☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Hpe logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-284
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-73750

CVE-2026-73750 Remote Code Execution in Hpe
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-02 19:25 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: Public
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.80%
👁️
0.80% probability
19.9× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1190
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: USA License: Open Source
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 8.8
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
8.8
THREAT LEVEL
INTEL SOURCES NVD EPSS HOW WE SCORE →
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-73750 is a vulnerability in the authentication module of HPE ArubaOS-CX networking devices that mishandles malformed or truncated input, allowing an authenticated remote attacker to induce a denial-of-service condition or potentially achieve remote code execution with elevated privileges. The flaw is reachable by an authenticated attacker who can present specially crafted input originating from a compromised or hostile authentication server, meaning the trust relationship between the switch/controller and its authentication backend is the primary attack surface. With a CVSS base score of 8.8 (High) and a low EPSS score of ~0.46%, exploitation is currently assessed as targeted rather than opportunistic, but the impact — RCE with elevated privileges — places this among the most consequential classes of network-infrastructure flaws.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

The NVD description states that "vulnerabilities exist in the authentication module that may improperly process malformed or truncated input." The associated CWE is CWE-284 (Improper Access Control), indicating that the flaw ultimately results in a failure to correctly constrain the privileges or processing paths triggered by attacker-supplied authentication data.

The critical nuance is the input source: exploitation requires that the specially crafted input arrive "from a compromised or hostile authentication server." This means the malicious bytes are not necessarily sent directly by the attacker to the vulnerable device's own API; instead, they are carried in the authentication conversation (e.g., responses returned by an external RADIUS, TACACS+, or similar authentication backend) that the ArubaOS-CX device consumes and parses. The "malformed or truncated" phrasing points to inadequate length/format validation — i.e., a parser that trusts its counterpart to return well-formed, correctly sized fields and does not defend against short, partial, or structurally invalid responses. When that assumption is violated, control flow or memory handling in the authentication path can be driven into an unsafe state, producing either a crash (DoS) or memory-corruption primitives that an attacker could leverage for code execution.

Because the attacker must be authenticated (PR:L, CVSS privilege-required) and must control (or have compromised) the authentication server, this is best characterized as an attack on the device's trust in its authentication infrastructure rather than an unauthenticated pre-auth bug. The scope is unchanged (S:U), but confidentiality, integrity, and availability are all rated High — consistent with a flaw that can yield full device compromise or sustained service outage.

The provided data does not disclose specific function names, protocol fields, or file paths within the authentication module. Accordingly, no implementation-level identifiers are asserted here; the analysis remains at the vulnerability-class level (improper input validation in an authentication-response parser leading to DoS/RCE).

Exploitation Scenarios

The attack chain, derived strictly from the NVD description, proceeds as follows:

  1. Reconnaissance / target identification. The attacker identifies an HPE ArubaOS-CX deployment whose authentication path relies on an external authentication server. Because the flaw is triggered by server responses, the attacker's focus is the authentication backend and the trust channel between it and the device — not necessarily the device's own externally exposed management interface.

  2. Positioning. The attacker must satisfy two preconditions stated in the description: they must be an authenticated remote attacker, and they must supply input "from a compromised or hostile authentication server." In practice this means the attacker either compromises the legitimate authentication server, or operates/inserts a hostile server that the target device will consult (for example, via misconfiguration, rogue server insertion, or man-in-the-middle on an unauthenticated transport). No public PoC is confirmed in the provided data; the chain is inferred from the vulnerability class.

  3. Triggering the flaw class. The hostile or compromised server returns a malformed or truncated authentication response. The ArubaOS-CX authentication module "may improperly process" this malformed/truncated input because it lacks adequate validation of the response's structure and length. This is the point at which the improper access-control / input-handling weakness (CWE-284) is exercised.

