CVE-2026-109753
Executive Summary
CVE-2026-109753 is a memory-corruption vulnerability stemming from incorrect boundary conditions in Firefox's Layout component. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to read or write outside the bounds of a buffer during page layout processing, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or a crash. The flaw is fixed in Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 115.43, and Firefox ESR 153.5, and affects all prior versions of those channels.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability resides in the Layout component of Mozilla Firefox, which handles the CSS box model, reflow, and positioning of rendered page elements. The NVD description states the root cause is "incorrect boundary conditions," a class of defect that typically manifests when a size, index, or offset value is validated against the wrong limit (e.g., < versus <=, off-by-one, or missing lower/upper clamp). In layout code, such a defect can cause a computation to exceed an allocated buffer or an array index to fall outside its valid range when processing attacker-influenced content.
The precise code path, affected structure, and exact boundary expression are not disclosed in the provided data. What can be stated with confidence is the vulnerability class: an out-of-bounds access triggered during layout, which is driven by how a document is structured and styled. This places the attack surface squarely on the rendering engine and the untrusted content it parses.
Given the Layout component's position in the browser pipeline, triggering requires the victim to load a crafted document (web page, HTML email rendered in Firefox, or similar content) that causes the layout engine to compute an out-of-range value. The attacker does not require local access, credentials, or prior code execution. The CNA/NVD data does not specify whether the defect is a read or write primitive, the affected data structure, or the exact dimensional property involved; those details should be treated as unknown pending a Mozilla advisory or patch diff.
Exploitation Scenarios
Note: No public PoC, exploit code, or Nuclei template is available. The following chain is inferred strictly from the vulnerability class (out-of-bounds access via incorrect boundary conditions in layout) and the data provided.
Reconnaissance / target identification The attacker identifies Firefox users as the target population. This is passive: any user running a version below Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 115.43, or Firefox ESR 153.5 is potentially affected, regardless of operating system or network position. No scanning of a server-side service is required because the flaw is client-side; the attacker instead prepares a delivery vector (a malicious or compromised web page, advertisement, or document).
Triggering the flaw class The attacker crafts content designed to exercise the broken boundary condition in layout. Because the exact code path is undisclosed, the specific dimensions/structure that push the computation out of range are not publicly known. At the class level, the attacker supplies malformed or extreme layout input (for example, adversarial sizing or nesting) that causes the layout routine to compute a value outside the permitted bound rather than rejecting or clamping it.
Payload / execution method At the vulnerability-class level, an out-of-bounds access can be leveraged in two ways: (a) as a crash primitive, producing a denial of service and potentially a use-after-free prerequisite for chained exploitation, or (b) as a memory-corruption primitive that, combined with additional techniques (heap grooming, information leak, and control-flow manipulation), can lead to arbitrary code execution within the browser's security context. The provided data does not confirm which memory-safety outcome is achievable, so neither RCE nor crash-only should be asserted as fact. The attacker's payload is delivered simply by getting the victim to render the crafted content in an affected Firefox build.
Post-exploitation impact If the out-of-bounds access is weaponizable into code execution, impact is bounded by Firefox's sandbox and content-process privilege model; full compromise typically requires a separate sandbox escape. Absent a working exploit chain, the most directly demonstrable impact is process crash and potential data exposure from out-of-bounds reads. No in-the-wild exploitation has been reported in the supplied data.
Impact Assessment
Business impact centers on the corporate endpoint: Firefox is widely deployed on developer and knowledge-worker desktops, and a rendering-engine memory-corruption flaw is reachable through ordinary browsing, exposing users to drive-by attack via a single malicious page. The blast radius is the full installed base of affected Firefox and Firefox ESR builds.
Impact subscores cannot be derived from an official score because CVSS is not provided (N/A). The vector above is a class-consistent assessment (network reachable, no privileges, user interaction required for content rendering, high confidentiality and integrity impact if code execution is achieved), not a vendor-confirmed rating. CISA KEV status is NO and there is no evidence of active exploitation, which currently limits urgency compared with an actively exploited zero-day—but a client-side memory-safety flaw in a mainstream browser should be prioritized for patching. ESR channels matter most for enterprises, since ESR 115.x and ESR 153.x are the long-support branches pinned in many managed environments.
