☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Dell logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 3.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N 🐛 CWE-348
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-78015

CVE-2026-78015 Vulnerability in Dell
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-10-09 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-10 05:00 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.10%
👁️
0.10% probability
2.5× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1190
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: < 5.34.00.16
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 3.7
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: H Attack Complexity High
PR: N Privileges Required None
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: N Confidentiality None
I: L Integrity Low
A: N Availability None
3.7
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-78015 is a Use of Less Trusted Source (CWE-348) vulnerability in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager prior to version 5.34.00.16. An unauthenticated, remote attacker may be able to influence the source of data or policy processing decisions, resulting in information tampering (CVSS 3.7, integrity-only impact). The vulnerability is not on the CISA KEV catalog, has no public PoC, no Nuclei template, no exploit code, and has not yet been scored by FIRST.org (EPSS).

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

CWE-348 ("Use of Less Trusted Source") describes a defect in which software consumes data, configuration, or policy input from a source whose trust level is lower than the context requires, instead of a source that should be authoritative or more trustworthy. The consequences are generally integrity-related: an attacker who can present or influence that less-trusted source can cause the application to act on data the application believed to be legitimate.

Per the NVD description, the affected component is Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager in versions prior to 5.34.00.16. The vulnerability is remotely reachable (AV:N), requires no privileges (PR:N), and no user interaction (UI:N). The only CVSS impact measured is integrity (I:L), with confidentiality (C:N) and availability (A:N) unaffected. The AC:H rating reflects that exploitation is not reliably automatable and likely depends on preconditions — for example, attacker positioning relative to the affected service or specific environmental factors — rather than being a trivial, always-successful remote trigger.

At the vulnerability-class level, exploitation of CWE-348 typically involves one of several patterns: the application accepts input from a channel with weaker authentication/validation than its primary trust path; the application reads a value from a lower-trust origin (a client-supplied header, a less-protected auxiliary service, or an unauthenticated endpoint) and acts on it as if it were authoritative; or trust is established via an identifier that an attacker can control. Because the NVD description does not disclose specific endpoints, parameters, functions, or classes involved in SCG Policy Manager's implementation, no code-level detail is asserted here. Any implementation-specific claim beyond the CWE class and the CVSS characteristics would be speculation.

SCG Policy Manager is the policy-authoring/management component of the Secure Connect Gateway family, which is used by administrators to define and distribute connectivity, monitoring, and support policy to managed Dell infrastructure. Because policy data drives downstream behavior across managed devices, a defect that permits manipulation of a policy-relevant, less-trusted source carries a logical integrity risk that can exceed the nominal I:L score if tampered policy is subsequently applied. The CVSS vector, however, constrains the scored impact to Low integrity only.

No public root-cause analysis, vendor technical advisory detail, or proof-of-concept exists at the time of writing. The attack chain below is therefore inferred from the vulnerability class (CWE-348), not from observed exploit code.

Exploitation Scenarios

Note: No public PoC, exploit code, or Nuclei template is available. The following describes the attack at the vulnerability-class level only, consistent with CWE-348 and the CVSS characteristics (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). No specific function names, API paths, parameters, or file paths are asserted because none are provided in the source data.

  1. Reconnaissance and target identification An attacker with remote network reachability to a Dell Secure Connect Gateway / SCG Policy Manager deployment identifies exposed management interfaces. SCG Policy Manager is typically deployed as a central management service; internet-exposed or cross-zone-reachable instances are the primary targets. Enumeration focuses on discovering the Policy Manager service, its version, and any auxiliary endpoints or components it consumes data from. Version fingerprinting matters: only versions prior to 5.34.00.16 are affected.

