☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Crocoblock logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 7.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L 🐛 CWE-79
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-94661

CVE-2026-94661 Cross-Site Scripting in Crocoblock
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-10-09 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-11 18:45 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.18%
👁️
0.18% probability
4.4× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1189
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
Country: Ukraine License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: UNKNOWN / CHECK VENDOR
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 7.1
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: R User Interaction Required
S: C Scope Changed
C: L Confidentiality Low
I: L Integrity Low
A: L Availability Low
7.1
THREAT LEVEL
INTEL SOURCES NVD EPSS HOW WE SCORE →
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-94661 is a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability (CWE-79) in the Crocoblock JetBlog WordPress plugin, affecting versions up to and including 2.4.10. The flaw arises from improper neutralization of user-supplied input during web page generation, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to inject arbitrary script into a victim's browser session when the victim interacts with a crafted request. Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, credential theft, and actions performed in the context of the victim's authenticated WordPress session. With a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L), the vulnerability requires user interaction and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability at a low level each, while the changed scope reflects cross-boundary impact on dependent components.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

The vulnerability is classified as "Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')" under CWE-79. This class of flaw occurs when an application reflects unsanitized, attacker-controlled input into an HTML response without proper encoding or validation. As a result, the browser interprets the injected content as part of the page's executable context rather than as inert data.

The affected product is the JetBlog plugin (part of the Crocoblock suite for WordPress), from an unspecified prior version through 2.4.10. Because JetBlog renders dynamic elements on WordPress-powered sites — such as post listing widgets, dynamic content modules, and query-driven display components — the reflected XSS occurs when a request parameter processed by a rendering routine is echoed back into the page body without escaping.

Key technical facts derivable from the provided data:

  • Vulnerability type: Reflected XSS (not stored).
  • Root cause: Missing/improper output encoding during web page generation, allowing script injection.
  • Attack vector: Network (AV:N), no privileges required (PR:N), but user interaction is required (UI:R).
  • Scope is changed (S:C), meaning exploitation can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component (e.g., the parent WordPress site and its plugins).

No specific parameter names, function names, endpoint paths, or file names are disclosed in the NVD description or CNA title. The description states only the vulnerability class and version range. Any parameter- or endpoint-level detail would be speculative and is therefore excluded. At the class level, the issue is a classic reflected XSS where input is neutralized improperly during page generation.

Exploitation Scenarios

No public PoC is available, and no exploit code exists in tracked sources. The following chain is inferred at the vulnerability-class level only, consistent with a reflected XSS in a WordPress plugin.

  1. Reconnaissance / Target Identification An attacker identifies WordPress sites running the JetBlog plugin at version 2.4.10 or earlier. Detection typically relies on fingerprinting plugin assets, static files, or behavioral responses unique to JetBlog-rendered pages. Public exposure of the plugin (e.g., via page source references or asset paths) increases the likelihood of discovery.

  2. Triggering the Flaw Class Reflected XSS requires that attacker-controlled input be included in a request and then reflected in the generated HTML response without proper escaping. The attacker crafts a URL or form submission containing a malicious payload in an input field processed by JetBlog's rendering logic. Because PR:N applies, no authentication is required to send the request; however, UI:R means the victim must interact with the crafted link or page for execution to occur.

  3. Payload / Execution Method (Class Level) The injected content is returned within the HTTP response body and interpreted by the victim's browser as active content. Execution occurs in the origin of the affected WordPress site. The exact payload would depend on reflection context (HTML body, attribute, script block), but all cases hinge on improper neutralization during page generation.

  4. Post-Exploitation Impact Because the script executes in the victim's browser under the site's origin, an attacker could:

  • Read and exfiltrate session cookies or authentication tokens not protected by HttpOnly/SameSite attributes.
  • Perform state-changing actions as the victim (CSRF-like effects), including modifying content or settings if the victim holds administrative privileges.
  • Redirect the victim to credential-harvesting pages or deliver further client-side payloads.
  • Conduct drive-by attacks against other authenticated users if a reflected payload can be embedded in a page viewed by multiple parties (though reflected XSS generally targets one user per crafted interaction).

The changed scope (S:C) indicates the impact may extend to the broader WordPress installation and its users, not just the plugin component. No specific account takeover, RCE, or server-side impact is claimed by the description, and none should be assumed.

Impact Assessment

Business impact centers on client-side compromise of users interacting with a vulnerable WordPress site. The most severe realistic outcomes are session theft and unauthorized actions via the victim's authenticated session, particularly damaging for administrator accounts.

CVSS 3.1 subscores:

  • AV:N (Network) — exploitable remotely.
  • AC:L (Low) — no special conditions beyond user interaction.
  • PR:N (None) — no authentication required to deliver the payload.
  • UI:R (Required) — victim must interact (e.g., click a link or submit a request).
  • S:C (Changed) — impact crosses security boundaries to the parent application.
  • C:L / I:L / A:L — limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.

Blast radius: Any WordPress site running JetBlog up to and including 2.4.10 is potentially affected. Because JetBlog is commonly deployed alongside other Crocoblock plugins and page builders (e.g., Elementor-based sites), such environments may present a larger attack surface. No EPSS score is available (not yet scored by FIRST.org). The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, and there is no evidence of active exploitation in the wild at this time.

