☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 9.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N 🐛 CWE-79
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-100133

CVE-2026-100133 Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-10-13 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-14 05:00 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🥷 MITRE: T1059
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: Unknown (no version range provided in CVE data)
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 9.3
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: R User Interaction Required
S: C Scope Changed
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: N Availability None
9.3
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-100133 is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting Adobe Commerce, the enterprise e-commerce platform (Magento). An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form fields, which is then persisted server-side and executed in the browser of any user who views the affected page. With a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.3 (Critical), a scope change (S:C), and High confidentiality and integrity impact, successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, account takeover, unauthorized administrative actions, and persistent compromise of the storefront or admin panel. No public proof-of-concept, exploit code, or patch is currently available, and FIRST.org has not yet assigned an EPSS score.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

The vulnerability is classified as CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), specifically the stored (persistent) XSS subtype. Unlike reflected XSS, stored XSS occurs when attacker-supplied input is written to a persistent data store — such as a database record, product attribute, customer profile, order note, review, or CMS block — and later rendered into HTML responses without sufficient output encoding or context-aware escaping.

The NVD description confirms:

  • Injection vector: "vulnerable form fields" — i.e., input accepted through the platform's forms that is not adequately sanitized before storage.
  • Execution trigger: "Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field."
  • Impact: "potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session."
  • Scope: Changed (S:C), meaning exploitation can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component's original security authority — for example, moving from a low-privileged storefront context into an administrative session.

The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N indicates:

  • Attack Vector (Network): Exploitable remotely over the internet.
  • Attack Complexity (Low): No specialized conditions or race windows are required.
  • Privileges Required (None): The attacker does not need prior authentication to inject the payload. This is significant — it suggests injection is possible from an unauthenticated context (e.g., a public-facing form), or that the vulnerable form does not enforce adequate authorization.
  • User Interaction (Required): A victim must browse to the page rendering the stored payload. This is the standard XSS prerequisite and only marginally reduces risk in a high-traffic e-commerce environment.
  • Scope (Changed): The vulnerability in the vulnerable form field component can impact the broader application session, breaking the security boundary between the injection context and the victim's authenticated session (including potentially privileged admin sessions).
  • Confidentiality (High) / Integrity (High) / Availability (None): Attackers can read sensitive data (session tokens, CSRF tokens, customer PII, order data) and perform actions as the victim, but the flaw does not directly cause denial of service.

Important accuracy note: No specific function names, class names, file paths, URL endpoints, or parameter names are disclosed in the NVD description or CNA title. This report therefore describes the vulnerability at the class level. Claims about exact controllers, templates, or database tables would be speculative and are deliberately omitted.

Exploitation Scenarios

No public proof-of-concept is available for CVE-2026-100133. The attack chain below is inferred strictly from the vulnerability class (stored XSS in a web application form field) and the CVSS characteristics provided. Specific implementation details are intentionally generalized.

  1. Reconnaissance / Target Identification The attacker identifies an internet-facing Adobe Commerce / Magento storefront. Public fingerprinting can be performed via Shodan using the dorks listed in the METADATA section (e.g., http.title:"Magento Admin" or http.html:"Magento"). Because the vector shows PR:N, the attacker assumes no prior authentication is needed to reach the injectable form field, so publicly accessible forms become the primary target set.

  2. Triggering the Flaw (Injection) The attacker submits crafted input containing HTML/JavaScript into a "vulnerable form field" — a field that the application persists to storage and later renders without proper escaping. Because the flaw is CWE-79 and the input is stored, the payload survives across requests and is served to subsequent visitors. The attacker does not need victim interaction at the injection stage (AC:L, PR:N).

  3. Payload / Execution Method At the class level, the payload is a browser-executed script embedded in a stored field. When any user — including an administrator reviewing the record — browses to the page that renders the field, the JavaScript executes in that user's browser context, under the origin of the Adobe Commerce application. The exact execution sink (e.g., how the field is embedded into the response) is not disclosed in the CVE data and cannot be asserted.

  4. Post-Exploitation Impact Because scope is Changed and confidentiality/integrity are High, the script can, in the victim's authenticated context: read and exfiltrate session cookies or tokens (where not protected by HttpOnly), perform authenticated actions on the victim's behalf (including CSRF-token-assisted requests), manipulate displayed data, and pivot toward administrative control. Against an admin victim, this yields potential full application compromise; against a customer, it yields account takeover. Persistence of the payload means every subsequent visitor to the affected page is a potential victim — a force-multiplier typical of stored XSS in high-traffic commerce sites. Availability is unaffected (A:N), so no direct service disruption is expected.

Impact Assessment

  • Confidentiality (High): Session tokens, personally identifiable information (PII), order and payment-related data displayed in the user's session, and administrative interfaces are all potentially exposed to the injected script.
  • Integrity (High): The attacker can act as the victim — modifying account details, placing or altering orders, changing content, and (with an admin victim) altering store configuration or injecting further malicious content.
  • Availability (None): The flaw does not directly degrade service availability.
  • Scope (Changed): The most severe attribute. A flaw in a form-field component escapes its original security boundary and impacts the broader application session. This is what pushes the base score to 9.3 despite requiring User Interaction.
  • Blast Radius: Any Adobe Commerce deployment exposing the affected form field to untrusted input. Because stored XSS executes for every viewer of the poisoned page, a single successful injection can compromise an unlimited number of sessions over time. E-commerce environments routinely involve privileged admin users, making privilege escalation to full store compromise plausible.
  • Business Risk: Customer account takeover, fraudulent transactions, theft of PII (regulatory exposure under GDPR/CCPA/PCI-DSS), brand and reputational damage, and potential downstream supply-chain effects if the storefront is used to serve malicious content to customers.