  2. Triggering the less-trusted-source flaw The attacker identifies a data or policy source that the Policy Manager treats as authoritative but that can be influenced or supplied without adequate trust verification. At the class level, this is the essence of CWE-348: the application uses a source that should not be trusted for the decision it is making. The AC:H factor indicates the attacker must satisfy environmental or positioning preconditions — plausible examples include being able to reach a particular service, interpose on a data flow, or control a value that the application accepts from a lower-trust channel. Because the description does not specify the channel, the exact mechanism is unknown; the attacker's objective is to become the source the application trusts.

  3. Influence/substitution of data Rather than delivering a classic memory-corruption payload, the attacker supplies or alters data interpreted by the Policy Manager as legitimate. The manipulated content then propagates through policy processing. No payload construction detail can be given beyond this class-level description.

  4. Post-exploitation impact Successful exploitation leads to information tampering (I:L). This is an integrity offense: the attacker can cause the gateway/policy system to operate on altered data, potentially affecting the policies distributed to or applied by managed endpoints. There is no scored confidentiality or availability impact, and no code execution or privilege escalation is claimed by the CVSS vector. Real-world downstream effect depends on how SCG Policy Manager consumes the affected source and what policy actions depend on it.

Impact Assessment

CVSS 3.1 base score: 3.7 (LOW), vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N.

  • Attack Vector: Network — the flaw is remotely reachable.
  • Attack Complexity: High — preconditions must be met; not reliably automatable.
  • Privileges Required: None — unauthenticated.
  • User Interaction: None.
  • Scope: Unchanged — impact stays within the vulnerable component's security authority.
  • Confidentiality: None.
  • Integrity: Low — limited tampering of information.
  • Availability: None.

Blast radius: Organizations running Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager below 5.34.00.16. Because Policy Manager governs policy for managed environments, tampered policy or configuration data could propagate to downstream systems, but the score restricts direct impact to low-severity integrity. EPSS is not yet available, and the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV, so opportunistic, mass-exploitation risk is currently assessed as low. The absence of a public exploit raises the skill and effort bar. No business-critical outage is implied by the vector; the primary concern is trust in policy/data correctness and the integrity of management decisions.

Detection Guidance

Detection here is necessarily heuristic because no exploit artifact is published. The rules below target anomalous interaction with a Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager management interface and suspicious tampering patterns; they must be tuned to the environment's normal traffic profile.

Sigma Rule

title: Suspicious Unauthenticated Interaction with Dell SCG Policy Manager (CWE-348)
id: 8f1c2b74-9a3e-4d21-b0c7-scg202678015
status: experimental
description: Detects abnormal, unauthenticated access patterns to Dell Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager management interfaces that may indicate exploitation of a Use of Less Trusted Source (CWE-348) flaw (CVE-2026-78015).
references:
  - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78015
author: valtersit.com
date: 2026/01/01
logsource:
  category: webserver
detection:
  selection_path:
    cs-uri-stem|contains:
      - '/policy'
      - '/scg'
      - '/gateway'
  selection_status:
    sc-status:
      - 200
      - 201
      - 202
  selection_method:
    cs-method:
      - 'POST'
      - 'PUT'
      - 'PATCH'
  filter_auth:
    cs-username: null
  condition: selection_path and selection_status and selection_method and filter_auth
falsepositives:
  - Legitimate unauthenticated health or discovery endpoints
  - Misconfigured proxies stripping authentication headers
level: medium
tags:
  - attack.t1190
  - cve.2026.78015

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_78015_SCG_Policy_Manager_Tamper_Indicators
{
    meta:
        description = "Heuristic detection for artifacts potentially related to CVE-2026-78015 (CWE-348) in Dell Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager"
        author = "valtersit.com"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78015"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        severity = "low"
    strings:
        $p1 = "Secure Connect Gateway" ascii nocase
        $p2 = "SCG Policy Manager" ascii nocase
        $v1 = "5.34.00.16" ascii
        $t1 = "less trusted source" ascii nocase
    condition:
        (any of ($p1, $p2)) and any of ($v1, $t1)
}

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-78015 Possible Dell SCG Policy Manager Less-Trusted-Source Tampering Attempt"; flow:established,to_server; http.method; content:"POST"; http.uri; content:"policy"; nocase; http.header; content:"User-Agent"; negate; pcre:"/policy/i"; reference:cve,2026-78015; reference:url,nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78015; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:202678015; rev:1;)

Note: This is a best-effort heuristic. No exploit signature exists publicly; false-positive potential is high and must be baselined locally.