Detection Guidance

Sigma Rule

title: Reflected XSS Attempt Against Crocoblock JetBlog (CVE-2026-94661)
id: 7f3c9a21-4b2e-4d8a-9c11-jetblog-xss-cve2026-94661
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP requests targeting WordPress sites with suspected script injection patterns in query strings or form data, indicative of reflected XSS attempts against JetBlog <= 2.4.10.
author: Threat Intelligence
date: 2026-01-01
logsource:
  category: webserver
  product: apache
detection:
  selection_method:
    cs-method:
      - GET
      - POST
  selection_payload:
    cs-uri-query|contains:
      - '<script'
      - '%3Cscript'
      - 'javascript:'
      - 'onerror='
      - 'onload='
      - 'document.cookie'
  condition: selection_method and selection_payload
fields:
  - c-ip
  - cs-uri
  - cs-uri-query
  - cs-user-agent
falsepositives:
  - Legitimate JavaScript-heavy applications echoing encoded input
  - Security scanners and penetration testing activity
level: medium
tags:
  - attack.t1189
  - cve.2026.94661

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_94661_JetBlog_Reflected_XSS
{
    meta:
        description = "Detects reflected XSS payloads associated with JetBlog (CVE-2026-94661)"
        author = "Threat Intelligence"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-94661"
        cve = "CVE-2026-94661"

    strings:
        $xss1 = "<script>" ascii nocase
        $xss2 = "javascript:" ascii nocase
        $xss3 = "onerror=" ascii nocase
        $xss4 = "document.cookie" ascii nocase
        $jetblog = "jet-blog" ascii nocase
        $jetblog2 = "jetblog" ascii nocase

    condition:
        uint16(0) == 0x3C3F or  // '<?'
        (
            any of ($xss*) and
            any of ($jetblog*)
        )
}

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-94661 Crocoblock JetBlog Reflected XSS Attempt"; flow:established,to_server; http.method; content:"GET"; http.uri; content:"jet-blog"; nocase; http.uri; pcre:"/(%3Cscript|<script|javascript:|onerror=)/i"; classtype:web-application-attack; reference:cve,2026-94661; sid:202694661; rev:1;)

Elastic Detection

network where
  network.transport == "tcp" and
  http.request.method in ("GET", "POST") and
  (
    http.request.uri : "*jet-blog*" or
    http.request.uri : "*jetblog*"
  ) and
  (
    http.request.uri : "*<script*" or
    http.request.uri : "*%3Cscript*" or
    http.request.uri : "*javascript:*" or
    http.request.uri : "*onerror=*"
  )

Splunk SPL Query

index=web sourcetype=access_combined
(http.url="*jet-blog*" OR http.url="*jetblog*")
(http.url="*%3Cscript*" OR http.url="*<script*" OR http.url="*javascript:*" OR http.url="*onerror=*")
| stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen by src_ip, http.url, http_user_agent
| where count > 0
| sort - count

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="web,appsec,attack,">
  <rule id="100661" level="10">
    <if_sid>31108</if_sid>
    <url>jet-blog|jetblog</url>
    <regex type="pcre2">(%3Cscript|<script|javascript:|onerror=)</regex>
    <description>CVE-2026-94661: Reflected XSS attempt against Crocoblock JetBlog detected</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1189</id>
    </mitre>
    <group>cve_2026_94661,</group>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch confidence: 0/4 (UNPATCHED — no patch evidence from any tracked source).

  1. Immediate Mitigations
  • Since no vendor patch is available, consider temporarily disabling the JetBlog plugin if it is not operationally required.
  • If the plugin must remain active, deploy a web application firewall (WAF) with rules that block reflected XSS patterns in query strings and POST bodies, particularly targeting requests interacting with JetBlog-rendered pages.
  • Enforce Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict inline script execution, reducing the exploitability of injection points.
  • Configure session cookies with HttpOnly and SameSite attributes to limit the impact of session theft.
  1. Patch / Upgrade Steps
  • Monitor Crocoblock's official channels for a JetBlog release beyond 2.4.10 that addresses this vulnerability.
  • Once a fixed version is published, upgrade immediately and verify the plugin version post-upgrade.
  • As of this report, there is no vendor fix, workaround, or patch reference available from tracked sources.
  1. Long-Term Hardening
  • Maintain an inventory of WordPress plugins and subscribe to vulnerability feeds for timely advisory awareness.
  • Remove or deactivate unused plugins to reduce attack surface.
  • Apply the principle of least privilege to WordPress user roles, limiting administrator exposure.
  • Conduct regular security assessments, including authenticated and unauthenticated XSS testing against user-facing components.
  • Implement centralized logging and alerting for web requests exhibiting common XSS payload signatures.

References

No known threat actor campaigns or exploit-in-the-wild evidence are associated with CVE-2026-94661 in the data provided. No public PoC or exploit code is available.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

product:"Crocoblock"
title:"Crocoblock"
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-94661/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.