  4. Impact. Successful exploitation "could result in a Denial-of-Service or potential remote code execution with elevated privileges." A DoS manifests as unavailability of the affected device or its authentication services; an RCE outcome, per the description, occurs at elevated privilege on the device — the most severe outcome for a network switch/controller, potentially enabling further lateral movement or persistent control of the network fabric.

No specific function names, class names, endpoints, parameters, or payloads are provided in the source data; none are invented here. Exploit code was not observed ("Exploit Code: NO"), though PoC status is listed as Public per the provided dataset.

Impact Assessment

CVSS subscores: Base 8.8 (High). Vector AV:N (network-reachable), AC:L (low complexity), PR:L (authenticated attacker required), UI:N (no user interaction), S:U (scope unchanged), C:H/I:H/A:H (high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact).

  • Confidentiality (High): Elevated-privilege code execution on the device could expose configuration, credentials, certificates, and control-plane data.
  • Integrity (High): An attacker with elevated access could alter device configuration, routing/switching behavior, or trust settings — a severe risk for network integrity.
  • Availability (High): The explicitly stated DoS outcome means an attacker can degrade or take down switching/authentication services.
  • Blast radius: ArubaOS-CX devices typically anchor access-layer or aggregation-layer connectivity in enterprise and campus networks. Compromise or outage of such a device can disrupt many downstream users and services, and elevated access may enable movement toward higher-value network segments.
  • Privilege requirement reduces mass-exploitation risk: The PR:L and hostile-auth-server preconditions make remote opportunistic exploitation unlikely, consistent with the low EPSS (~0.46%). Risk is concentrated in environments where authentication infrastructure is internet-adjacent, federated to untrusted parties, or weakly segmented from the management/data plane.

Detection Guidance

Sigma Rule

title: ArubaOS-CX Authentication Module Malformed Input Exploitation (CVE-2026-73750)
id: 8f2c1a40-7b3e-4c9d-9a21-cve202673750
status: experimental
description: Detects signs of malformed or truncated authentication input processing from an external authentication server on HPE ArubaOS-CX devices, potentially leading to DoS or RCE (CVE-2026-73750).
references:
  - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73750
author: Valters IT Threat Intelligence
date: 2026/01/01
logsource:
  product: aruba
  service: arubaos_cx
detection:
  selection_event:
    - message|contains:
        - 'authentication module'
        - 'malformed'
        - 'truncated'
        - 'auth server'
  selection_fault:
    - message|contains:
        - 'authentication failure'
        - 'access violation'
        - 'segfault'
        - 'unexpected response'
  condition: selection_event and selection_fault
fields:
  - src_ip
  - auth_server_ip
  - user
falsepositives:
  - Legitimate misconfigured RADIUS/TACACS+ servers returning truncated responses
level: high
tags:
  - attack.t1190
  - cve.2026.73750

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_73750_ArubaOS_CX_Auth_Malformed
{
    meta:
        description = "Detects malformed/truncated authentication input handling related to CVE-2026-73750 in ArubaOS-CX authentication module"
        author = "Valters IT Threat Intelligence"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73750"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        cve = "CVE-2026-73750"
    strings:
        $a = "authentication module"
        $b = "malformed"
        $c = "truncated"
        $d = "auth server"
    condition:
        uint16(0) == 0x5A4D or filesize < 20MB
        and 2 of ($a, $b, $c, $d)
}

Note: No reliable file/memory artifacts are provided in the source data; this rule matches only the descriptive strings from the NVD entry and should be treated as a placeholder for analyst review, not as a verified detection signature.

Suricata IDS Rule

alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET 1812 (msg:"CVE-2026-73750 ArubaOS-CX Potential Malformed/Truncated RADIUS Authentication Response"; flow:from_server,established; content:"|01|"; depth:0; byte_test:1,<,20,2,relative; classtype:attempted-admin; reference:cve,2026-73750; sid:2026737501; rev:1;)

Note: No protocol-specific fields beyond the generic authentication-server interaction are detailed in the source data. This rule is a heuristic placeholder and requires tuning against the actual deployment protocol (RADIUS/TACACS+).

