☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]

CVE-2024-5445

CVE-2024-5445 Security Advisory in N-able
📅 PUBLISHED: 2024-08-08 22:04 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-23 20:36 UTC
[ PATCH UNDER REVIEW ↓ ] Remains UNDER REVIEW until an independent source confirms the fix
[ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.29%
👁️
0.29% probability
7.4× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
VULNERABLE: version not auto-detected — verify your deployed version locally
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
3.8
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2024-5445 is a vulnerability in N-able's Ecosystem Agent (versions 4 and 5) that stems from improper validation of SSL/TLS certificates. This flaw allows a malicious actor with privileged network access to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, intercepting and potentially reading traffic between the agent and N-able servers. The vulnerability has a low CVSS score of 3.8 due to the requirement of privileged network access and the limited impact on confidentiality. No public proof-of-concept (PoC) or exploit code is currently available, and the EPSS score is 0.0%, indicating a very low probability of exploitation in the wild. The primary risk is to organizations where an attacker has already gained a foothold on the network, enabling them to eavesdrop on sensitive management traffic.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Supply Chain & Package Security

This vulnerability is not related to an open-source package manager (NPM, PyPI, Go, Ruby). It affects a proprietary agent software used for remote monitoring and management (RMM). The supply chain risk is limited to the software distribution channels of N-able, which should be secured via code signing and integrity checks.

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

  • CVSS Score: 3.8 (Low)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
  • Attack Vector (AV): Adjacent Network (AV:A) – The attacker must be on the same network segment as the agent.
  • Attack Complexity (AC): Low (AC:L) – No special conditions are required.
  • Privileges Required (PR): None (PR:N) – No authentication needed.
  • User Interaction (UI): None (UI:N) – No user action required.
  • Scope (S): Unchanged (S:U) – The vulnerability does not affect other components.
  • Confidentiality (C): Low (C:L) – Limited information disclosure.
  • Integrity (I): None (I:N) – No data modification.
  • Availability (A): None (A:N) – No denial of service.

Threat Level: Low. Exploitation requires a privileged network position, and the impact is limited to information disclosure. However, in environments where the agent handles sensitive credentials or configuration data, the risk is elevated.

Deep Dive & Mechanics

The N-able Ecosystem Agent is a component of the N-able RMM platform, used for remote monitoring and management of endpoints. It communicates with N-able servers over HTTPS to send telemetry, receive commands, and perform updates.

The vulnerability lies in the agent's failure to properly validate the SSL/TLS certificate presented by the server during the TLS handshake. Specifically, the agent does not verify that the certificate is signed by a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) or that the hostname matches the certificate's Common Name (CN) or Subject Alternative Name (SAN). This allows an attacker who can intercept network traffic (e.g., via ARP spoofing, rogue DHCP, or compromised network infrastructure) to present a self-signed or otherwise invalid certificate.

When the agent connects to the legitimate N-able server, the attacker intercepts the connection and presents their own certificate. Since the agent does not validate the certificate, it accepts the connection, and the attacker can then decrypt, read, and potentially modify the traffic before forwarding it to the real server. This is a classic MitM attack.

The root cause is a missing or incomplete implementation of certificate validation logic in the agent's TLS stack. This is a common oversight in custom or embedded TLS implementations.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code

Since the source code is proprietary, we cannot provide exact code snippets. However, the conceptual difference is as follows:

Vulnerable Code (Conceptual):

// Pseudo-code for vulnerable agent
void connect_to_server() {
    SSL_CTX *ctx = SSL_CTX_new(TLS_client_method());
    SSL *ssl = SSL_new(ctx);
    SSL_set_fd(ssl, socket_fd);
    SSL_connect(ssl); // No certificate verification
    // Proceed with communication
}

Patched Code (Conceptual):

// Pseudo-code for patched agent
void connect_to_server() {
    SSL_CTX *ctx = SSL_CTX_new(TLS_client_method());
    SSL_CTX_set_verify(ctx, SSL_VERIFY_PEER, NULL); // Enable verification
    SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations(ctx, "/path/to/ca_certs.pem", NULL); // Load trusted CAs
    SSL *ssl = SSL_new(ctx);
    SSL_set_fd(ssl, socket_fd);
    SSL_connect(ssl);
    if (SSL_get_verify_result(ssl) != X509_V_OK) {
        // Handle verification failure
        return;
    }
    // Proceed with communication
}

The patched version enables peer certificate verification and loads a set of trusted CA certificates. It also checks the verification result and aborts the connection if validation fails.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team (Attacker)

Prerequisites:

  • Attacker machine on the same network segment as the target agent.
  • Ability to perform ARP spoofing or other MitM techniques.
  • A tool like mitmproxy or bettercap to intercept and modify traffic.

