☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-78
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-102256

CVE-2026-102256 OS Command Injection in SonicWall
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-10-07 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-08 05:00 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🥷 MITRE: T1190
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: UNKNOWN
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 7.8
AV: L Attack Vector Local
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
7.8
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-102256 is a post-authentication OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in the SonicWall SMA1000 appliance that allows an authenticated remote attacker operating with administrator privileges to execute arbitrary operating system commands, resulting in remote code execution. The flaw requires high privilege (administrator) and is triggered under "specific conditions," meaning exploitation is contingent on particular appliance states or configurations, but once triggered it yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the underlying host. No patch, workaround, public proof-of-concept, or exploit code is currently available, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

The vulnerability class is Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command, mapped to CWE-78. In practical terms, this means that some value controllable by an authenticated administrator is passed to an operating system command execution primitive without adequate sanitization or escaping, allowing shell metacharacters or command separators to break out of the intended command and inject additional commands.

The NVD description states the issue affects the SMA1000 appliance and is exploitable "in specific conditions" by "a remote authenticated attacker as administrator." Two properties are important for defenders:

  1. Privilege prerequisite. The attacker must already hold an authenticated administrator session. This is not a pre-authentication or unauthenticated flaw. It therefore raises the post-compromise impact (an already-trusted admin can escalate from appliance management control to host-level OS command execution) rather than providing an initial entry vector. It can also be chained: any separate flaw that grants admin sessions (session hijacking, credential theft, auth bypass) would extend into full host RCE.

  2. Conditional trigger. The phrase "specific conditions" indicates the vulnerable code path is not universally reachable in all configurations or states. The precise triggering condition — which administrative function, request parameter, or configuration state — is not disclosed in the provided data. No function names, parameters, endpoints, or file paths are available in the NVD description, so the following are deliberately not specified here.

The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H reflects:

  • AV:L (Local) — the scoring assumes the attacker has local/adjacent or authenticated access to the vulnerable component, consistent with the admin-session prerequisite.
  • PR:L (Low privileges required) — a low-privileged authenticated context is sufficient per the score, though the CNA title text emphasizes administrator. Note the discrepancy: the description says "as administrator," while the vector indicates only low privileges. This is a meaningful gap and should be treated as uncertain; the effective privilege requirement may be lower than "administrator" in some conditions.
  • UI:N (No user interaction) — no victim action required beyond the attacker's authenticated session.
  • S:U (Unchanged) — scope is unchanged; the vulnerable component and impacted component are the same security authority.
  • C:H/I:H/A:H — full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected host.

Because output from the injected command is not described, exploitation may be noisy (interactive command execution with observable output) or quiet (command executed for side effects such as writing a file, modifying persistence, or pivoting). No public PoC exists; the attack mechanics below are inferred strictly from the vulnerability class.

Exploitation Scenarios

No public PoC is available. The following chain is described at the vulnerability-class level only; no specific function names, parameters, or paths are asserted because none are provided in the source data.

  1. Reconnaissance / target identification. An attacker identifies internet-exposed SonicWall SMA1000 appliances, typically using Shodan or similar scanning for the product banner, login page, or TLS certificate subject. The attacker must obtain or already possess a valid administrator session on the target appliance. Target selection focuses on SMA1000 deployments that are reachable and where the admin plane is exposed, since the flaw requires an authenticated admin context.

  2. Triggering the flaw class. With an authenticated administrator session, the attacker identifies an administrative function or configuration input that flows into an OS command execution primitive. The "specific conditions" qualifier suggests this may require a particular appliance state, configuration, or feature to be enabled. The attacker supplies input containing shell metacharacters or command separators (e.g., characters that terminate the intended command and start a new one) such that the appliance concatenates the attacker-controlled value into a command string and executes it via a shell.

  3. Payload / execution method (class level). The payload is an OS command string that survives into the executed command. Typical class-level payload construction uses command chaining/separator characters to append a second command, or command substitution to embed the output of an attacker command. Because no function or parameter names are disclosed, no concrete payload syntax is asserted here. Execution occurs in the security context of the appliance process that performs the command invocation.

  4. Post-exploitation impact. Successful injection yields arbitrary OS command execution on the SMA1000 host. Given CVSS C:H/I:H/A:H, the attacker can read sensitive configuration and credential material, modify appliance configuration and binaries, and disrupt or disable the appliance. From a network-security-appliance foothold, this commonly enables lateral movement into the protected internal network, persistence via cron/systemd or appliance startup scripts, and potential exfiltration of VPN/access credentials. The blast radius extends from the appliance itself to any network segments it mediates.

Impact Assessment

  • Confidentiality (High): Arbitrary OS command execution allows reading of files, configuration, secrets, and credential material on the appliance.
  • Integrity (High): The attacker can modify configuration, files, and potentially binaries, undermining the trustworthiness of the appliance's security functions.
  • Availability (High): Commands can crash services, alter networking, or otherwise render the appliance unavailable.
  • Scope (Unchanged): The vulnerable component and impacted component share the same security authority per the vector.
  • Attack vector (Local) with no user interaction: Reachability is gated by the authentication/access context; the admin-session prerequisite limits mass-exploitation risk relative to an unauthenticated RCE, but concentrates risk among organizations with compromised or exposed admin credentials.
  • Business impact: SMA1000 appliances typically sit at the network edge and mediate remote access. Compromise can expose internal networks, provide a durable foothold, and require costly incident response, appliance rebuild, and credential rotation across the enterprise.
  • Exploitability today: No public PoC, no Nuclei template, no known exploit code, EPSS not yet scored, and not in CISA KEV. Current real-world exploitation likelihood is therefore assessed as low, but the impact if achieved is severe, and the absence of a patch elevates residual risk.

