☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
Dell logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 🐛 CWE-829
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-78019

CVE-2026-78019 Vulnerability in Dell
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-10-09 00:00 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-10-10 05:00 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.33%
👁️
0.33% probability
8.2× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
🥷 MITRE: T1190
👁️
MITRE ATT&CK Tactic - Describes the strategy hackers use to execute this attack.
VULNERABLE: < 5.34.00.16
CVSS VECTOR BREAKDOWN 7.5
AV: N Attack Vector Network
AC: H Attack Complexity High
PR: L Privileges Required Low
UI: N User Interaction None
S: U Scope Unchanged
C: H Confidentiality High
I: H Integrity High
A: H Availability High
7.5
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-78019 is a high-severity vulnerability in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager affecting all versions prior to 5.34.00.16. The flaw is classified under CWE-829 (Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere), a class of weakness in which the product loads, imports, or executes functionality (code, plugins, configuration, or modules) from a source that is not under the product's trust boundary. A low-privileged attacker with remote network access can potentially exploit this issue to escalate privileges, gain filesystem access, and achieve remote code execution.

The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.5 (High), with a vector of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. The combination of low privileges required, no user interaction, and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability makes this a serious risk for any organization exposing SCG Policy Manager to a network. No public proof-of-concept, exploit code, or Nuclei template is currently available, and the vulnerability has not been added to the CISA KEV catalog. No patch confirmation is available from tracked sources, so this report treats the issue as effectively unpatched pending vendor confirmation.

⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-78019 is rooted in CWE-829, "Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere." This weakness class occurs when an application incorporates executable logic, libraries, configuration fragments, or modules from a source that falls outside its intended trust boundary. In practice, the vulnerable component accepts, resolves, or loads functionality from a location or origin that an attacker can influence, rather than from a strictly controlled and authenticated internal repository.

Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager is a management component used to define, distribute, and enforce policies across managed Dell infrastructure. As a policy management service, it necessarily ingests configuration data and operational functionality from external or semi-trusted sources — a design that makes correct trust-boundary enforcement critical. When that enforcement fails, an attacker who can influence the untrusted control sphere can cause the product to include and execute logic it should never have trusted.

The core mechanism, at the vulnerability-class level, is as follows: the product defines a location, path, or reference from which functionality is loaded or included. If the identity, integrity, or origin of that location is not validated — or if the validation can be bypassed by a low-privileged remote actor — the attacker can substitute or influence the included functionality. Because the included content is subsequently processed with the privileges of the SCG Policy Manager service, the boundary between "low-privileged remote user" and "code executing on the server" collapses.

The CVSS vector provides important context for defenders:

  • AV:N (Network) — the attack is conducted remotely over a network, so no local or adjacent positioning is required.
  • AC:H (High) — successful exploitation depends on conditions beyond the attacker's direct control, such as a specific configuration state, the presence of an attacker-influenceable trust sphere, or timing/preconditioning.
  • PR:L (Low) — the attacker requires only low-level (non-administrative) privileges, which sharply widens the pool of potential threat actors, including authenticated low-privilege users and any party able to obtain such an account.
  • UI:N (None) — no victim interaction is needed.
  • S:U (Unchanged) — the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same security authority.
  • C:H / I:H / A:H — full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The NVD description explicitly ties exploitation to three outcomes: elevation of privileges, filesystem access for the attacker, and remote execution. This indicates that a successful inclusion of untrusted functionality results in arbitrary code execution in the SCG Policy Manager context, privileged access, and the ability to reach the underlying filesystem. Notably, the EPSS score for this CVE has not yet been published by FIRST.org; no numeric probability should be assumed.

Because the vendor advisory and any technical write-up are sparse in the provided data, specific implementation details — such as the exact endpoint, parameter, or file path used to introduce the untrusted functionality — are not available. Analysts should not assume specific URIs or method names; the weakness manifests through improper trust as described above.

Exploitation Scenarios

No public PoC is available for CVE-2026-78019, and no exploit-in-the-wild evidence has been reported. The attack chain below is inferred strictly from the vulnerability class (CWE-829) and the NVD description; no specific endpoint, parameter, or file path is asserted because none is publicly documented.

1. Reconnaissance / target identification The attacker identifies an internet- or network-reachable Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager instance running a version prior to 5.34.00.16. This is accomplished through standard enumeration of exposed SCG management interfaces (e.g., via Shodan or internal asset discovery). The attacker notes the deployed version, since the flaw applies to all releases below the fixed threshold.

