☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Citrix logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-119
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-88776

CVE-2026-88776 Buffer Overflow in Citrix
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-09-27 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-28 23:58 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.34%
👁️
0.34% probability
8.5× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1499
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: USA License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: Netscaler Application Delivery Controller
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 9.8
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
9.8
THREAT LEVEL
INTEL SOURCES NVD EPSS HOW WE SCORE →
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-88776 is a memory overflow vulnerability affecting Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway appliances across multiple release trains, including both standard and FIPS/NDcPP builds. The flaw is remotely reachable and can lead to unpredictable or erroneous behavior, up to and including Denial of Service (DoS) of the affected appliance. Organizations exposing NetScaler ADC or Gateway to untrusted networks — particularly remote-access VPN and load-balancing deployments — should treat this as a high-availability risk pending vendor patching.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

The NVD description classifies this issue as a "memory overflow vulnerability" in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. Memory overflow is a broad defect class (mapped here to CWE-119, Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) in which a routine writes or reads beyond the intended boundaries of an allocated buffer. Depending on the direction (out-of-bounds write versus out-of-bounds read) and controllability of the overflowed data, outcomes range from process termination and memory corruption to, in the worst case, control-flow hijack.

Per the description, the observed/expected consequence is "unpredictable or erroneous behavior or Denial of Service." This wording indicates the vendor has not confirmed integrity or confidentiality impact and points primarily at availability loss — consistent with an attacker-induced crash or resource exhaustion of a NetScaler process.

Affected code paths span:

  • Citrix NetScaler ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP
  • Citrix NetScaler Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23

Attack surface: NetScaler ADC and Gateway are edge appliances terminating TLS, load-balancing application traffic, and providing remote-access VPN. Their externally reachable interfaces — virtual servers, authentication endpoints, and management paths — represent the plausible ingress for a malicious packet or request that reaches the vulnerable parsing/handling routine. The specific protocol field, URI, or API parameter that triggers the overflow is not disclosed in the available data.

The precise instruction or function responsible for the unchecked memory operation is not identifiable from the description provided. No public root-cause analysis, patch diff, or crash PoC is available. Any code-level detail beyond the overflow class would be speculation. Note that the FIPS and NDcPP builds are affected separately, implying a shared or parallel code base across release trains that requires distinct fixes.

Exploitation Scenarios

No public proof-of-concept, exploit code, or Nuclei template is available for CVE-2026-88776. CISA KEV does not list this CVE. The following attack chain is inferred from the vulnerability class (memory overflow) and the known exposure profile of NetScaler edge appliances; no specific function names, endpoints, or parameters are asserted, as none are disclosed in the source data.

  1. Reconnaissance / target identification: An adversary enumerates internet-facing Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway instances using fingerprinting (TLS certificate subject, login portal titles, HTTP response signatures). Exposed Gateway portals (remote-access) and ADC virtual servers are the primary targets. The objective is to identify a device running a version below the fixed builds listed above.

  2. Triggering the overflow: The attacker sends crafted input to the vulnerable parsing or request-handling path. At the vulnerability-class level, this means a malformed message, over-long field, or boundary-condition input that causes the appliance to write/read beyond a fixed buffer. No disclosure exists confirming whether authentication is required, so both pre-auth and authenticated vectors must be considered until clarified.

  3. Payload / execution method: For a memory overflow, the payload is the overflowed input itself. In a DoS-only outcome, a single crafted request or a small burst is sufficient to crash or destabilize the process. If the overflow is exploitable for corruption, a more complex payload could be required, but the vendor description does not confirm code-execution impact.

  4. Post-exploitation impact: Confirmed/expected impact is availability loss — NetScaler process termination, repeated restart, or a crash-recovery loop. Because ADC/Gateway frequently front critical applications and VPN access, a successful DoS can cascade into an outage of downstream services and loss of remote-worker connectivity. The description does not indicate data exfiltration, session theft, or persistence.

Attackers may chain this with brute-force or session-hijack attempts against NetScaler authentication, but such chaining is speculative and not supported by the CVE data.

Impact Assessment

  • Confidentiality: Not confirmed affected (Impact: None per inferred vector).
  • Integrity: Not confirmed affected (Impact: None per inferred vector).
  • Availability: High — the flaw is defined by unpredictable behavior and DoS.

Blast radius centers on edge availability. A compromised or crashed NetScaler removes load balancing, TLS termination, and remote-access VPN for every application and user it serves. In large enterprises, this can translate to organization-wide remote-work disruption and application downtime for all services behind the appliance. The affected population includes any NetScaler ADC or Gateway deployment not yet on the fixed releases, including separately affected FIPS and NDcPP builds — a consideration for government and regulated environments where FIPS compliance is mandatory.

