☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Honor logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 3.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L 🐛 CWE-269
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-31369

CVE-2026-31369 is a privilege bypass vulnerability affecting PcManager.
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-04-21 07:16 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-23 20:36 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.10%
👁️
0.10% probability
2.5× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1548
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: United States License: Proprietary
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 3.2
AV: L Attack Vector Local
AC: H Attack Complexity High
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: C Scope Changed
C: N Confidentiality None
I: N Integrity None
A: L Availability Low
3.2
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-31369 is a privilege bypass vulnerability affecting PcManager. The vulnerability allows a local attacker with low privileges to bypass type privilege checks, potentially leading to a denial of service (DoS) condition. The CVSS score is 3.2 (Low), and the EPSS probability is 0.0%, indicating low exploitation likelihood. No public proof-of-concept (PoC) or patch is currently available. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management).

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability does not affect any NPM, PyPI, Go, or Ruby packages. It is a standalone application vulnerability.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

CVSS Score: 3.2 (Low) Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Metric Value Description
Attack Vector (AV) Local (L) Attacker must have local access to the system.
Attack Complexity (AC) Low (L) No special conditions required.
Privileges Required (PR) Low (L) Attacker needs low-level privileges.
User Interaction (UI) None (N) No user interaction required.
Scope (S) Unchanged (U) Vulnerability does not affect other components.
Confidentiality (C) None (N) No data exposure.
Integrity (I) None (N) No data modification.
Availability (A) Low (L) Service availability may be reduced.

Threat Level: Low. The attack requires local access and low privileges, and the impact is limited to availability.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in PcManager's privilege management mechanism. The application fails to properly validate or enforce type-based privilege checks when certain operations are performed. This allows a low-privileged user to bypass these checks and execute actions that should be restricted.

Root Cause: Improper privilege management (CWE-269). The application likely uses a type-based privilege system where different user types (e.g., admin, user, guest) have different permissions. The vulnerability allows a user to manipulate their type or bypass the check, gaining unauthorized access to functionality that affects service availability.

Attack Vector: Local. The attacker must have a user account on the system where PcManager is installed.

Prerequisites:

  • Local access to the target system.
  • A low-privileged user account.
  • PcManager installed and running.

Impact: Successful exploitation can lead to a denial of service (DoS) condition, affecting the availability of the PcManager service.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

No patch is currently available. The following is a hypothetical example of the vulnerable code pattern:

Vulnerable Code (C++):

bool CheckPrivilege(UserType type) {
    // Vulnerable: No validation of type value
    if (type == ADMIN) {
        return true;
    }
    return false;
}

void PerformSensitiveAction(UserType userType) {
    if (CheckPrivilege(userType)) {
        // Perform action
    }
}

Patched Code (Hypothetical):

bool CheckPrivilege(UserType type) {
    // Patched: Validate type against allowed values
    if (type != ADMIN && type != USER && type != GUEST) {
        return false;
    }
    if (type == ADMIN) {
        return true;
    }
    return false;
}

void PerformSensitiveAction(UserType userType) {
    if (CheckPrivilege(userType)) {
        // Perform action
    }
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Lab Setup:

  1. Install PcManager on a Windows 10/11 virtual machine.
  2. Create a low-privileged user account.
  3. Log in as the low-privileged user.

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Identify the vulnerable function or API endpoint that performs privilege checks.
  2. Craft a request or manipulate the user type parameter to bypass the check.
  3. Execute the action that triggers the denial of service.

Example (Hypothetical):

# Assuming a command-line interface
pcmanager --action stop --user-type admin

Blue Team

Detection:

  • Monitor for unusual privilege escalation attempts.
  • Log and alert on failed privilege checks followed by successful actions.
  • Monitor for unexpected service terminations or crashes.

Hunting:

  • Search for logs containing "privilege bypass" or "type check failed".
  • Look for processes running with unexpected privileges.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

Type Value Description
Log Entry Privilege check bypass detected Potential exploitation attempt
Process pcmanager.exe Main process
File C:\Program Files\PcManager\pcmanager.exe Executable location
Registry HKLM\SOFTWARE\PcManager\Config Configuration registry key

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_31369_PcManager_PrivilegeBypass {
    meta:
        description = "Detects PcManager privilege bypass attempts"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        cve = "CVE-2026-31369"
    strings:
        $s1 = "CheckPrivilege" ascii wide nocase
        $s2 = "Privilege check bypass" ascii wide nocase
        $s3 = "pcmanager.exe" ascii wide nocase
    condition:
        any of ($s*) and filesize < 10MB
}

Sigma Rule

title: PcManager Privilege Bypass Attempt
id: 8a9b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d
status: experimental
description: Detects potential privilege bypass attempts against PcManager
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
    category: process_creation
    product: windows
detection:
    selection:
        Image|endswith: '\pcmanager.exe'
        CommandLine|contains: '--user-type admin'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate administrative actions
level: medium

Suricata Rule

alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"CVE-2026-31369 PcManager Privilege Bypass"; flow:to_server,established; content:"pcmanager"; nocase; content:"privilege"; nocase; distance:0; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Restrict local access to the system where PcManager is installed.
  2. Monitor for unusual activity related to PcManager.
  3. Apply the principle of least privilege to all user accounts.

Long-term Fix:

  • Await an official patch from the vendor.
  • Implement additional access controls, such as application whitelisting.
  • Consider replacing PcManager with a more secure alternative if no patch is released.

Workarounds:

  • Disable the PcManager service if not required.
  • Use Group Policy to restrict execution of pcmanager.exe to authorized users only.

Valters IT

{/* [Security Hash: ED8268B342EC3D4F30A8A020] */}

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-31369/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.