires local access and low privileges, but no user interaction. The impact is limited to availability, with no confidentiality or integrity compromise. The EPSS score is 0.0%, indicating a very low probability of exploitation in the wild. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code is available at this time.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 5.0 (Medium)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Attack Vector: Local (AV:L) – The attacker must have local access to the system.
  • Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) – No special conditions are required.
  • Privileges Required: Low (PR:L) – The attacker needs basic user privileges.
  • User Interaction: None (UI:N) – No user action is needed.
  • Scope: Unchanged (S:U) – The vulnerability does not affect other components.
  • Confidentiality Impact: None (C:N)
  • Integrity Impact: None (I:N)
  • Availability Impact: High (A:H) – Successful exploitation leads to a denial of service.

Threat Level: Medium. The vulnerability is locally exploitable with low privileges, but the lack of public exploits and low EPSS score reduces immediate risk.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in improper input validation within OpenHarmony. A local attacker can craft a malicious input that, when processed by the system, causes a denial of service. The exact component is not specified, but it likely involves a system service or driver that fails to handle malformed data correctly. The attack could lead to system crashes, resource exhaustion, or service unavailability.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

No specific code snippets are available due to the lack of patch information. However, the vulnerability is related to improper input validation. A typical fix would involve adding input sanitization and bounds checking.

Vulnerable Code (Hypothetical):

void process_input(char *input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strcpy(buffer, input); // No bounds checking
}

Patched Code (Hypothetical):

void process_input(char *input) {
    char buffer[256];
    strncpy(buffer, input, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0';
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Since no public exploit exists, a red team would need to reverse-engineer the vulnerable component. The attack vector is local, so the attacker must have a user account on the target system. The exploit would involve sending a specially crafted input to the vulnerable service.

Hypothetical Exploit (Python):

import socket

def exploit(target_ip, target_port):
    sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
    sock.connect((target_ip, target_port))
    payload = b"A" * 10000  # Large payload to cause overflow
    sock.send(payload)
    sock.close()

if __name__ == "__main__":
    exploit("127.0.0.1", 8080)

Blue Team

Blue team should monitor for unusual local process behavior, such as crashes or high resource usage. Implement input validation and rate limiting on local services.

Detection Steps:

  1. Monitor system logs for crashes or service restarts.
  2. Use file integrity monitoring to detect changes to critical binaries.
  3. Implement application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized code execution.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • File Hashes: None available.
  • Network Indicators: None (local attack).
  • System Logs: Unexpected crashes or service restarts in /var/log/syslog or dmesg.
  • Process Anomalies: High CPU or memory usage by system processes.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2025_6969_OpenHarmony_DOS {
    meta:
        description = "Detects potential exploitation of CVE-2025-6969"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
    strings:
        $s1 = "OpenHarmony" nocase
        $s2 = "5.1.0" nocase
    condition:
        $s1 and $s2
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2025-6969 OpenHarmony DoS Attempt
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects local DoS attempts against OpenHarmony
author: Valters IT
logsource:
    product: linux
    service: syslog
detection:
    selection:
        - EventID: 1001
          Message: "*crash*"
        - EventID: 6005
          Message: "*service*"
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate system crashes
level: medium

Suricata Rule

alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"CVE-2025-6969 OpenHarmony DoS Attempt"; flow:to_server; content:"OpenHarmony"; nocase; content:"5.1.0"; nocase; classtype:attempted-dos; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

  1. Patch: Apply the official patch from OpenHarmony when available.
  2. Workaround: Restrict local user access to the vulnerable service.
  3. Input Validation: Implement strict input validation and bounds checking.
  4. Monitoring: Enable logging and monitoring for unusual system behavior.
  5. Least Privilege: Ensure users have only necessary privileges.

Valters IT

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

OpenHarmony
OpenHarmony 5.1.0

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2025-6969/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.