Because no CVSS score was assigned by the vendor/NVD at time of writing (CVSS: N/A) and no EPSS score exists yet, risk must be assessed qualitatively. Given the edge-facing nature and the high-availability consequence, remediation should be prioritized even in the absence of a published exploit.

Detection Guidance

Sigma Rule

title: Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway Memory Overflow DoS Attempt (CVE-2026-88776)
id: 8f3c2a10-9d7e-4b1a-9c2e-7f5a1b0c4d21
status: experimental
description: Detects anomalous request patterns targeting Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway that may trigger the memory overflow described in CVE-2026-88776.
references:
  - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-88776
author: valtersit.com
date: 2026/01/01
tags:
  - attack.t1499
  - cve.2026.88776
logsource:
  category: webserver
  product: citrix
detection:
  selection:
    cs-uri-stem|contains:
      - '/vpn/'
      - '/nitro/'
  filter_burst:
    sc-status:
      - 500
      - 502
      - 503
  condition: selection and filter_burst
falsepositives:
  - Legitimate malformed client requests during network faults
level: medium

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_88776_NetScaler_Memory_Overflow
{
    meta:
        description = "Heuristic detection for exploitation attempts against Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway memory overflow (CVE-2026-88776)"
        author = "valtersit.com"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-88776"
    strings:
        $a = "NetScaler"
        $b = "Citrix"
        $p1 = "/vpn/"
        $p2 = "/nitro/v1/"
        $overflow = { 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 }
    condition:
        uint16(0) == 0x4854 and (any of ($a, $b)) and any of ($p1, $p2) and $overflow
}

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-88776 Citrix NetScaler Memory Overflow DoS Attempt"; flow:established,to_server; http.uri; content:"/vpn/"; http.header; content:"NetScaler"; pcre:"/(?:AAAA|\.\.\/){12,}/R"; threshold:type both, track by_src, count 5, seconds 10; classtype:attempted-dos; reference:cve,2026-88776; sid:202688776; rev:1;)

Elastic Detection

network where
  url.path : ("/vpn/*" or "/nitro/v1/*") and
  http.response.status_code in (500, 502, 503)
sequence by source.ip with maxspan=10s
  [network where url.path : "/vpn/*"]
  [network where http.response.status_code in (500, 502, 503)]

Splunk SPL Query

index=network sourcetype=citrix:netscaler OR sourcetype=stream:http
| search (uri_path="/vpn/*" OR uri_path="/nitro/v1/*") (status=500 OR status=502 OR status=503)
| bin _time span=10s
| stats count by src_ip, uri_path, _time
| where count > 5
| sort - count

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="citrix,netscaler,cve-2026-88776,">
  <rule id="202688776" level="10">
    <decoded_as>json</decoded_as>
    <field name="url.path">\/vpn\/|\/nitro\/v1\/</field>
    <field name="http.response.status_code">500|502|503</field>
    <description>CVE-2026-88776: Possible Citrix NetScaler memory overflow DoS attempt</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1499</id>
    </mitre>
    <group>attack,denial_of_service,</group>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch confidence: 0/4 (UNPATCHED — no patch evidence from any tracked source).

  1. Immediate mitigations:
  • Restrict management interfaces and VPN portals to trusted networks/allowlisted IPs where operationally feasible.
  • Place rate limiting, WAF, and connection-flood protection in front of NetScaler virtual servers and Gateway entry points.
  • Enable continuous health monitoring and automatic restart/watchdog on NetScaler to limit downtime from crash-induced availability loss, and alert on unexpected process restarts.
  • Review logs for repeated 5xx responses from /vpn/ and /nitro/ paths.
  1. Patch/upgrade steps (when vendor binaries are available):
  • ADC: upgrade to 14.1-73.37 or later, or 13.1-64.23 or later.
  • ADC FIPS/NDcPP: upgrade to 14.1-73.37 FIPS or later, or 13.1.37.279 FIPS or later.
  • Gateway: upgrade to 14.1-73.37 or later, or 13.1-64.23 or later.
  • Validate on a maintenance window; keep configuration backups prior to upgrade.
  1. Long-term hardening:
  • Maintain a formal edge-appliance patch cadence and subscribe to Citrix security bulletins.
  • Deploy centralized vulnerability management tracking CVE-2026-88776 across all NetScaler assets, including FIPS builds.
  • Segment management plane from data plane; enforce MFA on administrative access.
  • Enable and retain detailed logs to support retrospective compromise assessment.

References

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

product:"Citrix"
title:"Citrix"
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-88776/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.