2. Gain low-privileged access Consistent with PR:L in the CVSS vector, the attacker obtains low-privileged credentials or access to the SCG Policy Manager — for example, through an account with minimal role, credential reuse, or a separate weakness. Elevated access is not required to reach the vulnerable trust boundary.

3. Trigger the untrusted inclusion The attacker identifies a controllable location, configuration element, or reference that SCG Policy Manager uses to include functionality (code, module, or configuration). Because the product fails to restrict this inclusion to a trusted sphere, the attacker influences or substitutes the referenced functionality with content of their choosing. This is the core CWE-829 trigger: the product loads and honors logic it should have rejected.

4. Execution and impact Once the attacker-influenced functionality is included, it is processed within the SCG Policy Manager service context. This yields, per the NVD description, (a) elevation of privileges on the host, (b) filesystem access available to the attacker, and (c) remote execution of attacker-controlled logic. The AC:H rating indicates that a precondition or configuration dependency must be satisfied for the chain to succeed, meaning not every exposed instance is trivially exploitable.

Defenders should note that because no specific technical details (endpoints, parameters, paths) are publicly documented, active exploitation cannot currently be fingerprinted by a known signature; detection must focus on anomalous inclusion/loading behavior and post-exploitation artifacts.

Impact Assessment

CVE-2026-78019 carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 (High). Interpreting the subscores:

  • Confidentiality: High (C:H) — the untrusted functionality executes with service privileges, exposing sensitive data on the host and within the SCG Policy Manager data store.
  • Integrity: High (I:H) — the attacker can alter configurations, policy definitions, and, per the description, execute code, compromising the integrity of the management platform.
  • Availability: High (A:H) — remote execution and filesystem access enable tampering that can render policy management services unavailable.
  • Privileges Required: Low (PR:L) and User Interaction: None (UI:N) — a broad set of actors (any holder of a low-privilege account) can attempt this without relying on victim behavior.
  • Attack Complexity: High (AC:H) — mitigates the base score somewhat, as exploitation is conditional rather than guaranteed, but does not remove the risk.

Blast radius: SCG Policy Manager sits in a trust-critical position in Dell infrastructure environments, where it can distribute policies to and manage numerous downstream systems. Compromise of the policy manager therefore extends risk beyond the single host: an attacker with code execution and filesystem access on the manager may be positioned to influence managed endpoints, credentials, or policy enforcement, creating a lateral-movement path into broader fleets.

Affected systems: All Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager deployments running versions prior to 5.34.00.16, particularly those reachable from untrusted networks or where low-privilege accounts exist. Because the product is a management gateway, exposure should be evaluated against both external and internal network boundaries.

Threat context: EPSS is not yet scored; no numeric exploitation-likelihood estimate is available. CVE-2026-78019 is not in CISA KEV, no PoC is public, and no exploit code has been observed. The immediate risk is driven primarily by the severity of the flaw class and the privileged position of the affected product rather than by documented active exploitation.

Detection Guidance

Sigma Rule

title: Suspicious Functionality Inclusion in Dell SCG Policy Manager
id: 4f2c9a1e-7801-4c19-8b6a-cve202678019
status: experimental
description: Detects attempts to include/load functionality from an untrusted location in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager prior to 5.34.00.16 (CVE-2026-78019, CWE-829).
references:
  - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78019
author: valtersit.com
date: 2026/01/01
logsource:
  category: process_creation
  product: windows
detection:
  selection_service:
    Image|endswith:
      - '\SecureConnectGateway.exe'
      - '\SCGPolicyManager.exe'
  selection_suspicious_child:
    ParentImage|endswith:
      - '\SecureConnectGateway.exe'
      - '\SCGPolicyManager.exe'
    Image|endswith:
      - '\cmd.exe'
      - '\powershell.exe'
      - '\wscript.exe'
      - '\cscript.exe'
      - '\mshta.exe'
  condition: selection_service or selection_suspicious_child
falsepositives:
  - Legitimate administrative scripts executed by SCG services
  - Vendor update and maintenance routines
level: high

YARA Rule

rule CVE_2026_78019_SCG_Untrusted_Inclusion
{
    meta:
        description = "Detects indicators of untrusted functionality inclusion in Dell SCG Policy Manager (CVE-2026-78019, CWE-829)"
        author = "valtersit.com"
        reference = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78019"
        date = "2026-01-01"
        severity = "high"

    strings:
        $scg1 = "Secure Connect Gateway" ascii wide nocase
        $scg2 = "SCG Policy Manager" ascii wide nocase
        $inc1 = "included" ascii wide nocase
        $inc2 = "include(" ascii wide nocase

    condition:
        uint16(0) == 0x5A4D and
        any of ($scg1, $scg2) and
        any of ($inc*)
}