Lab Setup:

  1. Network Topology: A target machine running a vulnerable N-able Ecosystem Agent (e.g., version 4.1.5.2596) and an attacker machine (e.g., Kali Linux) on the same subnet.
  2. Attacker Tools: bettercap for ARP spoofing, openssl to generate a self-signed certificate, and mitmproxy to intercept traffic.

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Generate a self-signed certificate:
    openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout key.pem -out cert.pem -days 365 -nodes -subj "/CN=*.n-able.com"
    
  2. Start ARP spoofing:
    sudo bettercap -eval "set arp.spoof.targets <target_ip>; arp.spoof on"
    
  3. Run mitmproxy with the self-signed certificate:
    mitmproxy --mode transparent --listen-port 443 --ssl-insecure --certs *=cert.pem
    
  4. Observe traffic: The agent will connect to the attacker's proxy, which will decrypt and display the traffic. The attacker can read any data sent by the agent.

Blue Team (Defender)

Detection:

  • Monitor for unexpected SSL/TLS certificate validation failures in agent logs.
  • Use network monitoring to detect ARP spoofing or unusual traffic patterns.
  • Implement endpoint detection and response (EDR) to alert on processes performing TLS connections without proper validation.

Prevention:

  • Apply the vendor patch immediately.
  • Use network segmentation to limit the attack surface.
  • Deploy certificate pinning or public key pinning (HPKP) where possible.
  • Enable strict certificate validation in all client software.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

  • Network IOCs:
    • Unexpected ARP replies (ARP spoofing) on the local network.
    • TLS connections to N-able servers using self-signed or untrusted certificates.
    • Unusual traffic patterns, such as multiple connections to the same server with different certificates.
  • Host IOCs:
    • Agent logs showing SSL/TLS handshake failures or warnings about certificate validation.
    • Presence of tools like mitmproxy or bettercap on the network.
  • File IOCs:
    • Self-signed certificates in unexpected locations (e.g., /tmp/cert.pem).

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule Detect_Nable_Ecosystem_Agent_MitM {
    meta:
        description = "Detects potential MitM attack on N-able Ecosystem Agent via improper certificate validation"
        author = "Valters IT"
        date = "2024-01-01"
        reference = "CVE-2024-5445"
    strings:
        $s1 = "SSL_connect" ascii wide nocase
        $s2 = "SSL_CTX_set_verify" ascii wide nocase
        $s3 = "SSL_get_verify_result" ascii wide nocase
    condition:
        $s1 and not ($s2 and $s3)
}

Sigma Rule

title: N-able Ecosystem Agent Improper Certificate Validation
id: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
status: experimental
description: Detects attempts to exploit CVE-2024-5445 by monitoring for TLS connections without proper certificate validation.
author: Valters IT
date: 2024-01-01
logsource:
    category: process_creation
    product: windows
detection:
    selection:
        Image|endswith: '\ecosystem_agent.exe'
        CommandLine|contains: '--ssl-insecure'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate testing tools
level: high

Suricata Rule

alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET 443 (msg:"CVE-2024-5445 N-able Ecosystem Agent MitM Attempt"; flow:to_server; tls.cert_issuer:!".*N-able.*"; tls.cert_subject:!".*n-able.com.*"; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions:

  1. Patch: Upgrade all N-able Ecosystem Agents to version 4.1.5.2597 or later (for version 4) or version 5.1.4.2473 or later (for version 5).
  2. Network Segmentation: Isolate agent traffic on a separate VLAN to limit the impact of a MitM attack.
  3. Monitor: Enable logging and monitoring for SSL/TLS certificate validation failures.

Long-Term Measures:

  • Implement certificate pinning in all client software.
  • Use mutual TLS (mTLS) for agent-server communication.
  • Conduct regular security audits of third-party software.
  • Deploy network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) to detect MitM attacks.

Workarounds (if patching is not immediately possible):

  • Use a VPN or IPsec tunnel for agent communication.
  • Restrict network access to only trusted devices.
  • Manually verify the server certificate fingerprint in the agent configuration (if supported).

Valters IT
Securing Digital Frontiers

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2024-5445/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.