Elastic Detection

sequence by source.ip with maxspan=5m
  [ network where network.protocol == "http" and http.request.method in ("POST","PUT","PATCH")
    and url.path : ("*policy*" or "*scg*" or "*gateway*") ]
  [ network where network.protocol == "http" and http.response.status_code in (200,201,202)
    and url.path : ("*policy*" or "*scg*" or "*gateway*") ]

Detects repeated unauthenticated write attempts to Policy Manager paths followed by accepted responses, which may indicate integrity tampering tied to CVE-2026-78015.

Splunk SPL Query

index=web OR index=proxy
| search (uri_path="*policy*" OR uri_path="*scg*" OR uri_path="*gateway*")
| where method IN ("POST","PUT","PATCH") AND status IN (200,201,202)
| stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(uri_path) as paths by src_ip, user
| where count > 5
| convert ctime(first_seen) ctime(last_seen)
| sort - count

Baseline normal write operations to the Policy Manager and alert on deviations, especially unauthenticated writes (empty user field) from new or external source IPs.

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="web,scg,cve_2026_78015,">
  <rule id="202678015" level="7">
    <if_sid>31100</if_sid>
    <id>^POST|^PUT|^PATCH</id>
    <url>policy|scg|gateway</url>
    <description>CVE-2026-78015: Possible unauthenticated Policy Manager tampering attempt against Dell SCG (CWE-348)</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1190</id>
    </mitre>
    <group>attack_integrity,</group>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch confidence: 0/4 (UNPATCHED — no patch evidence from any tracked source). The NVD description names 5.34.00.16 as the first non-vulnerable version, but this report could not verify a vendor advisory, patch, or hash from any tracked source. Confirm the fix directly with Dell before relying on it.

  1. Immediate mitigations
  • Restrict network exposure of Dell Secure Connect Gateway / SCG Policy Manager management interfaces: remove internet-facing access, bind management to an isolated management VLAN, and enforce allow-list access from trusted administrative hosts only.
  • Place Policy Manager behind an authenticated reverse proxy or zero-trust access gateway; do not expose its native interface directly.
  • Enforce strong authentication and network segmentation between Policy Manager and any helper/source services it consumes data from.
  • Monitor and baseline legitimate policy write operations; alert on unauthenticated or anomalous writes.
  1. Patch / upgrade steps
  • Verify the affected version. If below 5.34.00.16, plan an upgrade to 5.34.00.16 or later — but first confirm this version against the official Dell support advisory for this CVE, since patch evidence is unverified here.
  • Obtain the update only from Dell's official support/download channel and validate package integrity before deployment.
  • Stage the upgrade in a test environment, back up policy configuration, then roll out to production.
  • After upgrading, confirm the running version and re-test exposed interfaces.
  1. Long-term hardening
  • Maintain an asset inventory and version tracking for all Secure Connect Gateway components.
  • Adopt least-privilege and zero-trust access for all management-plane services; never expose them directly to untrusted networks.
  • Establish a vulnerability management process that monitors Dell advisories and NVD for SCG components, and re-scan after patches.
  • Implement integrity monitoring for policy data and configuration, with alerting on unexpected changes.
  • Log and review all administrative and unauthenticated access to management interfaces.

References

Threat actor campaigns / exploit-in-the-wild: None. CVE-2026-78015 is not in CISA KEV, has no public PoC, no exploit code, and no Nuclei template. No threat actor attribution or active exploitation activity is known from the provided data. EPSS has not yet been assigned by FIRST.org.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

product:"Dell"
title:"Dell"
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-78015/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.