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-78019 Dell SCG Policy Manager Untrusted Functionality Inclusion Attempt"; flow:established,to_server; http.uri; content:"SCG"; nocase; http.header; content:"Secure Connect Gateway"; nocase; classtype:attempted-admin; reference:cve,2026-78019; reference:url,nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78019; sid:202678019; rev:1;)

Elastic Detection

process where process.parent.name : ("SecureConnectGateway.exe", "SCGPolicyManager.exe")
  and process.name : ("cmd.exe", "powershell.exe", "wscript.exe", "cscript.exe", "mshta.exe")

Splunk SPL Query

index=windows (EventCode=1 OR EventCode=4688)
| search (ParentImage="*\\SecureConnectGateway.exe" OR ParentImage="*\\SCGPolicyManager.exe")
| search (Image="*\\cmd.exe" OR Image="*\\powershell.exe" OR Image="*\\wscript.exe" OR Image="*\\cscript.exe" OR Image="*\\mshta.exe")
| stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(Image) as child_process values(CommandLine) as cmdline by Computer, ParentImage, User
| where count > 0
| sort - count

Wazuh OSSEC Rule

<group name="windows,dell_scg,cve-2026-78019,">
  <rule id="2026781" level="12">
    <if_sid>61603</if_sid>
    <field name="win.eventdata.parentImage">SecureConnectGateway\.exe|SCGPolicyManager\.exe</field>
    <field name="win.eventdata.image">cmd\.exe|powershell\.exe|wscript\.exe|cscript\.exe|mshta\.exe</field>
    <description>Possible CVE-2026-78019 exploitation: suspicious child process spawned by Dell SCG Policy Manager component</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1190</id>
    </mitre>
    <group>cve_2026_78019,privilege_escalation,execution,</group>
  </rule>
</group>

Mitigation & Patch Guidance

Patch confidence: 0/4 (UNPATCHED — no patch evidence from any tracked source). No vendor fix, official workaround, or affected-version list is currently available from tracked sources. The 5.34.00.16 threshold referenced throughout this report is stated directly in the NVD description and should be treated as the target version, subject to vendor confirmation.

1. Immediate mitigations (until a verified patch is applied)

  • Restrict network access to Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager. The CVSS vector is AV:N; reducing reachability (firewall rules, segmentation, jump hosts, VPN-only access) directly lowers exposure.
  • Enforce least privilege: audit and minimize low-privilege accounts, since PR:L means a low-privileged user can attempt this flaw. Remove or disable unused and default accounts.
  • Monitor for anomalous functionality-inclusion and loading activity as described in the Detection Guidance section, and alert on unexpected child processes spawned by SCG components.
  • Apply strict application allow-listing/host hardening so that any unexpectedly included or executed functionality is blocked.
  • Monitor the Dell security advisory channel for an official fix and update guidance; do not treat this report as authoritative patch confirmation.

2. Patch / upgrade steps

  • Upgrade Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager to version 5.34.00.16 or later, as stated in the NVD description.
  • Before upgrading, snapshot configurations and verify the integrity of the update package against a trusted, authenticated vendor source — consistent with the trust-boundary lessons of CWE-829 itself.
  • After upgrading, validate the running version and re-test exposure. Because patch confidence is currently 0/4, confirm the fix directly with the vendor advisory before considering the issue closed.

3. Long-term hardening

  • Enforce strict trust boundaries for any code, module, plugin, or configuration that SCG Policy Manager loads or includes; require signed and authenticated sources.
  • Adopt a regular vulnerability management cadence for management-plane infrastructure, which is high-value due to its trust position.
  • Continuously monitor for CISA KEV inclusion and for public PoC or exploit development, as the risk profile can change quickly.
  • Implement defense-in-depth (network segmentation, least privilege, EDR on management hosts) so that a single boundary failure does not yield full host and fleet compromise.

References

No threat actor campaigns and no exploit-in-the-wild evidence are currently associated with CVE-2026-78019. No public proof-of-concept, exploit code, or Nuclei template has been observed.

👁️ SHODAN DORKS (THREAT HUNTING)

What is this? Security researchers use these exact search queries on Shodan.io (a search engine for internet-connected devices) to find vulnerable systems globally. You can copy these dorks to see if your organization's IP space is exposed.

product:"Dell"
title:"Dell"
◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-78019/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.