☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
[ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 3.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N 🐛 CWE-200
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2023-22836

CVE-2023-22836 Information Disclosure in Palantir
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-01-29 18:50 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-08-12 14:52 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.06%
👁️
0.06% probability
1.4× above the median CVE
Tier: LOW
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1087
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 3.5
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: L Attack Complexity Low
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: L Confidentiality Low
I: N Integrity None
A: N Availability None
3.5
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2023-22836 is a low-severity information disclosure vulnerability affecting Palantir Foundry's Linter service in multi-tenant deployments. The flaw allows a tenant user who renames a group from its default value to inadvertently expose that renamed value to other tenants on the same stack. This is a cross-tenant data leak that violates the multi-tenant isolation model. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 3.5 (Low) and an EPSS score of 0.0%, indicating very low exploitation likelihood. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code exists. The vendor has not confirmed a patch status.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to any open-source package (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). It is a proprietary SaaS configuration issue within Palantir Foundry.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 3.5 (Low)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
  • Attack Vector: Network (AV:N) – The attack is performed over the network.
  • Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) – No special conditions required.
  • Privileges Required: Low (PR:L) – Attacker needs a valid tenant user account.
  • User Interaction: None (UI:N) – No user action required.
  • Scope: Unchanged (S:U) – The vulnerable component and impacted component are the same.
  • Confidentiality Impact: Low (C:L) – Limited information disclosure (group names).
  • Integrity Impact: None (I:N) – No data modification.
  • Availability Impact: None (A:N) – No service disruption.

Threat Level: Low. The vulnerability requires an authenticated tenant user and only leaks group names, not sensitive data. However, in multi-tenant environments, group names may reveal organizational structure or project names.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The vulnerability resides in Palantir Foundry's Linter service, which is used for code quality and policy enforcement. In a multi-tenant stack, each tenant has isolated resources, including groups. When a tenant user renames a group from its default name (e.g., "default-group" to "project-alpha"), the Linter service fails to properly scope the renamed group to the tenant's namespace. Instead, the renamed value becomes visible to other tenants on the same stack.

Root Cause: The Linter service likely caches or stores group metadata in a shared namespace without proper tenant isolation. When a group is renamed, the update is propagated to a global cache or database that is accessible by all tenants. The service does not enforce a tenant-specific prefix or access control check when returning group names.

Attack Scenario:

  1. Attacker (tenant A) logs into Foundry and accesses the Linter service.
  2. Attacker renames a group from its default name (e.g., "default-group") to a custom name (e.g., "secret-project").
  3. Victim (tenant B) uses the Linter service and sees the renamed group name "secret-project" in their list of available groups.
  4. Victim can infer that tenant A is working on a project named "secret-project".

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since no patch details are available, we can only hypothesize the vulnerable and patched code patterns.

Vulnerable Code (Hypothetical):

# Vulnerable: Group name stored without tenant isolation
def rename_group(group_id, new_name):
    group = db.groups.find_one({"_id": group_id})
    group["name"] = new_name
    db.groups.save(group)
    # Cache updated globally
    cache.set(f"group_name_{group_id}", new_name)

Patched Code (Hypothetical):

# Patched: Group name stored with tenant isolation
def rename_group(tenant_id, group_id, new_name):
    group = db.groups.find_one({"tenant_id": tenant_id, "_id": group_id})
    group["name"] = new_name
    db.groups.save(group)
    # Cache updated with tenant-specific key
    cache.set(f"tenant_{tenant_id}_group_name_{group_id}", new_name)

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Attacker)

Prerequisites:

  • Valid user account on a multi-tenant Palantir Foundry stack.
  • Access to the Linter service.
  • Ability to rename a group.

Steps:

  1. Log in to Foundry as a tenant user.
  2. Navigate to the Linter service.
  3. Identify a group with a default name (e.g., "default-group").
  4. Rename the group to a distinctive name (e.g., "my-secret-project").
  5. Switch to another tenant account (or collaborate with another tenant user) and access the Linter service.
  6. Observe that the renamed group name is visible in the group list.

Proof-of-Concept (No exploit code available):

# No public exploit code exists. This is a configuration-based attack.
# Steps are manual via the Foundry UI.

Blue Team (Defender)

Detection:

  • Monitor for group rename events in audit logs.
  • Look for cross-tenant access patterns in Linter service logs.
  • Alert on group names that appear in multiple tenant contexts.

Mitigation:

  • Ensure tenant isolation is enforced at the application layer.
  • Implement strict access control checks when returning group metadata.
  • Use tenant-specific prefixes or namespaces for all cached data.

Lab Setup:

  • Deploy a multi-tenant Palantir Foundry instance (if available).
  • Create two tenant accounts.
  • Use the Linter service to rename a group from one tenant and verify visibility from the other.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Log Entries: Group rename events in audit logs without tenant context.
  • Network Traffic: API calls to /linter/groups/rename or similar endpoints.
  • Behavioral: A group name appearing in multiple tenant contexts in Linter service responses.

Example IOC (Log Entry):

{
  "event": "group_rename",
  "user": "tenant_a_user",
  "group_id": "g-12345",
  "old_name": "default-group",
  "new_name": "my-secret-project",
  "tenant_id": "tenant_a"
}

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2023_22836_GroupRenameLeak {
    meta:
        description = "Detects group rename events that may indicate CVE-2023-22836 exploitation"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2025-04-10"
        reference = "CVE-2023-22836"
    strings:
        $rename_event = "group_rename" nocase
        $linter_service = "linter" nocase
        $tenant_context = "tenant_id" nocase
    condition:
        $rename_event and $linter_service and not $tenant_context
}

Sigma Rule

title: CVE-2023-22836 - Cross-Tenant Group Name Leak
id: 8a9b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d
status: experimental
description: Detects group rename events without tenant context in Palantir Foundry Linter service
author: Valters IT
date: 2025-04-10
logsource:
    product: palantir_foundry
    service: linter
detection:
    selection:
        event: "group_rename"
    filter:
        tenant_id: null
    condition: selection and filter
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate group renames in single-tenant stacks
level: low

Suricata Rule

alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"CVE-2023-22836 - Cross-Tenant Group Name Leak"; flow:to_server; content:"/linter/groups/rename"; http_uri; nocase; content:"new_name"; http_client_body; nocase; pcre:"/tenant_id[^}]*null/i"; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Isolate Tenant Data: Ensure all group metadata is stored with tenant-specific keys or namespaces.
  2. Audit Logs: Review audit logs for group rename events and verify tenant isolation.
  3. Access Controls: Implement strict access control checks when returning group names to ensure only the owning tenant can see them.

Long-Term Fix:

  • Apply vendor patch if available. Contact Palantir support for guidance.
  • Implement a tenant-aware caching layer that prefixes all keys with the tenant ID.
  • Conduct a security review of multi-tenant isolation in all Foundry services.

Workarounds:

  • Disable group renaming functionality if not required.
  • Restrict Linter service access to trusted users only.

Valters IT Signature: This report was generated by Valters IT DevSecOps AI. For questions, contact security@valters-it.com.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

Palantir Foundry
Foundry Linter
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2023-22836/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.