☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Hcltech logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 5.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N 🐛 CWE-15
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-56567

CVE-2026-56567 Privilege Escalation in Hcl
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-07-31 16:17 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-26 06:20 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.10%
👁️
0.10% probability
2.5× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
Country: India License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 5.1
AV: L Attack Vector Local
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: L Confidentiality Low
I: L Integrity Low
A: N Availability None
5.1
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

HCL iControl v4.3.0 contains a Security Misconfiguration vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive internal configuration files exposed through the web application. Due to improper web server and application hardening, files such as database credentials, secret keys, internal paths, and application architecture details are retrievable from public web endpoints. The vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 5.1 (Medium) and, at the time of this report, no formal patch or vendor advisory has been released. Attackers can leverage the exposed data for lateral movement, privilege escalation, or further targeted attacks. While exploitation is low-complexity, the actual impact depends on the sensitivity of the leaked configuration files.

This is not a WordPress-specific or PHP-framework issue; it is an application-level misconfiguration affecting the HCL iControl management interface.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

The official NVD vector is UNKNOWN, but the CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.1 strongly suggests the following characteristics:

  • Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
  • User Interaction (UI): None (N)
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
  • Confidentiality Impact (C): High (H)
  • Integrity Impact (I): None (N)
  • Availability Impact (A): None (N)

A representative vector matching this profile is:

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (score 5.3, but a 5.1 can be achieved with slightly lowered impact, e.g., C:L).

Threat Level: Medium — Unauthenticated information disclosure is an attractive entry point for attackers performing reconnaissance. Although it does not lead directly to RCE, the leaked configuration often provides the keys to the kingdom.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

HCL iControl v4.3.0 likely ships with a default web server configuration that:

  • Serves static files from application directories without restricting access to /WEB-INF, /conf, /config, /properties, or /logs.
  • Has directory listing enabled.
  • Lack of .htaccess / web server location-based access controls.
  • Does not strip sensitive files from deployment artifacts.
  • Uses overly permissive "Allow from all" rules inherited from installation examples.

An attacker can directly request known internal paths and retrieve files such as:

  • application.properties
  • application.yml
  • datasource.xml
  • context.xml
  • db-config.properties
  • hibernate.cfg.xml
  • server.xml
  • admin_credentials.properties
  • /backup/*.properties

Because the files are served by the same web server handling legitimate UI requests, the origin appears trustworthy to any filtering that only sees HTTP 200 responses.

Further attack chains include:

  • Exposing JDBC URLs and DBA credentials → direct database connection.
  • Exposure of SMTP / LDAP credentials → phishing or directory harvesting.
  • Leaked private HMAC keys or JWT secrets → session forgery.
  • Internal IP ranges, hostnames, and OS user accounts → mapping the network.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since there is no official patch available, the following contrast shows the vulnerable configuration versus a hardened, recommended configuration for the application's web container.

Vulnerable (default)

In a typical web server setup, the entire deployment directory is exposed:

# Vulnerable: application context root explicitly serves config folders
server.documentRoot = /opt/iControl/htdocs
server.allowLinking = true

Or in reverse-proxy / Apache-style:

<VirtualHost *:443>
    ServerName icontrol.example.com
    DocumentRoot /opt/iControl/webroot
    DirectoryIndex index.html
</VirtualHost>

With no deny clauses for /config, /WEB-INF, or /backup, any HTTP GET to /config/application.properties returns content.

Patched / Recommended (when vendor fixes)

A secure configuration denies all direct access to sensitive directories and only allows application-internal request forwarding:

<VirtualHost *:443>
    ServerName icontrol.example.com
    DocumentRoot /opt/iControl/webroot
    DirectoryIndex index.html

    # Block sensitive directories from any external access
    <DirectoryMatch "^/.*/(config|WEB-INF|META-INF|backup)/">
        Require all denied
    </DirectoryMatch>

    <FilesMatch "\.(properties|xml|yml|yaml|ini|conf|config|json)$">
        Require all denied
    </FilesMatch>
</VirtualHost>

In nginx, a proper location rule would be:

location ~* ^/(config|WEB-INF|backup|logs|etc)/ { deny all; return 404; }
location ~* \.(properties|log|ini|conf)$ { deny all; return 404; }

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team

Objective: Demonstrate unauthenticated leakage of sensitive configuration files.

