Oobabooga

Open Source github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui ↗
C
CAUTION
5
Total CVEs
3
Crit / High
2
Medium
0%
Unpatched
100%
Patched
8.0
Avg CVSS
0
CISA KEV
// Data sourced from NVD · CISA KEV · RHSA · GHSA · Debian · OSV · EPSS · Exploit-DB How we collect data →
// INTEL UPGRADE
Full Company Dossier — Coming Soon
Executive profiles, financial exposure, M&A risk, breach history & supply-chain threat mapping — all in one place.
OSINT FINANCIALS EXEC PROFILES BREACH DB
▸ CVE Trend by Year
▸ Patch Coverage
Patched
100%
Unpatched
0%
✓ 1 patched ✗ 0 unpatched
▸ Intelligence by Audience
PoC Available
0 / 20 shown
CISA KEV (Exploited)
0
Shodan Dorks
ssl:"oobabooga" port:443
org:"Oobabooga" http.status:200
Top EPSS (Exploitation Probability)
CVE-2025-62364 0.57% exploitation probability
Quick Facts for Reporting
Total CVEs tracked
5
Critical severity
3
Actively exploited (CISA)
0
Unpatched ratio
0%
Avg CVSS score
8.0
Security grade
C (CAUTION)
NVD Data Attribution
Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (NVD) + GitHub Advisory Database.
Data aggregated by Valters IT Hub · valtersit.com
Last updated: 2026-08-10
Security Risk Score (for investors)
LOW
Vuln Volume
GOOD
Patch Responsiveness
LOW
CISA Exposure
⚠ Not financial advice. Past security incidents do not guarantee future stock performance.
▸ Security News Google News

No recent security news found for Oobabooga.

▸ Recent CVEs showing 20 of 1
CVE IDSeverityPatchEPSSDate
CVE-2025-62364 6.2 MEDIUM PATCHED / FIX AVAILABLE 0.57% 2025-10-13
View all 1 CVEs for Oobabooga →
▸Intel
LicenseOpen Source
Trust ScoreC — CAUTION
Max CVSS9.8
Last Updated2026-08-10
▸Top Weaknesses
CWE-20
Unknown Weakness Type
2 occurrences in Oobabooga CVEs (40% of total)
CWE-20 ⓘ
2
CWE-22
Unknown Weakness Type
2 occurrences in Oobabooga CVEs (40% of total)
CWE-22 ⓘ
2
CWE-73
Unknown Weakness Type
1 occurrence in Oobabooga CVEs (20% of total)
CWE-73 ⓘ
1
▸Company Profile

Oobabooga's text-generation-webui is an open-source Gradio-based web interface designed for running large language models locally. It is widely used by AI researchers and hobbyists for local model deployment and experimentation, and has been the subject of several CVEs, including remote code execution and path traversal vulnerabilities.

▸Response Metrics
Est. MTTR ⓘ ~30 days (Good)
Mean Time To Remediate. Estimates days from CVE disclosure to patch.
Industry avg: ~60d (good) · 100-300d (poor) · 300d+ (critical)
CVE Trend ⓘ ↘ -33% better
CVE count 2026 vs 2025:  3 → 2 CVEs
Patch Speed ⓘ Average (40–65%)
0% of CVEs still unpatched.  Excellent: <20% · Good: 20-40% · Avg: 40-65% · Poor: >65%
▸ Financial Risk Estimate
Est. GDPR Low
€390K
Est. GDPR High
€3.9M

Based on 3 critical CVEs, 0 CISA KEV, 60% unpatched. Model: GDPR Art.83 · not legal advice.

▸Actions
⚖ Compare with another vendor
▸Embed Badge
Oobabooga C valtersit.com