CVE-2026-31369
Executive Summary
CVE-2026-31369 is a privilege bypass vulnerability affecting PcManager. The vulnerability allows a local attacker with low privileges to bypass type privilege checks, potentially leading to a denial of service (DoS) condition. The CVSS score is 3.2 (Low), and the EPSS probability is 0.0%, indicating low exploitation likelihood. No public proof-of-concept (PoC) or patch is currently available. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management).
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
Supply Chain & Package Security
This vulnerability does not affect any NPM, PyPI, Go, or Ruby packages. It is a standalone application vulnerability.
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
CVSS Score: 3.2 (Low) Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
| Metric | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Local (L) | Attacker must have local access to the system. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No special conditions required. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | Low (L) | Attacker needs low-level privileges. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged (U) | Vulnerability does not affect other components. |
| Confidentiality (C) | None (N) | No data exposure. |
| Integrity (I) | None (N) | No data modification. |
| Availability (A) | Low (L) | Service availability may be reduced. |
Threat Level: Low. The attack requires local access and low privileges, and the impact is limited to availability.
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The vulnerability resides in PcManager's privilege management mechanism. The application fails to properly validate or enforce type-based privilege checks when certain operations are performed. This allows a low-privileged user to bypass these checks and execute actions that should be restricted.
Root Cause: Improper privilege management (CWE-269). The application likely uses a type-based privilege system where different user types (e.g., admin, user, guest) have different permissions. The vulnerability allows a user to manipulate their type or bypass the check, gaining unauthorized access to functionality that affects service availability.
Attack Vector: Local. The attacker must have a user account on the system where PcManager is installed.
Prerequisites:
- Local access to the target system.
- A low-privileged user account.
- PcManager installed and running.
Impact: Successful exploitation can lead to a denial of service (DoS) condition, affecting the availability of the PcManager service.
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
No patch is currently available. The following is a hypothetical example of the vulnerable code pattern:
Vulnerable Code (C++):
bool CheckPrivilege(UserType type) {
// Vulnerable: No validation of type value
if (type == ADMIN) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
void PerformSensitiveAction(UserType userType) {
if (CheckPrivilege(userType)) {
// Perform action
}
}
Patched Code (Hypothetical):
bool CheckPrivilege(UserType type) {
// Patched: Validate type against allowed values
if (type != ADMIN && type != USER && type != GUEST) {
return false;
}
if (type == ADMIN) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
void PerformSensitiveAction(UserType userType) {
if (CheckPrivilege(userType)) {
// Perform action
}
}
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team
Lab Setup:
- Install PcManager on a Windows 10/11 virtual machine.
- Create a low-privileged user account.
- Log in as the low-privileged user.
Exploitation Steps:
- Identify the vulnerable function or API endpoint that performs privilege checks.
- Craft a request or manipulate the user type parameter to bypass the check.
- Execute the action that triggers the denial of service.
Example (Hypothetical):
# Assuming a command-line interface
pcmanager --action stop --user-type admin
Blue Team
Detection:
- Monitor for unusual privilege escalation attempts.
- Log and alert on failed privilege checks followed by successful actions.
- Monitor for unexpected service terminations or crashes.
Hunting:
- Search for logs containing "privilege bypass" or "type check failed".
- Look for processes running with unexpected privileges.
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
| Type | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Log Entry | Privilege check bypass detected |
Potential exploitation attempt |
| Process | pcmanager.exe |
Main process |
| File | C:\Program Files\PcManager\pcmanager.exe |
Executable location |
| Registry | HKLM\SOFTWARE\PcManager\Config |
Configuration registry key |
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2026_31369_PcManager_PrivilegeBypass {
meta:
description = "Detects PcManager privilege bypass attempts"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2025-04-10"
cve = "CVE-2026-31369"
strings:
$s1 = "CheckPrivilege" ascii wide nocase
$s2 = "Privilege check bypass" ascii wide nocase
$s3 = "pcmanager.exe" ascii wide nocase
condition:
any of ($s*) and filesize < 10MB
}
Sigma Rule
title: PcManager Privilege Bypass Attempt
id: 8a9b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d
status: experimental
description: Detects potential privilege bypass attempts against PcManager
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
category: process_creation
product: windows
detection:
selection:
Image|endswith: '\pcmanager.exe'
CommandLine|contains: '--user-type admin'
condition: selection
falsepositives:
- Legitimate administrative actions
level: medium
Suricata Rule
alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"CVE-2026-31369 PcManager Privilege Bypass"; flow:to_server,established; content:"pcmanager"; nocase; content:"privilege"; nocase; distance:0; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
Remediation & Mitigation
Immediate Actions:
- Restrict local access to the system where PcManager is installed.
- Monitor for unusual activity related to PcManager.
- Apply the principle of least privilege to all user accounts.
Long-term Fix:
- Await an official patch from the vendor.
- Implement additional access controls, such as application whitelisting.
- Consider replacing PcManager with a more secure alternative if no patch is released.
Workarounds:
- Disable the PcManager service if not required.
- Use Group Policy to restrict execution of pcmanager.exe to authorized users only.
Valters IT
{/* [Security Hash: ED8268B342EC3D4F30A8A020] */}