Detection Guidance

Sigma Rule

title: Suspicious OS Command Execution via SonicWall SMA1000 Administrative Interface
id: 8f2c9d41-7b3e-4a6d-9c1f-2e5a6b0d1c33
status: experimental
description: Detects shell metacharacter abuse consistent with OS command injection (CWE-78) on SonicWall SMA1000 appliance administrative activity.
author: valtersit.com
date: 2026/01/01
logsource:
  category: process_creation
  product: linux
detection:
  selection_shell:
    Image|endswith:
      - '/sh'
      - '/bash'
      - '/dash'
  selection_metachars:
    CommandLine|contains:
      - ';'
      - '&&'
      - '||'
      - '`'
      - '$('
      - '|'
  selection_parent:
    ParentImage|contains:
      - 'sma'
      - 'SMA'
  condition: selection_shell and selection_metachars and selection_parent
falsepositives:
  - Legitimate administrative scripts using shell pipelines
level: high
tags:
  - attack.execution
  - attack.t1059.004
  - cve.2026.102256

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_102256_OS_Command_Injection_SMA1000
{
    meta:
        description = "Heuristic detection of shell metacharacter abuse consistent with CWE-78 OS command injection against SonicWall SMA1000."
        author = "valtersit.com"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        reference = "CVE-2026-102256"
        severity = "high"
    strings:
        $m1 = ";" ascii
        $m2 = "&&" ascii
        $m3 = "||" ascii
        $m4 = "$(" ascii
        $m5 = "`" ascii
        $sma1 = "SMA1000" ascii nocase
        $sma2 = "SMA 1000" ascii nocase
    condition:
        uint16(0) == 0x5A4D or uint32(0) == 0x464C457F or true
        and 1 of ($sma1, $sma2)
        and 2 of ($m*)
}

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-102256 SonicWall SMA1000 Possible OS Command Injection Attempt"; flow:established,to_server; http.method; content:"POST"; http.uri; content:"/"; http.request_body; content:";"; http.request_body; content:"$(|60|"; http.request_body; content:"&&"; threshold: type both, track by_src, count 5, seconds 60; classtype:web-application-attack; reference:cve,2026-102256; sid:2026102256; rev:1;)

Elastic Detection

sequence by host.name with maxspan=5s
  [process where event.type == "start" and process.parent.name in ("sma", "SMA") and process.name in ("sh", "bash", "dash")]
  [process where event.type == "start" and process.args : ("*;*", "*&&*", "*||*", "*$(*", "*`*")]

Splunk SPL Query

index=endpoint OR index=linux
(process_name=sh OR process_name=bash OR process_name=dash)
(parent_process_name="*sma*" OR parent_process_name="*SMA*")
(process_command_line="*;*" OR process_command_line="*&&*" OR process_command_line="*||*" OR process_command_line="*$(*" OR process_command_line="*`*")
| stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen by host, user, parent_process_name, process_name, process_command_line
| where count > 0
| sort - count

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="sonicwall,sma1000,cve_2026_102256,">
  <rule id="1022560" level="12">
    <if_sid>550</if_sid>
    <field name="parent_process">sma</field>
    <match>sh|bash|dash</match>
    <description>CVE-2026-102256: Possible OS command injection via SMA1000 administrative process.</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1059.004</id>
    </mitre>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch confidence: 0/4 (UNPATCHED — no patch evidence from any tracked source).

  1. Immediate mitigations

    • Restrict and audit access to the SMA1000 administrative interface: place management access behind a management network or jump host, and never expose the admin plane directly to the internet.
    • Enforce strong, unique administrator credentials and phishing-resistant MFA where supported; rotate all administrator credentials and any service accounts used by the appliance.
    • Apply least privilege: reduce the number of accounts with administrator access and monitor for anomalous admin-session activity.
    • Monitor for post-authentication spikes in shell/child process creation on the appliance and for shell metacharacter patterns in administrative input.
    • Maintain current offline backups of appliance configuration to enable rapid restore if integrity cannot be trusted.
  2. Patch/upgrade steps

    • No vendor fix is currently recorded in tracked sources. Continuously monitor the SonicWall security advisory and PSIRT channels for a firmware release addressing this CVE.
    • When a fixed SMA1000 firmware is published, validate it against the CNA advisory, test in a lab, and schedule an out-of-band maintenance window to upgrade. Because the issue is UNPATCHED, treat any "fix" claim as unverified until the vendor confirms it.
  3. Long-term hardening

    • Adopt an asset inventory and firmware-vulnerability management program specifically for edge appliances (SMA1000 and comparable remote-access devices).
    • Segment appliance management and data planes; apply network controls so a compromised appliance cannot freely reach all internal segments.
    • Deploy egress monitoring on appliance hosts to detect injected command execution and outbound command-and-control.
    • Retain and review audit logs from the appliance's administrative interface with sufficient process-level telemetry to reconstruct command execution.
    • Re-evaluate privilege requirements: the CVSS vector indicates PR:L while the description emphasizes administrator, so treat the privilege threshold as uncertain and assume lower-privileged admin roles may also be sufficient under "specific conditions."

References

Note: No threat actor campaigns or exploit-in-the-wild evidence are associated with CVE-2026-102256 at the time of writing. No public PoC, Nuclei template, or exploit code is available, and EPSS has not yet been scored.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

product:"SonicWall"
title:"SonicWall"
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-102256/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.