Detection Guidance

Sigma Rule

title: Potential Stored XSS Injection Attempt Against Adobe Commerce Form Fields
id: 8f3c1a72-4b9e-4d21-9c0a-7e5f2ab6d913
status: experimental
description: Detects common XSS payload patterns submitted to web form fields that may indicate an attempt to exploit stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities such as CVE-2026-100133 in Adobe Commerce.
references:
  - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-100133
author: valtersit.com
date: 2026/01/01
tags:
  - attack.t1059
  - attack.t1189
  - cve.2026.100133
logsource:
  category: webserver
  product: apache
detection:
  selection_method:
    cs-method:
      - POST
      - PUT
  selection_payload:
    cs-uri-query|contains:
      - '<script'
      - 'javascript:'
      - 'onerror='
      - 'onload='
      - '<svg'
      - 'document.cookie'
      - '<img src=x'
  condition: selection_method and selection_payload
falsepositives:
  - Security scanners and penetration testing tools
  - Legitimate content containing code snippets in documentation forms
level: medium

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_100133_Stored_XSS_AdobeCommerce
{
    meta:
        description = "Detects stored XSS payload indicators associated with CVE-2026-100133 in Adobe Commerce"
        author = "valtersit.com"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-100133"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        severity = "critical"

    strings:
        $xss1 = "<script" ascii nocase
        $xss2 = "javascript:" ascii nocase
        $xss3 = "onerror=" ascii nocase
        $xss4 = "onload=" ascii nocase
        $xss5 = "document.cookie" ascii nocase
        $xss6 = "document.location" ascii nocase
        $xss7 = "XMLHttpRequest" ascii nocase
        $xss8 = "fetch(" ascii nocase

    condition:
        any of ($xss*) and filesize < 1MB
}

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"CVE-2026-100133 Possible Stored XSS Injection Attempt Against Adobe Commerce Form Field"; flow:established,to_server; http.method; content:"POST"; http.request_body; content:"<script"; nocase; http.request_body; content:"</script>"; nocase; distance:0; reference:cve,2026-100133; classtype:web-application-attack; sid:2026100133; rev:1;)

Elastic Detection

sequence by source.ip with maxspan=2m
  [network where http.request.method == "POST" and
   wildcard(http.request.body, "*<script*", "*javascript:*", "*onerror=*", "*onload=*")]

Splunk SPL Query

index=web sourcetype=access_combined (method=POST OR method=PUT)
| eval body=coalesce(form_data, request_body, "")
| where match(body, "(?i)<script|javascript:|onerror=|onload=|document\.cookie")
| stats count values(url) as targeted_urls by src_ip, useragent
| sort - count

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="web,appsec,cve-2026-100133,">
  <rule id="100113" level="10">
    <if_sid>31100,31103,31104</if_sid>
    <field name="url">\.</field>
    <regex type="pcre2">(?i)(<script|javascript:|onerror=|onload=|document\.cookie)</regex>
    <description>CVE-2026-100133: Possible stored XSS payload submitted to Adobe Commerce form field</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1059</id>
      <id>T1189</id>
    </mitre>
    <group>cve_2026_100133,web_attack,</group>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch confidence: 0/4 — UNPATCHED. No patch evidence exists from any tracked source; no vendor advisory, fixed version, or affected-version range is published in the CVE data.

  1. Immediate Mitigations (no patch available)

    • Implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with XSS filtering and deploy virtual patching rules targeting <script, event handlers (onerror, onload), and javascript: URIs in submitted form fields.
    • Deploy a Content Security Policy (CSP) with restrictive script-src directives (avoid unsafe-inline) to neutralize inline script execution even if injection succeeds.
    • Enforce HttpOnly and Secure flags on session cookies to reduce session-token theft via injected script.
    • Reduce exposure of administrative interfaces and forms to the public internet; restrict admin access via IP allowlisting or VPN.
    • Enable input validation and output encoding at the application edge where feasible (context-aware escaping).
  2. Patch / Upgrade Steps

    • Monitor Adobe's security bulletin page for the official Adobe Commerce / Magento security patch addressing CVE-2026-100133. No fixed version is currently published.
    • Until a patch is available, treat the deployment as exposed and prioritize compensating controls in step 1.
    • When a patch is released, apply it immediately and subscribe to Adobe's security notification channels to minimize the window of exposure.
  3. Long-Term Hardening

    • Adopt a secure SDLC with mandatory context-aware output encoding for all user-controllable data.
    • Integrate SAST/DAST tooling into CI/CD pipelines to catch XSS regressions before deployment.
    • Maintain a vulnerability-management program with continuous monitoring of e-commerce platform advisories.
    • Apply least-privilege principles to admin accounts and enforce strong authentication (MFA) so that a hijacked session has reduced reach.
    • Conduct periodic penetration testing focused on stored XSS in all user-facing and admin-facing forms.

References

  1. NVD — CVE-2026-100133: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-100133
  2. MITRE CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'): https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html
  3. Adobe Security Bulletins (Adobe Commerce / Magento advisories): https://helpx.adobe.com/security/security-bulletins.html
  4. OWASP Cross Site Scripting Prevention Cheat Sheet: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross_Site_Scripting_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
  5. CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog (current status: CVE-2026-100133 NOT listed): https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog

Threat actor / exploit-in-the-wild status: No public proof-of-concept, no exploit code, no Nuclei template, and no CISA KEV listing have been observed for CVE-2026-100133 as of this report. No known threat actor campaigns are associated with this CVE in the available data.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

product:"Adobe"
title:"Adobe"

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-100133/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.