Saitoha
A
TRUSTED
5
Total CVEs
2
Crit / High
2
Medium
0%
Unpatched
0%
Patched
5.3
Avg CVSS
0
CISA KEV
// Data sourced from NVD · CISA KEV · RHSA · GHSA · Debian · OSV · EPSS · Exploit-DB
How we collect data →
CVE Trend by Year
Patch Coverage
✓ 0 patched ✗ 0 unpatched
Intelligence by Audience
PoC Available
0 / 20 shown
CISA KEV (Exploited)
0
Shodan Dorks
ssl:"saitoha" port:443
org:"Saitoha" http.status:200
Top EPSS (Exploitation Probability)
No EPSS data yet for recent CVEs — scores are published by FIRST.org within 24-48h of NVD disclosure.
Quick Facts for Reporting
Total CVEs tracked
5
Critical severity
0
Actively exploited (CISA)
0
Unpatched ratio
0%
Avg CVSS score
5.3
Security grade
A (TRUSTED)
NVD Data Attribution
Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (NVD) + GitHub Advisory Database.
Data aggregated by Valters IT Hub · valtersit.com
Last updated: 2026-07-21
Data aggregated by Valters IT Hub · valtersit.com
Last updated: 2026-07-21
Security Risk Score (for investors)
LOW
Vuln Volume
GOOD
Patch Responsiveness
LOW
CISA Exposure
⚠ Not financial advice. Past security incidents do not guarantee future stock performance.
Security News Google News
No recent security news found for Saitoha.
Recent CVEs
showing 20 of 0
No published CVEs found.
Intel
CountryJapan
LicenseOpen Source
Trust ScoreA — TRUSTED
Max CVSS7.4
Last Updated2026-07-21
Top Weaknesses
CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
1 occurrence in Saitoha CVEs
(20% of total)
CWE-122
Heap-Based Buffer Overflow
1 occurrence in Saitoha CVEs
(20% of total)
CWE-119
Buffer Overflow
1 occurrence in Saitoha CVEs
(20% of total)
CWE-401
Unknown Weakness Type
1 occurrence in Saitoha CVEs
(20% of total)
CWE-190
Integer Overflow
1 occurrence in Saitoha CVEs
(20% of total)
Company Profile
Saitoha is a Japanese software developer known for creating terminal emulators and system utilities, including the popular 'rxvt-unicode' (urxvt) fork 'rxvt-unicode-256color' and the 'libsixel' library for sixel graphics. Their products are primarily used in Unix-like environments, and the vendor's cybersecurity relevance stems from vulnerabilities in these tools that could affect terminal security and remote code execution.
Response Metrics
Est. MTTR ⓘ
~500 days
(Critical)
Mean Time To Remediate. Estimates days from CVE disclosure to patch.
Industry avg: ~60d (good) · 100-300d (poor) · 300d+ (critical)
Industry avg: ~60d (good) · 100-300d (poor) · 300d+ (critical)
CVE Trend ⓘ ↗ +300% worse
CVE count 2026 vs 2025:
1 → 4 CVEs
Patch Speed ⓘ Excellent (<20% open)
0% of CVEs still unpatched.
Excellent: <20% · Good: 20-40% · Avg: 40-65% · Poor: >65%
Financial Risk Estimate
Est. GDPR Low
€0K
Est. GDPR High
€0K
Based on 0 critical CVEs, 0 CISA KEV, 0% unpatched. Model: GDPR Art.83 · not legal advice.
Actions
Embed Badge
Saitoha A valtersit.com