Elastic Detection

sequence by host.id with maxspan=30s
  [ process where event.type == "start" and process.name : ("aruba*", "auth*") ]
  [ network where event.category == "network" and
      network.direction == "inbound" and
      network.transport == "tcp" and
      process.name : "*auth*" and
      network.bytes < 20 ]

Note: This heuristic flags an authentication process receiving unusually small (truncated) inbound payloads. It must be tuned to the environment; no verified field-level telemetry is published for this CVE.

Splunk SPL Query

index=network sourcetype=arubaos_cx
| search ("authentication module" OR malformed OR truncated OR "auth server" OR "authentication failure")
| stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen by host, src_ip, auth_server_ip
| where count > 3
| sort - count

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="aruba,arubaos_cx,authentication,">
  <rule id="202673750" level="12">
    <decoded_as>json</decoded_as>
    <field name="message">authentication module</field>
    <match>malformed|truncated|auth server|authentication failure</match>
    <description>CVE-2026-73750: Possible malformed/truncated authentication input processing on ArubaOS-CX (potential DoS/RCE)</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1190</id>
    </mitre>
    <group>cve_2026_73750,authentication_failure,</group>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch confidence: 2/4 (CLAIMED — a single source, NVD, claims a patch exists; it is not independently confirmed, and no fixed version string or vendor advisory is provided).

  1. Immediate mitigations

    • Apply the vendor fix as soon as a confirmed ArubaOS-CX patched release is available; consult HPE Aruba Networking security advisories directly to verify the fixed version, since the provided data does not specify it.
    • Harden the authentication trust path: enforce IPsec/RADSEC or otherwise cryptographically protect authentication traffic so a hostile server cannot inject malformed or truncated responses.
    • Replace or re-secure any authentication server that is internet-facing, federated to untrusted parties, or reachable from untrusted network segments.
    • Restrict management-plane and authentication-protocol access (RADIUS/TACACS+) to trusted, monitored hosts via ACLs and network segmentation.
  2. Patch/upgrade steps

    • Monitor the HPE Aruba Networking security advisory portal for ArubaOS-CX and identify the fixed release for your platform and branch.
    • Validate the fixed build in a staging environment before fleet rollout, prioritizing devices that terminate authentication or sit at network aggregation points.
    • After upgrade, re-verify authentication configuration and test against a controlled malformed-response scenario.
  3. Long-term hardening

    • Strengthen input-validation expectations for all responses consumed from external authentication sources; treat authentication backends as untrusted input providers.
    • Implement least-privilege and monitoring for authentication servers to detect compromise early (since attacker compromise of that server is a precondition).
    • Monitor logs for repeated authentication anomalies and integrate the detection rules above into the SOC pipeline.
    • Maintain a current asset inventory with OS versions to rapidly correlate future advisories affecting ArubaOS-CX.

References

  1. NVD — CVE-2026-73750: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73750
  2. CWE-284 — Improper Access Control: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/284.html
  3. MITRE ATT&CK T1190 — Exploit Public-Facing Application: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1190/
  4. HPE Aruba Networking Security Advisories (verify patched ArubaOS-CX release): https://www.arubanetworks.com/support-services/security-bulletins/
  5. FIRST EPSS (CVE-2026-73750 current score): https://www.first.org/epss/

Exploit-in-the-wild / threat actor note: No CISA KEV listing, no confirmed public exploit code, and no threat-actor campaign is associated with CVE-2026-73750 in the provided data. PoC status is listed as "Public" but exploit code is marked "NO"; treat PoC claims as unverified until corroborated. EPSS ~0.46% indicates low near-term exploitation likelihood, but the high impact of a successful chain warrants prioritized patching for authentication-anchoring devices.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

product:

💣 PoC CODE AVAILABLE

Exploit code for this CVE is tracked in our database. Access poc_code via API Pro.

[ API_PRO ] →
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-73750/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.