☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Citrix logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-119
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-88772

CVE-2026-88772 Buffer Overflow in Citrix
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-09-27 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-29 05:00 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
🚨 ACTIVELY EXPLOITED (KEV) 💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🥷 MITRE: T1190
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: USA License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: Netscaler Application Delivery Controller
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 8.1
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: H Attack Complexity High
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
8.1
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-88772 is a memory-safety vulnerability (CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) affecting Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway appliances. Successful exploitation can result in remote code execution (RCE) or denial of service (DoS) against internet-facing appliances running affected firmware versions. Because NetScaler ADC and Gateway are commonly deployed at the network edge as load balancers, SSL VPN concentrators, and authentication gateways, this class of flaw carries high risk of pre-authentication compromise and is listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

The NVD description provides only the affected-product scope and the resulting impact (RCE or DoS), not the precise triggering input. The assigned weakness, CWE-119, describes improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer — i.e., a memory-corruption condition such as an out-of-bounds read/write or buffer overflow. Vulnerabilities in this class arise when a parsing or processing routine acts on attacker-controlled data without adequately validating its length or boundaries relative to the destination buffer.

Affected components are Citrix NetScaler ADC (14.1 branch before 14.1-73.37; 13.1 branch before 13.1-64.23; and the FIPS/NDcPP builds before 14.1-73.37 FIPS and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS) and Citrix NetScaler Gateway (before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23). Both products terminate untrusted network traffic at the edge, so the attack surface is the externally reachable management/data interfaces of the appliance.

Because the disclosure does not name the specific protocol handler, request path, or parameter involved, the exact code-level mechanism cannot be stated without speculation. What can be derived from the data: the flaw is remotely reachable (CVSS:3.1/AV:N), requires no privileges or user interaction (PR:N/UI:N), and yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact under the vector used here — consistent with memory corruption that enables code execution or, at minimum, crashes the service. The co-listing of RCE and DoS as outcomes is typical of a memory-corruption bug where reliable control-flow hijack may not always be achievable but process crash is.

No public proof-of-concept, exploit code, or Nuclei template was identified in the supplied data. No patch-evidence sources were tracked (patch confidence 0/4), so organizations should treat details as developing and validate fixes directly against Citrix's advisory.

Exploitation Scenarios

The following attack chain is described at the vulnerability-class level, since the NVD description does not disclose the specific endpoint, parameter, or code path.

  1. Reconnaissance / target identification: An adversary identifies internet-exposed Citrix NetScaler ADC and/or Gateway appliances using internet-scanning services (e.g., Shodan/Censys queries for Citrix NetScaler products and login titles). Vendors and edge services are enumerated by banner, TLS certificate subject, and HTTP titles. The attacker fingerprints firmware/version where possible to match the affected ranges (ADC < 14.1-73.37 and < 13.1-64.23; Gateway < 14.1-73.37 and < 13.1-64.23).

  2. Triggering the flaw: Because this is a memory-buffer boundary weakness (CWE-119), exploitation begins by sending crafted network input to the reachable interface that reaches the vulnerable parsing/processing routine. The specific malformed request construction is not documented in the available data; the generic mechanism is an input that exceeds or violates an assumed buffer boundary, corrupting adjacent memory. Per the NVD description, exploitation is network-accessible and does not require authentication or user interaction.

  3. Payload / execution (class level): For the RCE outcome, memory corruption that permits control of execution flow can allow the attacker to influence program execution on the appliance. For the DoS outcome, the same corrupted-memory condition can trigger a crash of the affected process or service, taking the gateway/load-balancing function offline. The exact payload mechanics are not specified in the provided description.

  4. Post-exploitation impact: Successful RCE on an edge NetScaler could allow the attacker to operate within the appliance's context, potentially accessing traffic and configuration material handled by the device. DoS results in loss of the edge service, disrupting access to protected applications. No specific post-exploitation tooling or C2 behavior is documented in the supplied data.

Given the CISA KEV listing, exploitation is presumed to occur in the wild, even though no public PoC or exploit code was identified in this dataset.

Impact Assessment

The impact is high across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, consistent with a remote, unauthenticated memory-corruption vulnerability that can yield code execution or service crash. Affected systems are Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway appliances, which are typically internet-facing, high-value edge devices controlling access to internal applications and VPN sessions. Blast radius is significant: compromise of an edge gateway can expose downstream applications, session data, and potentially credentials handled by the device. Availability impact is immediate for the DoS outcome (loss of load balancing / gateway access). Because the flaw is network-reachable with no privileges or user interaction, severity is elevated regardless of the exact CVSS numeric value, which is not provided (CVSS score N/A in the supplied data). The CISA KEV designation further raises urgency due to confirmed real-world exploitation.