Detection Guidance
Sigma Rule
title: Possible Firefox Layout Out-of-Bounds Exploitation Attempt (CVE-2026-109753)
id: 8f2c1a44-6d7b-4e2a-9c11-firefoxLayoutOOB
status: experimental
description: Detects Firefox process crashes consistent with memory corruption in the Layout component
references:
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-109753
author: threat-intel
date: 2026/01/01
logsource:
category: process_creation
product: windows
detection:
selection_img:
Image|endswith:
- '\firefox.exe'
selection_crash:
CommandLine|contains:
- 'crashreporter'
- 'MOZ_CRASHREPORTER'
condition: selection_img and selection_crash
fields:
- Image
- CommandLine
- User
falsepositives:
- Legitimate Firefox crash reporting
level: low
tags:
- attack.t1190
- cve.2026-109753
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2026_109753_Firefox_Layout_OOB
{
meta:
description = "Heuristic detection of Firefox Layout out-of-bounds exploitation artifacts (CVE-2026-109753)"
author = "threat-intel"
date = "2026-01-01"
reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-109753"
severity = "medium"
strings:
$mz = { 4D 5A }
$layout = "Layout" ascii wide nocase
$moz = "MOZ_CRASH" ascii wide
condition:
$mz at 0 and filesize < 50MB and any of ($layout, $moz)
}
Suricata IDS Rule
alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-109753 Possible Firefox Layout Exploit Delivery"; flow:established,to_client; content:"Content-Type"; http_header; content:"text/html"; http_header; pcre:"/(iframe|canvas|svg)/i"; threshold:type limit, track by_src, count 1, seconds 60; classtype:attempted-user; sid:2026109753; rev:1;)
Elastic Detection
process where process.name == "firefox.exe" and
process.command_line : ("*crashreporter*" or "*MOZ_CRASHREPORTER*")
Splunk SPL Query
index=endpoint (Image="*firefox.exe" OR process_name="firefox")
(CommandLine="*crashreporter*" OR CommandLine="*MOZ_CRASHREPORTER*")
| stats count by host, user, CommandLine
| where count > 0
Wazuh OSSEC Rule
<group name="firefox,cve-2026-109753,">
<rule id="109753" level="6">
<decoded_as>json</decoded_as>
<field name="win.eventdata.image">\.exe$</field>
<match>firefox.exe</match>
<regex>crashreporter|MOZ_CRASHREPORTER</regex>
<description>Possible Firefox Layout memory corruption attempt (CVE-2026-109753)</description>
<mitre>
<id>T1190</id>
</mitre>
</rule>
</group>
Mitigation & Patch Guidance
Patch confidence: 0/4 (UNPATCHED — no patch evidence from any tracked source).
- Immediate mitigations
- Because the flaw is fixed in released builds according to the NVD description, treat update availability as the primary control where feasible: move users to Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 115.43, or Firefox ESR 153.5. (Note: no tracked patch source confirmed the fix in this dataset; validate against Mozilla's official release channels before relying on it.)
- Until upgraded, reduce exposure: enforce strict content blocking and a hardened enterprise policy, disable unnecessary plugins, and restrict browsing of untrusted content where operationally possible.
- Monitor for Firefox crash reports on endpoints as a signal of attempted triggering.
- Patch / upgrade steps
- Inventory all Firefox installs across desktop and managed endpoints, separating rapid-release from ESR branches.
- Upgrade rapid-release clients to 158 or later; upgrade ESR 115.x clients to 115.43 or later; upgrade ESR 153.x clients to 153.5 or later.
- Enforce updates via enterprise policy (e.g., auto-update and version pinning controls) and verify version post-deployment.
- Long-term hardening
- Maintain a browser patch SLA (e.g., 7 days for critical client-side memory-safety fixes).
- Adopt exploit mitigations already present in modern browsers (site isolation, content-process sandboxing) and keep them enabled.
- Deploy endpoint detection tuned to browser crash telemetry and anomalous process behavior.
- Track Mozilla advisories continuously, since layout-component fixes often ship quietly alongside unrelated features.
References
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-109753
- Mozilla Security Advisories: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/
- Mozilla Firefox Release Notes: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/
- CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog (currently does NOT list this CVE): https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog No public PoC, exploit code, or evidence of in-the-wild campaigns or threat-actor attribution was available at the time of writing.
What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.