  1. Recon: Enumerate the target and determine if the iControl login page is present:

    curl -I https://target/
    
  2. Directory enumeration with common config paths:

    ffuf -w wordlist.txt -u https://target/FUZZ -mc 200 -c -v
    

    Example wordlist entries:

    config/application.properties
    config/db.yml
    WEB-INF/classes/application.properties
    backup/webconfig.xml
    logs/iControl.log
    
  3. Manual verification:

    curl -s https://target/config/application.properties
    curl -s https://target/WEB-INF/classes/application.yml
    curl -s https://target/backup/datasource.xml
    
  4. Inspect leaked contents for secrets:

    curl -s https://target/config/application.properties | grep -E "(password|jdbc|secret|token)"
    
  5. Expand impact — use leaked JDBC URL / credentials to connect to a database:

    mysql -h internal-db -u admin -p -e "show databases;"
    

Blue Team

  1. Replicate the attack in a staging environment to confirm exposure.

    curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" https://target/config/application.properties
    
  2. Check for residual logs — ensure that 200 responses for such paths are flagged.

  3. Harden immediately:

    • Apply web server ACLs blocking */config/*, */WEB-INF/*, */backup/*.
    • Remove all configuration files from web-accessible directories.
    • Implement a WAF rule to block requests containing known sensitive filenames.
    • Enforce X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff and unexpected response monitoring.
  4. Rotate credentials — if the exposure is confirmed in production, rotate all keys and passwords that appeared in the exposed files.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • HTTP GET requests to:
    • /config/application.properties
    • /config/application.yml
    • /WEB-INF/classes/application.properties
    • /backup/datasource.xml
    • /logs/iControl.log
    • /manager/conf/server.xml
  • Responses with HTTP/1.1 200 OK and text/plain or application/xml containing keywords such as password:, jdbc:mysql, secret-key=, privateKey=.
  • Repeated pattern of directory traversal enumeration using common config wordlists.
  • Presence of encoded strings in application-... files matching base64 or hex patterns:
    cGFzc3dvcmQ9   # base64 for password=
    

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

Detects sensitive HCL iControl configuration file content that may have been downloaded to a host or stored as an artifact.

rule HCL_iControl_Config_Exfil {
    meta:
        author = "Valters IT"
        description = "Detects content of exposed HCL iControl configuration files"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        severity = "medium"
    strings:
        $a = "jdbc:mysql"
        $b = "datasource"
        $c = "application.properties"
        $d = "hibernate.connection.password"
        $e = "secret.key"
        $f = "iControl"
    condition:
        (2 of ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e,$f)) and
        filesize < 1MB
}

Sigma Rule

Detects the HTTP access pattern associated with attempts to fetch internal configuration files.

title: HCL iControl Internal Configuration File Access
status: experimental
author: Valters IT
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: apache
    definition: '_sourceCategory=webserver'
detection:
    selection:
        cs-method: GET
        cs-uri-stem:
            - /config/*
            - /WEB-INF/*
            - /backup/*
            - /logs/*
            - /manager/conf/*
        cs-uri-extension:
            - .properties
            - .conf
            - .xml
            - .yml
            - .yaml
            - .ini
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Internal configuration retrieval by authorised operations teams
    - App configuration export utilities
level: medium

Suricata Rule

Detects network-level HTTP requests to sensitive paths on the iControl server.

alert http any any -> $HOME_NET any (
    msg:"HCL iControl Config File Disclosure Attempt";
    flow:to_server,established;
    content:"GET ";
    http_method;
    content:"/config/";
    http_uri;
    content:".properties";
    http_uri;
    sid:2026567;
    rev:1;
    metadata:attack_target_server, deployment_perimeter, tag_exposure, confidence_high, created_at_2026_01_01;
)
alert http any any -> $HOME_NET any (
    msg:"HCL iControl WEB-INF Class Configuration Access";
    flow:to_server,established;
    content:"GET ";
    http_method;
    content:"/WEB-INF/";
    http_uri;
    content:".xml";
    http_uri;
    sid:2026568;
    rev:1;
    metadata:attack_target_server, deployment_perimeter, tag_exposure, confidence_high, created_at_2026_01_01;
)

Remediation & Mitigation

Because no vendor patch exists, immediate mitigation is fully recommended:

  1. Remove sensitive files from the web root — physically relocate configuration files outside of htdocs, webapp, or public_html directories.
  2. Enforce web-server deny rules — block all direct access to /config/*, /WEB-INF/*, /backup/*, and files ending in .properties, .xml, .yml, .ini, .conf.
  3. Disable directory listing on any directory containing application data.
  4. Implement WAF rules — custom rule sets targeting known HCL iControl paths.
  5. Review and rotate all secrets (credentials, API keys, certificates) that may have been exposed via this flaw.
  6. Run a hardened baseline scan — use CIS or vendor hardening guides.
  7. Monitor access logs continuously for repeated pattern hits on sensitive paths.
  8. Contact HCL support and request a patch or official hardening workaround.
  • Checklist for operations:
    • Update firewall/security group rules to restrict admin interface access to bastion hosts.
    • Remove default admin credentials.
    • Apply segmentation between iControl server and backend databases.
    • Add outbound egress controls to limit data-exfil paths (e.g., blocking unexpected SMTP/SSH outbound).

Valters IT — Cyber Security Intelligence Report
Header data collected from CVE/NVD and internal threat analysis. All detection rules are heuristic and should be validated on production traffic before deployment.

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-56567/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.