Detection Guidance

Sigma Rule

title: Suspected Exploitation Attempt Against Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway (CVE-2026-88772)
id: 7c9f1a2b-3d4e-4f5a-9b6c-88772citrix
status: experimental
description: Detects anomalous or malformed HTTP requests to Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway edge interfaces that may indicate attempts to trigger a memory-buffer vulnerability (CWE-119).
references:
  - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-88772
author: valtersit.com
date: 2026-01-01
logsource:
  category: webserver
  product: citrix
detection:
  selection_methods:
    cs-method:
      - 'POST'
      - 'GET'
  selection_paths:
    cs-uri-stem|contains:
      - '/gwtest'
      - '/vpn/'
      - '/nf/auth'
  filter_normal:
    sc-status:
      - 200
      - 302
      - 401
  condition: selection_methods and selection_paths and not filter_normal
fields:
  - c-ip
  - cs-uri-stem
  - cs-method
  - sc-status
falsepositives:
  - Legitimate administrative or health-check traffic
level: high
tags:
  - attack.t1190
  - cve.2026-88772

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_88772_Citrix_NetScaler_MemoryCorruption
{
    meta:
        description = "Heuristic detection for exploitation artifacts targeting Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway memory-buffer flaw (CVE-2026-88772)"
        author = "valtersit.com"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-88772"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        severity = "high"

    strings:
        $cve = "CVE-2026-88772" ascii wide nocase
        $prod1 = "NetScaler ADC" ascii wide nocase
        $prod2 = "NetScaler Gateway" ascii wide nocase
        $ns = "ns.conf" ascii wide
        $citrix = "citrix" ascii wide nocase

    condition:
        uint32(0) == 0x464C457F or  // ELF (appliance binaries)
        $cve or
        (2 of ($prod1, $prod2, $ns, $citrix))
}

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-88772 Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway Potential Memory Corruption Exploit Attempt"; flow:established,to_server; http.method; content:"GET"; http.uri; content:"/vpn/"; nocase; http.header; content:"|0d 0a|"; pcre:"/(?i)(netscaler|citrix)/"; threshold: type both, track by_src, count 20, seconds 60; classtype:attempted-admin; reference:cve,2026-88772; reference:url,nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-88772; sid:202688772; rev:1;)

Elastic Detection

sequence by source.ip with maxspan=1m
  [ network where network.protocol == "http" and
      url.path : ("/vpn/*", "/gwtest*", "/nf/auth*") and
      http.request.method in ("GET", "POST") ]
  [ network where network.protocol == "http" and
      http.response.status_code in (500, 502, 503, 400) ]

Splunk SPL Query

index=web OR index=proxy sourcetype=access_combined OR sourcetype=citrix:netscaler
| search (uri_path="/vpn/*" OR uri_path="/gwtest*" OR uri_path="/nf/auth*")
| eval suspicious=if(status IN (400,500,502,503), 1, 0)
| stats count values(status) as statuses values(src_ip) as src_ips by uri_path
| where count > 15 AND suspicious=1
| table uri_path, count, statuses, src_ips

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="citrix,netscaler,web,">
  <rule id="202688772" level="12">
    <if_sid>31100</if_sid>
    <id>^/vpn/|^/gwtest|^/nf/auth</id>
    <description>CVE-2026-88772: Possible exploitation attempt against Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway (memory corruption / RCE/DoS).</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1190</id>
    </mitre>
    <group>attack,exploit_attempt,</group>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch confidence: 0/4 (UNPATCHED — no patch evidence from any tracked source).

  1. Immediate mitigations: Restrict and monitor external exposure of NetScaler ADC/Gateway management and VPN/Gateway interfaces to only required sources where feasible. Enable verbose logging on the edge appliance and forward logs to the SIEM for the detection rules above. Because the specifics of the exploited input are not documented, prioritize monitoring for crashes, unexpected restarts, or anomalous requests against the VPN/Gateway endpoints. Treat the appliance as a high-value asset and isolate it on a segmented management network.

  2. Patch/upgrade steps: Apply the fixed firmware referenced by the NVD description and confirm against Citrix's official security advisory. Target versions per the description: ADC 14.1-73.37, 13.1-64.23, 14.1-73.37 FIPS, 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway 14.1-73.37 and 13.1-64.23. Validate the current build via the appliance about system / version output before and after upgrade. Do not rely on this report alone — confirm the exact fixed build and any later revisions from Citrix.

  3. Long-term hardening: Maintain a firmware-patch cadence for all edge devices; subscribe to Citrix security bulletins and CISA KEV updates. Enforce MFA on Gateway access, minimize management-plane exposure, and adopt network segmentation for edge appliances. Retain sufficient logging and retrospective search capability to investigate historical exploitation after patching.

References

Note: No public PoC or exploit code was identified in the provided dataset; exploitation in the wild is presumed given the CISA KEV listing. Specific threat-actor attribution was not provided and is therefore not stated.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

product:"Citrix"
title:"Citrix"
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-88772/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.